Published August 19, 2025 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Megachile (Megachiloides) manifesta Cresson 1878

  • 1. Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717

Description

Megachile (Megachiloides) manifesta Cresson, 1878

Megachile manifesta Cresson, 1878: 122. Drons 2012: 58.

Megachile (Xeromegachile) manifesta; Mitchell 1937a: 352. Butler 1965: 8. Hurd 1979: 2064.

Megachile (Megachiloides) manifesta; Raw 2002: 18. Scott et al. 2011: 55. Sheffield et al. 2011: 55.

Diagnosis. The female of M. manifesta can be identified by its 4-toothed mandibles with an asymmetrical emargination between the 3 rd and 4 th teeth that is deepest nearer the 4 th tooth (Fig. 7C), black scopal setae on S6 and at least the apical part of S5, the basal portion with white scopal setae, and T5 surface matte to shiny with punctures ≤ 1 diameter apart medially. Females are closest to M. nevadensis, which has all white scopal setae on S5, and M. wheeleri, which has the surface of T5polished and shiny with punctures 2–4 diameters apart medially (see Taxonomic Challenges). The male of M. manifesta can be identified by its wide and spatulate procoxal spine without a setae patch at the base (Fig. 8I), triangular metatarsomeres (viewed laterally) (Fig. 8F), and a smooth, rounded carina on the ventral mesepisternum (viewed ventrally, directly posterior to the procoxal spine). The male of M. manifesta is most similar to M. wheeleri, which differs in having quadrate metatarsomeres (viewed laterally) (Fig. 8G).

Notes. This species, in general occurring in the western U.S. and Canada, is found in drier areas of eastern and south-central Montana (Fig. 1S). Photographs, a full morphological description, and notes on the biology of this species can be found in Sheffield et al. (2011).

Notes

Published as part of Pritchard, Zoe A., Ivie, Michael A., O'Neill, Kevin M. & Delphia, Casey M., 2025, A faunal treatment of the Megachile (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) of Montana with a key for their identification, pp. 1-51 in Zootaxa 5683 (1) on page 35, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5683.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/16984989

Files

Files (2.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5d6827790f538f9a7c4810439292b93b
2.2 kB Download

System files (19.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:23d72a3e80ee674f3bd3f5bee0294ed1
19.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

References

  • Cresson, E. T. (1878) Descriptions of new North American Hymenoptera in the collection of the American Entomological Society. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 7, 61-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/25076368
  • Drons, D. J. (2012) An Inventory of Native Bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in the Black Hills of South Dakota and Wyoming. M. S. Thesis, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, 88 pp.
  • Mitchell, T. B. (1937 a) A revision of the genus Megachile in the Nearctic region. Part V. Taxonomy of the subgenus Xeromegachile (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 62, 323-382. [1936]
  • Butler, G. D. (1965) The distribution and host plants of leaf-cutter bees in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 167. Agricultural Experiment Station, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 19 pp.
  • Hurd, P. D. (1979) Apoidea. In: K. V. Krombein, Hurd, P. D., Smith, D. R. & Burks, B. D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. Vol. 2. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C., pp. 1741-2209.
  • Raw, A. (2002) New combinations and synonymies of leafcutter and mason bees of the Americas (Megachile, Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Zootaxa, 71 (1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.71.1.1
  • Scott, V., Ascher, J., Griswold, T. & Nufio, C. (2011) The Bees of Colorado. Natural History Inventory of Colorado, 23, 1-100.
  • Sheffield, C. S., Ratti, C., Packer, L. & Griswold, T. (2011) Leafcutter and mason bees of the genus Megachile Latreille (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in Canada and Alaska. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification, 18, 1-107. https://doi.org/10.3752/cjai.2011.18