Published October 7, 2025 | Version v1

Aligning EU policies to address biological invasions: assessing invasion impacts across sectors

Description

Invasive alien species (IAS) affect various policy sectors, including environment, trade, and agriculture. In Europe, each of these sectors is usually regulated under different European Union legislation, but IAS is not prioritised in most sectors, and this may hinder effective tackling of biological invasions. Greater policy coherence is needed to align relevant sectors for better management of biological invasions. Engaging policymakers by sharing information on IAS impacts can help them understand the multisectoral nature of the problem and develop effective strategies.

We reviewed 602 IAS in Europe, impacting nine policy sectors and 25 domains (i.e. specific policies within a broader policy sector, each addressing particular issues and activities related to that sector portfolio). Findings were presented at the NeoBiota workshop in Lisbon on the 3rd of September 2024, attended by 54 participants, including policymakers and researchers. The workshop featured presentations and interactive sessions where participants tested the review methodology on 49 species, identifying areas for improvement, such as assessing impact scale and refining sector domains. Confusion matrices showed moderate to substantial agreement between organisers and participants in evaluating affected domains, types of impact, and confidence levels.

This study shows the crucial need for interaction and synergy between research and policy, which are essential for tackling effectively IAS in Europe.

Files

NB_article_152015.pdf

Files (1.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e6993e171fe2fcb8a72a24aa4ad72976
1.3 MB Preview Download

System files (151.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:85197c40828c631a611f2fe3384edb57
151.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Armitage CS, Sjøtun K, Jensen KH (2014) Correlative evidence for competition between Fucus serratus and the introduced chlorophyte Codium fragile subsp. fragile on the southwest coast of Norway. Botanica Marina 57(2): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2013-0087
  • Barcellos L, Pham CK, Menezes G, Bettencourt R, Rocha N, Carvalho M, Felgueiras HP (2023) A concise review on the potential applications of Rugulopteryx okamurae macroalgae. Marine Drugs 21: 1–40. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21010040
  • Bassett IJ, Crompton CW (1982) The Biology of Canadian weeds.: 55.: Ambrosia trifida L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 62: 1003–1010. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps82-148
  • Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Mrugała A, Marková Z, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Winter M, Genovesi P, Bacher S (2014) A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biology 12(5): e1001850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850
  • Boadie-Ampong M, Nishi M (2024) Exploring the benefits of invasive alien plant species for human well-being: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art and directions for prospective research. Discover Sustainability 5: e329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00552-4
  • Booy O, Cornwell L, Parrott D, Sutton-Croft M, Williams F (2017) Impact of biological invasions on infrastructure. Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services: 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_15
  • Bray JP, Hewitt CLR, Hulme PE (2024) Bridging aquatic invasive species threats across multiple sectors through one biosecurity. Bioscience 74: 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae049
  • Cannarozzi L, Paoli C, Vassallo P, Cilenti L, Bevilacqua S, Lago N, Scirocco T, Rigo I (2023) Donor-side and user-side evaluation of the Atlantic blue crab invasion on a Mediterranean lagoon. Marine Pollution Bulletin 189: e114758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114758
  • Carneiro L, Hulme PE, Cuthbert RN, Kourantidou M, Bang A, Haubrock PJ, Bradshaw CJ, Balzani P, Bacher S, Latombe G, Bodey TW (2024) Benefits do not balance costs of biological invasions. Bioscience 74: 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae010
  • Cerveira I, Baptista V, Teodósio MA, Morais P (2022) What's for dinner? Assessing the value of an edible invasive species and outreach actions to promote its consumption. Biological Invasions 24: 815–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02685-3
  • Chauvel B, Fried G, Follak S, Chapman D, Kulakova Y, Le Bourgeois T, Marisavljevic D, Monty A, Rossi J-P et al. (2021) Monographs on invasive plants in Europe N° 5: Ambrosia trifida L. Botany Letters 168: 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2021.1879674
  • Chinchio E, Crotta M, Romeo C, Drewe JA, Guitian J, Ferrari N (2020) Invasive alien species and disease risk: An open challenge in public and animal health. PLoS Pathogens 16: e1008922. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008922
  • Çinar ME, Arianoutsou M, Zenetos A, Golani D (2014) Impacts of invasive alien marine species on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A pan-European review. Aquatic Invasions 9: 391–423. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2014.9.4.01
  • Clavero M, López V, Franch N, Pou-Rovira Q, Queral JM (2015) Use of seasonally flooded rice fields by fish and crayfish in a Mediterranean wetland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 213: 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.022
  • Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychosocial Measurement 20: 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  • COM (2021) 628 final, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the review of the application of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species.
  • Conway JR, Lex A, Gehlenborg N (2017) UpSetR: An R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 33(18): 2938–2940. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364
  • D'hondt B, Vanderhoeven S, Roelandt S, Mayer F, Versteirt V, Adriaens T, Ducheyne E, San Martin G, Grégoire J-C et al. (2015) Harmonia+ and Pandora+: Risk screening tools for potentially invasive plants, animals and their pathogens. Biological Invasions 17: 1869–1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0843-1
  • Diagne C, Leroy B, Gozlan RE, Vaissière AC, Assailly C, Nuninger L, Roiz D, Jourdain F, Jarić I, Courchamp F (2020) InvaCost, a public database of the economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Scientific Data 7: e277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00586-z
  • Diagne C, Leroy B, Vaissière AC, Gozlan RE, Roiz D, Jarić I, Salles JM, Bradshaw CJ, Courchamp F (2021) High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature 592: 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6
  • EFSA (2023) The European Union One Health 2022 Zoonoses Report. EFSA Journal 21: e8442. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.p211202
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre , Magliozzi C, Lucrezi S, Oficialdegui FJ, Melone B, Gervasini E, Cardoso AC (2024) Fostering transnational collaboration in IAS management to combat invasive alien species, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/71881
  • Evans T, Kumschick S, Blackburn TM (2016) Application of the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) to a global assessment of alien bird impacts. Diversity & Distributions 22: 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12464
  • Fleming LE, Depledge MH, Maycock B, Alcantara-Creencia L, Gerwick WH, Goh HC, Gribble MO, Keast J, Raps H, Solo-Gabriele H (2023) Horizon scan of oceans and human health. In: Oceans and Human Health. Elsevier, 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95227-9.00003-8
  • Gallardo B, Bacher S, Barbosa AM, Gallien L, González-Moreno P, Martínez-Bolea V, Sorte C, Vimercati G, Vilà M (2024) Risks posed by invasive species to the provision of ecosystem services in Europe. Nature Communications 15: e2631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46818-3
  • Haubrock PJ, Turbelin AJ, Cuthbert RN, Novoa A, Taylor NG, Angulo E, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Bodey TW, Capinha C et al. (2021) Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe. NeoBiota 67: 153–190. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.58196
  • Havel JE, Kovalenko KE, Thomaz SM, Amalfitano S, Kats LB (2015) Aquatic invasive species: Challenges for the future. Hydrobiologia 750: 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2166-0
  • Hawkins CL, Bacher S, Essl F, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Genovesi P, Blackburn TM (2015) Framework and guidelines for implementing the proposed IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). Diversity & Distributions 21: 1360–1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12379
  • IPBES (2023) Summary for Policymakers of the Thematic Assessment Report on Invasive Alien Species and their Control of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In: Roy HE, Pauchard A, Stoett P, Renard Truong T, Bacher S, Galil BS, Hulme PE, Ikeda T, Sankaran KV, McGeoch, MA, Meyerson LA, Nuñez MA, Ordonez A, Rahlao SJ, Schwindt E, Seebens H, Sheppard AW, Vandvik V (Eds) IPBES secretariat. Bonn. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430692
  • Kang B-H, Shim S-I, Lee S-G, Kim K-H, Chung I-M (1998) Evaluation of Ambrosia artemisiifolia var. elatior, Ambrosia trifida, Rumex crispus for phytoremediation of Cu and Cd contaminated soil. Korean Journal of Weed Science 18: 262–267.
  • Kato-Noguchi H, Kato M (2024) Invasive Characteristics and Impacts of Ambrosia trifida. Agronomy 14: e2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122868
  • Katsanevakis S, Wallentinus I, Zenetos A, Leppäkoski E, Çinar M, Oztürk B, Grabowski M, Golani D, Cardoso A (2014) Impacts of marine invasive alien species on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A pan-European review. Aquatic Invasions 9: 391–423. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2014.9.4.01
  • Katsanevakis S, Rilov G, Edelist D (2018) Impacts of marine invasive alien species on European fisheries and aquaculture-plague or boon. CIESM Monograph 50: 125–132.
  • Kumschick S, Nentwig W (2010) Some alien birds have as severe an impact as the most effectual alien mammals in Europe. Biological Conservation 143: 2757–2762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.023
  • Lamb BT, McCrea AA, Stoodley SH, Dzialowski AR (2021) Monitoring and water quality impacts of an herbicide treatment on an aquatic invasive plant in a drinking water reservoir. Journal of Environmental Management 288: e112444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112444
  • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  • Liebman M, Nichols VA (2020) Cropping system redesign for improved weed management: A modeling approach illustrated with giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Agronomy 10: e262. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020262
  • Marchessaux G, Mangano MC, Bizzarri S, M'Rabet C, Principato E, Lago N, Veyssiere D, Garrido M, Scyphers SB, Sarà G (2023) Invasive blue crabs and small-scale fisheries in the Mediterranean sea: Local ecological knowledge, impacts and future management. Marine Policy 148: e105461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105461
  • Mollot G, Pantel J, Romanuk T (2017) The Effects of Invasive Species on the Decline in Species Richness: A Global Meta-Analysis. Advances in Ecological Research. Elsevier, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.10.002
  • Nentwig W, Kühnel E, Bacher S (2010) A generic impact-scoring system applied to alien mammals in Europe. Conservation Biology 24: 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01289.x
  • Nentwig W, Bacher S, Pyšek P, Vilà M, Kumschick S (2016) The generic impact scoring system (GISS): A standardized tool to quantify the impacts of alien species. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 188: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5321-4
  • NNSS (2015) Rapid Risk Assessment. https://www.nonnativespecies.org/assets/Uploads/RSS_RA_Corbicula_fluminea.pdf
  • Nyumba TO, Sang CC, Olago DO, Marchant R, Waruingi L, Githiora Y, Kago F, Mwangi M, Owira G et al. (2021) Assessing the ecological impacts of transportation infrastructure development: A reconnaissance study of the Standard Gauge Railway in Kenya. PLoS ONE 16: e0246248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246248
  • Paint-Small VP (2013) Linking culture, ecology and policy: The invasion of Russian-olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) on the Crow Indian reservation, south-central Montana, USA. PHD Thesis. Colorado State University.
  • Pfeiffer JM, Voeks RA (2008) Biological invasions and biocultural diversity: Linking ecological and cultural systems. Environmental Conservation 35: 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892908005146
  • Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simberloff D, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Carlton JT, Dawson W, Essl F, Foxcroft LC et al. (2020) Scientists' warning on invasive alien species. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 95: 1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12627
  • Rojas-Sandoval J, Ackerman JD, Marcano-Vega H, Willig MR (2022) Alien species affect the abundance and richness of native species in tropical forests: The role of adaptive strategies. Ecosphere 13: e4291. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4291
  • Roy HE, Rabitsch W, Scalera R, Stewart A, Gallardo B, Genovesi P, Essl F, Adriaens T, Bacher S, Booy O, Branquart E, Brunel S, Copp GH, Dean H, D'hondt B, Josefsson M, Kenis M, Kettunen M, Linnamagi M, Lucy F, Martinou A, Moore N, Nentwig W, Nieto A, Pergl J, Peyton J, Roques A, Schindler S, Schönrogge K, Solarz W, Stebbing PD, Trichkova T, Vanderhoeven S, van Valkenburg J, Zenetos A (2018) Developing a framework of minimum standards for the risk assessment of alien species. Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 526–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13025
  • Roy HE, Tricarico E, Hassall R, Johns CA, Roy KA, Scalera R, Smith KG, Purse BV (2022) The role of invasive alien species in the emergence and spread of zoonoses. Biological Invasions 25: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02978-1
  • Shackleton RT, Richardson DM, Shackleton CM, Bennett B, Crowley SL, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Estévez RA, Fischer A, Kueffer C et al. (2019a) Explaining people's perceptions of invasive alien species: A conceptual framework. Journal of Environmental Management 229: 10–26.
  • Shackleton RT, Shackleton CM, Kull CA (2019b) The role of invasive alien species in shaping loc https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045 al livelihoods and human well-being: A review. Journal of Environmental Management 229: 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.007
  • Turbelin AJ, Hudgins EJ, Catford JA, Cuthbert RN, Diagne C, Kourantidou M, Roiz D, Courchamp F (2024) Biological invasions as burdens to primary economic sectors. Global Environmental Change 87: e102858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102858
  • Vanderbush B, Longhenry C, Lucchesi DO, Barnes ME (2021) A review of zebra mussel biology, distribution, aquatic ecosystem impacts, and control with specific emphasis on South Dakota, USA. Open Journal of Ecology 11: 163–182. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2021.112014
  • Vimercati G, Probert AF, Volery L, Bernardo-Madrid R, Bertolino S, Céspedes V, Essl F, Evans T, Gallardo B, Gallien L, González-Moreno P (2022) The EICAT+ framework enables classification of positive impacts of alien taxa on native biodiversity. PLoS Biology 20: e3001729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001729
  • Watts DA, Moore GW (2011) Water-use dynamics of an invasive reed, Arundo donax, from leaf to stand. Wetlands 31: 725–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0188-1
  • Yan J, Li Y, Liang X, Zhang Y, Dawood MA, Matuli'c D, Gao J (2017) Effects of dietary protein and lipid levels on growth performance, fatty acid composition and antioxidant‐related gene expressions in juvenile loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. Aquaculture Research 48: 5385–5393. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13352