Published September 10, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Biopower, Discipline, and Resistance in The Hunger Games (2012): A Foucauldian Analysis

Description

This study examines The Hunger Games (2012), directed by Gary Ross, through Michel Foucault’s concepts of power, discipline, and biopolitics. Using qualitative content analysis, the research investigates how the Capitol maintains dominance over the districts and how resistance emerges within oppressive systems. The findings reveal: 1) the Capitol’s exercise of biopower reduces life to political control, exemplified in the ritual of the Reaping where sacrifice is normalized as governance. 2) disciplinary power is reinforced through spectacle and propaganda, such as televised ceremonies and the constant reminder of rebellion, which embed fear and institutionalize trauma across generations. 3) despite these mechanisms of control, acts of resistance emerge: Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark subvert Capitol authority through personal defiance, illustrating Foucault’s view that power inevitably produces resistance. By highlighting these dynamics, the film underscores how power operates not only through coercion but also through cultural production, surveillance, and ideology. This analysis contributes to the understanding of how popular culture reflects and critiques structures of domination and the possibilities of resistance in both fictional and real-world contexts.

Notes

Non-commercial / non-profit, but for Education purpose only, served by: "Seventh-Day Adventist Church Education Foundation Makarios", Indonesia

Files

90-101 Biopower, Discipline, and Resistance in The Hunger Games (2012)_ A Foucauldian Analysis.pdf

Additional details

Identifiers

ISSN
3025-3020
ISSN
3025-3934

Related works

Is published in
Journal article: 3025-3020 (ISSN)
Journal article: 3025-3934 (ISSN)

Dates

Issued
2025-08-31

References

  • Aravindan, A., & Nair, A. R. (2021). The omnipresent and the omnipotent – Surveillance and power: A critical analysis of Suzanne Collins' The Hunger Games. SMART MOVES Journal IJELLH, 9(8), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v9i8.11152
  • Debord, G. (1967). The society of the spectacle. Black & Red.
  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1975)
  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction. Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, M. (2003). The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (P. Rabinow & N. Rose, Eds.). New Press.
  • Koopman, C. (2018). Infopolitics, biopolitics, anatomo-politics: Toward a genealogy of the power of data. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 39(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj20183913
  • Trilling, L. (1950). The liberal imagination: Essays on literature and society. Viking Press.
  • UNESCO. (2021). 2025 gender report: Global education monitoring report. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en
  • World Inequality Lab. (2021). World inequality report 2022. https://wir2022.wid.world