Transformative Learning in the MATATAG English 7 Curriculum: A Content Analysis with Teacher Perspectives
Contributors
Researcher:
Description
The Department of Education’s (DepEd) MATATAG Curriculum, launched in 2024, represents a major reform in Philippine basic education, aiming to address curriculum congestion and misalignment while fostering 21st-century competencies. This study evaluates the Grade 7 English curriculum through the lens of Transformative Learning Theory (TLT) to determine its potential for cultivating critical reflection, dialogue, and action-oriented learning. Employing a qualitative content analysis, the study examined content standards, performance standards, and learning competencies outlined in the MATATAG Curriculum Guide for English, complemented by a review of eight published studies on teachers’ perspectives. Results indicated strong alignment between the curriculum and TLT’s four phases: disorienting dilemmas, critical reflection, rational discourse, and transformative action. English 7 competencies were found to encourage learners to interrogate multiple perspectives, analyze sociocultural contexts, and produce multimodal outputs that reflect cultural identity and social engagement. Teacher perspectives, however, revealed both enablers and constraints in implementation. Supports included streamlined competencies, authentic communicative tasks, and collegial collaboration, while barriers comprised limited training, resource shortages, heavy workloads, and large class sizes. The findings highlight that while the MATATAG curriculum embodies transformative ambitions, their realization depends heavily on systemic support and teacher preparedness. The study concludes that professional development, resource provision, and participatory curriculum implementation are essential for translating policy intentions into classroom-based transformative learning.
Files
Transformative Learning in the MATATAG English 7 Curriculum.pdf
Files
(328.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:43aa69db0336c69dbc2067f7499e8884
|
328.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Alvarado, C. C. P. (2023). Communicative Competence in Spiral Progression Curriculum: A Study Reinforcing the Implementation of MATATAG Curriculum in the Philippines. Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 5(6), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.5.6.3
- Bejasa, R. C. (2025). Lived Experiences of the Public-School Teachers in the Implementation of Matatag Curriculum. London Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 25(1), 57–68. https://journalspress.uk/index.php/LJRHSS/article/view/1272
- Brock, S. E. (2010). Measuring the importance of precursor steps to transformative learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(2), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609333084
- Caol-Olan, B. R. D., Baloloy, A. S. F., Caling, N. B., Ebuen, R. P. A., Labastida, J. J. D., Nicolas, K. F. L., Sampan, A. C. P., & Clavero, Jr. A. B. (2024). THE PERSPECTIVES OF TEACHERS FROM A PRIVATE UNIVERSITY IN METRO MANILA REGARDING THE CHANGES BROUGHT BY MATATAG CURRICULUM. Cosmos: An International Journal of Art & Higher Education, 14(1), 38-46. https://cosmosjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CAHE-JJ25-141-9-Caol-Olan-Bench-Russel-D.pdf
- Dadul, M. A. C., Labutap, R. G., Pag-Arigon, N. B., Dacuno, K. J. D., & Biasong, M. D. R. (2025). Teachers' Sentiments on the Implementation of Deped Matatag Curriculum. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(6), 2551-2568. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v4i6.192
- Demate, D. R. B., Aclis, M. S., Catbagan, F. C. P., Molina, G. G., Ramos, N. U., & Patacsil, F. (2025). Teacher perspectives on MATATAG curriculum: Challenges and collaborative solutions. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(11), 2025351. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025351
- Department of Education. (2024a). DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2024_010.pdf
- Department of Education. (2024b). MATATAG Curriculum: English Grades 4 & 7. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/MATATAG-ENGLISH-CG-G4-and-7.pdf
- Kosonen, K., & Young, C. (2009). Mother tongue as a bridge language of instruction: Policies and experiences in Southeast Asia. SEAMEO. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/527021468104056444/pdf/563290PUB0Box31guage0of0Instruction.pdf
- Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
- Motel, G. M. (2025). Teachers' Narratives on Preparedness and Content Delivery in the Implementation of the Matatag Curriculum. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 3(2), 73–107. https://doi.org/10.60132/jip.v3i2.487
- National Education for All Committee. (2006). Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda (2005-2010). DepEd. https://depedkoronadalcity.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/basic-educational-sector-reform-agenda-brochure.pdf
- Origenes, R. J. (2025). From the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELC) to MATATAG Curriculum: A Call for Collaborative Piloting for Curriculum Innovation, Selection of English Competencies, and Module Design. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5159421
- Po, E. C. (2025). Challenges Faced by School Heads and Teachers in the Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum and Performance of Students. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDIES, V(3), 88-98. https://www.ijams-bbp.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ENARCISA-C.-PO.pdf
- Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications. https://www.daneshnamehicsa.ir/userfiles/files/1/9-%20Qualitative%20Content%20Analysis%20in%20Practice%20(2013,%20SAGE%20Publications).pdf
- Taylor, E. W., & Cranton, P. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-593949-d173cb0174.pdf