AI-Driven risk prediction models for hypertensive emergencies in diabetic patients: validation in multi-ethnic cohorts
Authors/Creators
- 1. PhD, сandidate of Medical Sciences, Department of Folk Medicine, Occupational Diseases, and Allergology, Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sino, Bukhara, Uzbekistan
- 2. PHD, docent, A head of the Department of pathological anatomy of the Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sino, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.
- 3. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), docent, Department of Faculty and Hospital Therapy, Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sino, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.
- 4. DSc, assistant professor, Head of the Department of Pathological Physiology, Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sino, Bukhara, Uzbekistan
- 5. Assistant of the Department of Pediatrics at the Fergana Medical Institute of Public Health, Uzbekistan
- 6. Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan
- 7. associate professor of the Department of Biology, Urgench State University, Uzbekistan:
- 8. Associate professor of the Tashkent State Technical University named after Islam Karimov, Uzbekistan
Description
The study was undertaken to confirm artificial intelligence (AI) risk models of hypertensive emergencies among diabetic patients in multiethnic populations. The study was a multicenter historical cohort involving 24,718 diabetic and hypertensive patients from various ethnic groups (European, African, South Asian, Hispanic, East Asian, and Middle Eastern). The performances of three machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, neural network, and random forest) were contrasted with logistic regression. The outcomes showed that the XGBoost model, which recorded AUC values of 0.89 for Cohort B and 0.85 for Cohort B, was significantly better compared to standard models and had a high ability to identify evolving patterns such as systolic blood pressure fluctuation and kidney function changes. However, subgroup analyses revealed significant ethnic differences in model performance: sensitivity was lower in African-American (76.2%) compared to South Asian (88.1%) patients, and positive predictive value was 15% lower in Hispanics compared with East Asians. Additionally, poor calibration in high-risk groups (African-Americans) and the influence of social determinants of health on predictive accuracy were observed. These findings reaffirm the importance of validating models in every ethnic environment, including social variables, and developing dynamic calibration procedures to provide equitable and accurate treatment.
Files
2 AI-Driven risk prediction models for.pdf
Files
(279.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:9f2b2c126bddfff0af0e77eea41bd418
|
279.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Aboelmaaty M, Ak H, Gaddam N, Aqueel M, Ahmed M, Mirza MSS, Ahmed K. Complications of Diabetes: Cardiovascular, Renal, and Neurological Implications. J Adv Med Med Res. 2025;37:65855. doi:10.9734/jammr/2025/v37i65855
- 2. Muddu M, Mutebi E, Ssinabulya I, Kizito S, Mondo C. Hypertension among newly diagnosed diabetic patients at Mulago National Referral Hospital in Uganda: a cross sectional study. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2018;29(4). doi:10.5830/CVJA-2018-015.
- 3. Yun J. Relationship between autonomic and peripheral neuropathies and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes. Cardiovasc Prev Pharmacother. 2024;6:e17. doi:10.36011/cpp.2024.6.e17.
- 4. Manan HA, Chishti H, Hewlett FD. Prevalence and Predictors of Silent Myocardial Ischemia in Diabetic Patients. Cureus. 2025; [e82407]. doi:10.7759/cureus.82407.
- 5. Keerthana S, Anitha G. A Study On Cardiovascular Disease Detection In Diabetic Patients. In: 2025 Eleventh International Conference on Bio Signals, Images, and Instrumentation (ICBSII); 2025. doi:10.1109/ICBSII65145.2025.11013590.
- 6. Selvaraj S. Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Patient Risk Predictions: Empowering Doctors with Data-Driven Insights. Int J Sci Res. 2024;13(7):371-376. doi:10.21275/sr24707023233.
- 7. Benenson I, Waldron F, Jadotte Y, Dreker M, Holly C. Risk factors for hypertensive crisis in adult patients: a systematic review. JBI Evid Synth. 2021;19(6):1447-1468. doi:10.11124/JBIES-20-00243.
- 8. Sacca L, Lobaina D, Burgoa S, Lotharius K, Moothedan E, Gilmore N, et al. Promoting Artificial Intelligence for Global Breast Cancer Risk Prediction and Screening in Adult Women: A Scoping Review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(9):2525. doi:10.3390/jcm13092525.
- 9. Cai Y, Cai Y, Tang L-Y, Wang Y-H, Gong M, Jing T-C, et al. Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2024;22(1). doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03273-7.
- 10. Wang SCY, Nickel G, Venkatesh KP, Raza MM, Kvedar J. AI-based diabetes care: risk prediction models and implementation concerns. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:36. doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01034-7.
- 11. Tu Q, Hyun K, Lin S, Hafiz N, Manandi D, Li E, et al. Impacts of hypertension and diabetes on the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: findings from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study cohort. J Hypertens. 2024;42(8):1590-1599. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003946.
- 12. Benenson I, Waldron F, Jones Dillon SA, Zinzuwadia S, Mbadugha N, Vicente N, et al. Hypertensive emergencies in diabetic patients from predominantly African American urban communities. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018;40(8):734-740. doi:10.1080/10641963.2018.1516774.
- 13. Prakash G, Dhewle P, Bose SC, Kandibendla V. Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Hypertensive Emergency. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e63783. doi:10.7759/cureus.63783
- 14. Pascarella G, Rossi M, Montella E, Capasso A, De Feo G, Botti G, et al. Risk analysis in healthcare organizations: methodological framework and critical variables. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:3537-3552. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S309098.
- 15. Rahman A, Debnath T, Kundu D, Khan MSI, Aishi AA, Sazzad S, et al. Machine learning and deep learning-based approach in smart healthcare: Recent advances, applications, challenges and opportunities. AIMS Public Health. 2024;11(1). doi:10.3934/publichealth.2024004.
- 16. Almansouri N, Awe M, Rajavelu S, Jahnavi K, Shastry R, Hasan A, Hasan H, Lakkimsetti M, AlAbbasi RK, Gutiérrez BC, Haider A. Early Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: An In-Depth Review. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e55869. doi:10.7759/cureus.55869.
- 17. Lola, I., Sakina, T., Maktuba, M., Bekhruzbek, K., Shaxodat, Y., & Rasuljon, S. (2025). The role of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in post-stroke motor recovery: synergies with antihypertensive therapy. Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertension, 20(4).
- 18. Sadoqat, S., Surayyo, U., Shoxsanam, B., Nigina, R., Shahnoza, A., Dadaxon, A., & Matmuratov, A. (2025). Integrating hypertension control into post-stroke neurorehabilitation: a randomized trial on cognitive and motor recovery outcomes. Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertension, 20(4).
- 19. Julaiti T, Pan J. 149-OR: Integrative AI-Based Risk Score for Cardiometabolic Diseases—Comparing Cardiovascular Risk Prediction to the Framingham Score. Diabetes. 2025;74(Supplement 1):149-OR. doi:10.2337/db25-149-or.
- 20. Gu T, Pan W, Yu J, Ji G, Meng X, Wang Y, Li M. Mitigating bias in AI mortality predictions for minority populations: a transfer learning approach. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025;25. doi:10.1186/s12911-025-02862-7.
- 21. Ogungbe O, Turkson-Ocran RN, Nkimbeng M, Cudjoe J, Miller HN, Baptiste D, et al. Social determinants of hypertension and diabetes among African immigrants: the African immigrants health study. Ethn Health. 2021;27(6):1345-1357. doi:10.1080/13557858.2021.1879026.
- 22. Khor S, Haupt E, Hahn E, Lyons LJ, Shankaran V, Bansal A. Racial and ethnic bias in risk prediction models for colorectal cancer recurrence when race and ethnicity are omitted as predictors. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2318495. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18495.
- 23. Khor S, Haupt E, Hahn E, Lyons LJ, Shankaran V, Bansal A. Racial and ethnic bias in risk prediction models for colorectal cancer recurrence when race and ethnicity are omitted as predictors. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2318495. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18495.
- 24. Wójcik Z, Dimitrova V, Warrington L, Velikova G, Absolom K. Using artificial intelligence to predict patient outcomes from patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025;23. doi:10.1186/s12955-025-02365-z.
- 25. Huang Y, Guo J, Chen W-H, Lin H-Y, Tang H, Wang F, Xu H, Bian J. A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data. J Biomed Inform. 2024 Mar 6;151:104622. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104622.