Published September 22, 2025 | Version v1

PREreview of "Generative design of novel bacteriophages with genome language models"

Description

This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/17178008.

This manuscript describes very cool molecular biology with careful engineering and a convincing structural and functional assessment of a reconstructed ΦX174-like phage. The build-test workflow is clearly described, and the recovery of infectious particles provides a strong experimental anchor for the computational design story. This is a great demonstration of what is currently feasible for whole-genome phage engineering.

However, it misses a major opportunity to contextualize the generative model performance with explicit baselines. This makes it difficult to assess whether there is a true advance due to the ability of the generative model to move in sequence space with success rates (~16/300) above alternative (lightweight) models. Moreover, the sequence space explored here appears to stay close to known natural sequences, so it is hard to appreciate how the generative model adds novelty beyond proximity to existing genomes. Side-by-side comparisons against simple alternatives (for example a consensus design, frame-preserving randomization under GC and codon constraints, ancestral reconstruction, or family statistical models such as direct coupling analysis) would clarify whether the model improves assembly success or shifts resistance outcomes. Recent studies provide useful templates for such "null model" panels, see OpenCRISPR Figure 3E (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12422970/), and ProGen Lysozymes Figure S10 (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10400306/) for evaluating LLM-generation of proteins. Including analogous baselines here, with success rates and resistance readouts reported for each, would make the impact of this contribution and generality of this approach unmistakable.

Competing interests

J.S.F. receives consulting fees from and has an equity interest in Profluent Bio, a company using generative AI. J.B.-D. is a scientific advisory board member of SNIPR Biome, Excision Biotherapeutics, LeapFrog Bio, and Acrigen Biosciences and is a co-founder of Acrigen Biosciences and ePhective Therapeutics.

Files

Files (2.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9d8c5d1a84935120302ac12c4f2f0032
2.2 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is identical to
Peer review: https://prereview.org/reviews/17178008 (URL)
Reviews
Preprint: 10.1101/2025.09.12.675911 (DOI)

Subjects

Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
https://openalex.org/T11048
Ecology
https://openalex.org/subfields/2303
Environmental Science
https://openalex.org/fields/23
Physical Sciences
https://openalex.org/domains/3
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
https://openalex.org/T13937
Molecular Biology
https://openalex.org/subfields/1312
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
https://openalex.org/fields/13
Life Sciences
https://openalex.org/domains/1
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
https://openalex.org/T10015