The Great Transition: When Quantum Meets Classical
Authors/Creators
Description
This comprehensive multi-scale analysis investigates the fundamental relation
ship between quantum mechanical principles and macroscopic phenomena across
21 orders of magnitude, from the Planck scale (10−35 m) to macroscopic systems
(> 10−3 m). Through systematic examination of 14 key quantum and classical phe
nomena, this study demonstrates that quantum rules are universal principles gov
erning all physical systems, with classical behavior emerging through well-defined
transition mechanisms. Statistical analysis reveals that quantum effects dominate
below 77 K, while classical behavior emerges above 300 K via thermal decoherence.
Critical temperature analysis shows superconductivity at microscales with critical
temperatures up to 100 K, and Bose-Einstein condensation at macroscopic scales
at nanokelvin temperatures. Coherence times span 21 orders of magnitude, from
femtoseconds in macroscopic systems to theoretical hours in topological qubits. The
correspondence principle explains quantum-to-classical transitions through environ
mental decoherence, with transition probabilities increasing from 5% at ultra-low
temperatures to 100% above 1000 K. These findings establish classical physics as
a limiting case of quantum mechanics, with significant implications for quantum
technologies and fundamental physics understanding.
Files
QuantumClassic2025Final.pdf
Files
(493.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:95e2ee20693e8315bcb1e52bd13ff73d
|
493.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- [1] Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the clas sical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), 715-775. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715 [2] Leggett, A. J. (2002). Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14(15), R415-R451. DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/14/15/201 14 The Great Transition Sch¨aperklaus, 2025 [3] Schlosshauer, M. (2007). Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-35775-9 [4] Arndt, M., & Hornberger, K. (2014). Testing the limits of quantum mechanical su perpositions. Nature Physics, 10(4), 271-277. DOI: 10.1038/nphys2863 [5] Bassi, A., Lochan, K., Satin, S., Singh, T. P., & Ulbricht, H. (2013). Models of wave function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests. Reviews of Modern Physics, 85(2), 471-527. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.471 [6] Penrose, R. (2014). On the gravitization of quantum mechanics 1: quantum state reduction. Foundations of Physics, 44(5), 557-575. DOI: 10.1007/s10701-013-9770-0 [7] Kaltenbaek, R., Aspelmeyer, M., Barker, P. F., Bassi, A., Bateman, J., Bongs, K., ... & Zeilinger, A. (2016). Macroscopic quantum resonators (MAQRO): 2015 update. EPJ Quantum Technology, 3(1), 5. DOI: 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-016-0043-7 [8] Vedral, V. (2011). Living in a quantum world. Scientific American, 304(6), 38-43. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0611-38 [9] Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N., & Schrieffer, J. R. (1957). Theory of superconductivity. Physical Review, 108(5), 1175-1204. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175 [10] Anderson, M. H., Ensher, J. R., Matthews, M. R., Wieman, C. E., & Cornell, E. A. (1995). Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor. Science, 269(5221), 198-201. DOI: 10.1126/science.269.5221.198 [11] Bohr, N. (1928). The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic the ory. Nature, 121(3050), 580-590. DOI: 10.1038/121580a0 [12] Heisenberg, W. (1927). ¨ Uber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretis chen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik, 43(3-4), 172-198. DOI: 10.1007/BF01397280