Published September 1, 2025 | Version v1
Book Open

Learning in the Metaverse: Building Educational Worlds Without Limits

  • 1. Dhaka Residential Model College

Description

The persistent chime of an alarm clock no longer marks the start of Lena’s school day. Instead, a soft, ambient glow from the sleek headset on her desk begins to pulse, a gentle summons from the digital ether. From her small apartment in a bustling city, she dons the device, not as an escape from reality, but as a passport to a classroom without walls. The familiar confines of her room dissolve, pixel by pixel, reforming into the breathtaking, sun-drenched atrium of a vast, crystalline library that seems to float among the clouds. To her left, the animated avatar of her best friend, Maya, waves enthusiastically; Maya’s physical body is logging in from a rural town hundreds of miles away. To her right, a holographic model of the solar system spins slowly, its planets orbiting in precise, graceful silence. Their teacher, Dr. Evans, appears not at a chalkboard but as a detailed digital presence, his avatar gesturing towards a shimmering portal that now materializes in the centre of the space. “Today, historians,” his voice says, clear and present as if he were standing beside her, “we’re not going to read about the Roman Forum. We’re going to walk its streets.”

With a collective sense of anticipation that is almost palpable, Lena and her twenty-seven classmates, a cohort spanning three different time zones, step through the portal. The cool, polished glass of the library floor transforms into the worn, warm travertine of the Via Sacra. The air grows thick with the imagined smells of dust and incense. Around them, the colossal marble columns of the Basilica Julia rise towards a Mediterranean sky, and the echoes of a forgotten civilization are made audibly, tangibly real. Lena reaches out a hand, and her avatar’s fingers brush against ancient stone, triggering a contextual menu that details the building’s history and architectural style. This is not a video game; this is her first-period History class.

For Lena and her generation, learning is no longer confined to a classroom’s four walls or the flat, two-dimensional surface of a screen. It is an experience. It is a place you can go.

Files

Learning in the Metaverse - Building Educational Worlds Without Limits.pdf

Additional details

Identifiers

ARK
ark:/13960/s2cvgwpz0d9

Dates

Issued
2025-10-01

References

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
  • Bailenson, J. (2018). Experience on Demand: What Virtual Reality Is, How It Works, and What It Can Do. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Baker, R. S. (2016). Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 600-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0105-0
  • Ball, M. (2022). The Metaverse: And How It Will Revolutionize Everything. Liveright Publishing. https://www.matthewball.vc/all/themetaverse
  • Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT Initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual review of psychology, 59, 617-645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
  • Bashkatov, S. A., et al. (2023). The effectiveness of virtual reality training in improving surgical skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Surgical Education, 80(5), 1234-1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.03.011
  • Chen, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Moderating the metaverse: Strategies for addressing harassment in immersive social VR platforms. Journal of Online Trust and Safety, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5456/jots.2023.001
  • Chrastil, E. R., & Warren, W. H. (2012). Active and passive contributions to spatial learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 19(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0182-x
  • Dede, C. (2009). Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311
  • Dezuanni, M. (2021). The Roblox Generation: Children as Game Designers and Entrepreneurs. In Proceedings of the 2021 DiGRA International Conference: Play Everywhere. Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA). http://www.digra.org/digital-library/publications/the-roblox-generation-children-as-game-designers-and-entrepreneurs/
  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  • Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
  • Fox, J., & Ahn, S. J. (2013). Avatars. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships (pp. 292-316). Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Freeman, G., & Maloney, D. (2021). Problematic interactions in VR social platforms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479516
  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan. (His work on situated learning in games is directly applicable to metaverse design).
  • Haynes, C., & Holmevik, J. R. (Eds.). (1998). High Wired: On the Design, Use, and Theory of Educational MOOs. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7895
  • Irrgang, C. (2023). From ethics washing to ethics bashing: A view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594089
  • Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8435.001.0001
  • Kluge, S., & Riley, L. (2008). Teaching in Virtual Worlds: Opportunities and Challenges. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 5, 127-135. https://doi.org/10.28945/1000
  • Lawson, B. D. (2014). Motion sickness symptomatology and origins. In K. S. Hale & K. M. Stanney (Eds.), Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 531-599). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17360-27
  • Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037123
  • Marcus, A. S., & Stoddard, J. D. (2009). The inconvenient truth about teaching history with documentary film. The Social Studies, 100(6), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990903283957
  • Nebel, S., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2016). Mining Learning and Crafting Scientific Experiments: A Literature Review on the Use of Minecraft in Education and Research. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 355–366. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.2.355
  • Owens, A. (2018). Project-based learning in the urban sustainability classroom. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(2), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1373618
  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
  • Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
  • Schmidt, M. M., & Ralph, D. L. (2021). *Virtual reality and school success: A cost-benefit analysis for K-12 education*. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211032098
  • Thiel, S. K. (2018). Augmented Reality and the Re-Configuring of Historical Consciousness. In 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) held jointly with 2018 24th International Conference on Virtual Systems & Multimedia (VSMM 2018) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2018.8810092
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan update. Office of Educational Technology. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
  • VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
  • Webb, M., Gibson, D., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2013). Challenges for information technology supporting educational assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12033
  • XR Safety Initiative. (2022). XR ethics and safety framework. https://xrsi.org/publication/xresfYeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., … Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
  • Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus Effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x
  • Zhao, Y. (2018). Reach for greatness: Personalizable education for all children. Corwin Press.
  • Zucker, A. A., & Light, D. (2009). Laptop programs for students. Science, 323(5910), 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167705
  • Shortern CItation