Published September 23, 2025 | Version Research Article
Journal article Open

Evolving Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Bibliomining and Scholarly Knowledge Systems

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Department of Library and Information Science The University of Burdwan

Contributors

  • 1. Department of Library and Information Science The University of Burdwan

Description

Artificial intelligence is transforming bibliomining, the systematic study of scholarly literature, by introducing advanced technological approaches. This evolution is evident across three key areas: 1) Machine learning enhances pattern recognition in authors, publications, and research topics, thereby improving recommendation systems and library services. 2) Natural language processing (NLP) facilitates semiotic analysis of library catalogues, enabling effective topic analysis and comprehension of user preferences. 3) Deep learning is employed for predictive modelling, forecasting research trends, user behaviour, and information needs. These advancements collectively improve information retrieval, metadata creation, customised searches, and data-assisted decision-making, contributing to the development of new library resources and proactive services powered by expert systems. This study provides an outlook on AI's future role in academic libraries and information provision.

Files

Malik.pdf

Files (499.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7e1b22f90fe48036ce21777cf180e258
499.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Hajkowicz, S., Sanderson, C., Karimi, S., Bratanova, A., & Naughtin, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021. Technology in Society, 74, 102260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102260 2. Haugen, I., Lener, E. F., Pannabecker, V., & Young, P. (2017). Digging deeper into text and data mining. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/79483 3. Nicholson, S., Hwang, S., Keezer, P., & O'Neill, E. T. (2003). The bibliomining process: Data warehousing and data mining for libraries. Sponsored by SIG LT. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(1), 478–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450400184 4. Jacobs, H. (n.d.). Libguides: Introduction to text analysis: analysis methods and tools. Retrieved July 21, 2025, from https://guides.library.duke.edu/c.php?g=289707&p=1930856 5. Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, S. F. A., Yogarayan, S., Amodu, O. A., & Mahmood, R. A. R. (2023). A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer. MethodsX, 11, 102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102339 6. Eden, B. L. (2023). The rise of ai: Implications and applications of artificial intelligence in academic libraries: hervieux, s. , & wheatley, a.(Eds.) .(2022) . Association of college and research libraries. 207 pp. , $80. (Pbk)00 , isbn 9780838939116. Journal of Web Librarianship, 17(1–2), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2023.2215498 7. Higgs, A. (2018). The new dimension in scholarly communications: How a global scholarly community collaboration created the world's largest linked research knowledge system. Information Services and Use, 38(1–2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-180002 8. Tong, J., & Liang, H. (2020). Research history and trend of scientific research management: Big data analysis based on bibliometrix software. 2020 International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology (ICCSMT), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSMT51754.2020.00079 9. Velez-Estevez, A., Perez, I. J., García-Sánchez, P., Moral-Munoz, J. A., & Cobo, M. J. (2023). New trends in bibliometric APIs: A comparative analysis. Information Processing & Management, 60(4), 103385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103385 10. Das, R. K., & Islam, M. S. U. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in libraries: A systematic review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2112.04573 11. Extance, A. (2018). How AI technology can tame the scientific literature. Nature, 561(7722), 273–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06617-5 12. Gabriel, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in scholarly communications: An elsevier case study. Information Services and Use, 39(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-190063 13. Link, F. E., Tosaka, Y., & Weng, C. (2015). Mining and analyzing circulation and ill data for informed collection development. College & Research Libraries, 76(6), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.6.740 14. Nicholson, S. (2003). Bibliomining for automated collection development in a digital library setting: Using data mining to discover Web‐based scholarly research works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(12), 1081–1090. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10313 15. Tomlinson, B., Torrance, A. W., Black, R., & Patterson, D. (2023). Late-binding scholarship in the age of ai: Navigating legal and normative challenges of a new form of knowledge production (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4437681). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4437681 16. Zhou, X. (2021). The construction of smart library based on data mining technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1915(2), 022069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1915/2/022069 17. Jefferson, O. A., Lang, S., Williams, K., Koellhofer, D., Ballagh, A., Warren, B., Schellberg, B., Sharma, R., & Jefferson, R. (2021). Mapping CRISPR-Cas9 public and commercial innovation using The Lens institutional toolkit. Transgenic Research, 30(4), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-021-00237-y 18. Mejia, C., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2021). Exploring topics in bibliometric research through citation networks and semantic analysis. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6, 742311. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.742311 19. Gil, Y., Greaves, M., Hendler, J., & Hirsh, H. (2014). Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence. Science, 346(6206), 171–172. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259439