Published June 27, 2025 | Version 2

Digital credentials for environmental competencies: A scoping review of open recognition systems in climate education

  • 1. GIR-TADRUS, ETSIIAA, Universidad de Valladolid, Palencia, Castile and León, 34004, Spain
  • 2. InTerACT, UniLaSalle, Beauvais, Hauts-de-France, 60000, France
  • 3. Consorzio Scuola Comunità Impresa, Novara, NO, 28100, Italy
  • 4. NOVA School of Business and Economics, NOVA University, Lisbon, 2775-405, Portugal

Description

Open education recognition systems are transforming how skills and competencies are validated across formal, informal, and non-formal learning environments. This scoping review examines current practices in open recognition systems—including micro-credentials, digital badges, and open educational resources (OER) completion certificates and participation badges—with particular emphasis on their application and potential in climate education. Following systematic search strategies across eight databases, we analyzed 70 publications (2010-2024) comprising journal articles, book chapters, institutional reports, and conference proceedings to map existing evidence, identify key concepts, and uncover gaps in applying these systems to climate education. The analysis reveals that while these systems have significant potential to bridge academic learning with professional demands and environmental action, their impact is limited by persistent challenges: lack of definitional consistency and quality-assurance standards across institutions; significant technological barriers to credential portability and verification; and lack of awareness and trust from employers, undermining these credentials' currency in the labor market. Despite these challenges, notable findings include the growing importance of micro-credentials for validating climate adaptation skills, the value of open badges in recognizing interdisciplinary competencies essential for environmental action, and the need for integrated qualification frameworks that can accommodate both formal and informal learning pathways in sustainability education. This integration is critical for validating the interdisciplinary and action-oriented skills demanded by the green economy, often acquired through the non-formal and informal learning pathways characteristic of environmental action and advocacy. Our review concludes that a significant implementation and research gap exists between open recognition's potential and its application in climate education. Most notably, we find a near-complete absence of recognition frameworks for eco-pedagogical activities, perpetuating focus on technical knowledge over transformative, action-oriented learning. We recommend that future work prioritize creating robust, co-designed assessment models for these critical competencies to bridge the gap between education and meaningful climate action.

This review examines how digital badges and micro-credentials can be used to recognize learning and actions related to climate change. These digital recognition tools provide ways to acknowledge skills and knowledge gained outside traditional education. We analyzed research published between 2010 and 2024 to understand current practices, challenges, and recommendations.

The review found that digital badges and micro-credentials can effectively validate climate-related competencies across various learning environments. They are particularly useful for recognizing interdisciplinary skills and action-oriented achievements essential for addressing climate challenges. However, there are significant obstacles to their widespread adoption, including lack of standardization, limited awareness among employers, and technical implementation barriers.

Based on the literature, we recommend integrating these recognition systems into institutional programs, aligning them with employer needs, developing clear design standards, and creating frameworks specifically for climate education. The findings suggest that with proper implementation, digital recognition systems could bridge formal education with practical environmental actions, offering flexible pathways for developing climate literacy and action competencies.

This research is part of the OpenPass4Climate Erasmus+ project, which aims to develop an open recognition system for climate-related achievements across European higher education institutions.

Files

openreseurope-5-22473.pdf

Files (1.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bee599f8252f6ce970066a44925af81d
1.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Abramovich S, Schunn C, Higashi RM (2013). Are badges useful in education?: it depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educ Technol Res Dev. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2
  • Adedoyin OB, Altinay F (2023). Open educational resources: evaluation of students' intention to use and motivation to create. Br J Educ Technol. doi:10.1111/bjet.13313
  • Ahsan K, Akbar S, Kam B (2023). Implementation of micro-credentials in higher education: a systematic literature review. Educ Inf Technol. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11739-z
  • Andreotti V (2006). Soft versus critical global citizenship education. Policy Pract Dev Educ Rev.
  • Annelin A, Boström GO (2022). An assessment of key sustainability competencies: a review of scales and propositions for validation. Int J Sustain High Educ. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-05-2022-0166
  • Arksey H, O'Malley L (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Askeroth JH, Newby TJ (2020). Digital badge use in specific learner groups. Int J Innov Teach Learn High Educ. doi:10.4018/IJITLHE.2020010101
  • Bossu C, Fountain W (2015). Capacity-building in open education: an Australian approach. Open Praxis. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.7.2.197
  • Bozkurt A, Koseoglu S, Singh L (2019). An analysis of peer reviewed publications on openness in education in half a century: trends and patterns in the open hemisphere. Australas J Educ Technol. doi:10.14742/ajet.4252
  • Carey KL, Stefaniak JE (2018). An exploration of the utility of digital badging in higher education settings. Educ Technol Res Dev. doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9602-1
  • Charleer S, Klerkx J, Santos JL (2013). Improving awareness and reflection through collaborative, interactive visualizations of badges.
  • Chauhan A (2014). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS): emerging trends in assessment and accreditation. Dig Educ Rev.
  • Cheng Z, Watson SL, Newby TJ (2018). Goal setting and open digital badges in higher education. Techtrends. doi:10.1007/s11528-018-0249-x
  • Cieply S, Grand I (2019). Quels usages pour les dans l'enseignement supérieur? Analyse de la diffusion d'une innovation à l'IAE Caen. Management & Avenir. doi:10.3917/mav.113.0015
  • Corrall S, Pinfield S (2014). Coherence of "open" initiatives in higher education and research: framing a policy agenda. (iConference 2014 - Breaking Down Walls – Culture • Context • Computing; held at Berlin School of Library and Information Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mar. 4–7). doi:10.9776/14085
  • Cox R (2021). Climate adaptation micro-credential strategy.
  • Cox R, Niederer S, Forsmann V (2020). Climate adaptation competency framework.
  • Cumberland DM, Deckard TG, Kahle-Piasecki L (2023). Making sense of the digital badging landscape in education and workplace settings: a scoping review of the empirical literature. Eur J Train Dev. doi:10.1108/EJTD-06-2022-0067
  • Currie S, Eby L, Feller A (2023). Moving with the times: the use of digital badges as a learning option. Dev Learn Organ Int J. doi:10.1108/DLO-02-2023-0057
  • Davis K, Singh S (2015). Digital badges in afterschool learning: documenting the perspectives and experiences of students and educators. Comput Educ. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.011
  • Devedžić V, Jovanović J (2015). Developing open badges: a comprehensive approach. Educ Technol Res Dev. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9388-3
  • Dyjur P, Lindstrom G (2017). Perceptions and uses of digital badges for professional learning development in higher education. Techtrends. doi:10.1007/s11528-017-0168-2
  • Farmer T, West RE (2016). Opportunities and challenges with digital open badges. Educ Technol.
  • Farrow R, Ferguson R, Weller M (2021). Assessment and recognition of MOOCs: the state of the art. J Innov Polytech Educ. doi:10.69520/jipe.v3i1.94
  • Fitsilis P (2024). Navigating the skills revolution: the essential role of competence frameworks. Qeios. doi:10.32388/V28REV
  • Freire P (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed.
  • Friesen N, Wihak C (2013). From OER to PLAR: credentialing for open education. Open Praxis. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.22
  • Gadotti M (2008). Education for sustainability: a contribution to the decade of education for sustainable development. Int Rev Educ. doi:10.5585/eccos.n54.16138
  • Gates T, Walters A (2015). Are MOOCs the next trend in social work?: implications for practice education. Adv Soc Work. doi:10.18060/17112
  • Gibson D, Kovanovic V, Ifenthaler D (2023). Learning theories for Artificial Intelligence promoting learning processes. Br J Educ Technol. doi:10.1111/bjet.13341
  • Gibson D, Ostashewski N, Flintoff K (2015). Digital badges in education. Educ Inf Technol. doi:10.1007/s10639-013-9291-7
  • Goodyear M, Nathan-Roberts D (2017). Gamification and the design of badges in relation to educational achievement. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. doi:10.1177/1541931213601789
  • Halttunen T, Brauer S, Jutila S (2024). Role of micro-credentials and open badges in sustainable tourism education. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73187-7_14
  • Harris J, Wihak C (2018). The Recognition of Non-Formal Education in higher education: where are we now, and are we learning from experience?. Int J E-Learn Distance Educ.
  • Hung R (2021). Ecopedagogy and education. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1502
  • Jean-Marie E, Millet F (2022). Open badge: développer l'accessibilité des outils, développer les usages.
  • Jirgensons M, Kapenieks J (2018). Blockchain and the future of digital learning credential assessment and management. J Teach Educ Sustain. doi:10.2478/jtes-2018-0009
  • Jung I, Lee J (2020). A cross-cultural approach to the adoption of Open Educational Resources in higher education. Br J Educ Technol. doi:10.1111/bjet.12820
  • Kahle-Piasecki L, Bereza M, Cumberland DM (2024). Digital badges: a pilot study of employer perceptions. Small Bus Inst J. doi:10.53703/001c.125642
  • Kahn R (2010). Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, and planetary crisis: the ecopedagogy movement.
  • Knox J (2013). The limitations of access alone: moving towards open processes in education technology. Open Praxis. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.36
  • Kopnina H (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. J Environ Educ. doi:10.1080/00958964.2019.1710444
  • Kopp M, Ebner M (2017). Certification of MOOCs: advantages, challenges and practical experiences. Rev Esp Pedagog. doi:10.22550/REP75-1-2017-05
  • Korhonen AM, Lakkala M, Veermans M (2019). Identifying vocational student teachers' competence using an ePortfolio. Eur J Workplace Innov. doi:10.46364/ejwi.v5i1.512
  • Korhonen AM, Ruhalahti S, Niinimäki J (2020). Finnish vocational teachers' competences made visible by open badges. J High Educ Theory Pract. doi:10.33423/jhetp.v20i6.3138
  • Lang J (2023). Workforce upskilling: can universities meet the challenges of lifelong learning?. Int J Inf Learn Technol. doi:10.1108/ijilt-01-2023-0001
  • Lee K (2020). Who opens online distance education, to whom, and for what?. Distance Educ. doi:10.1080/01587919.2020.1757404
  • Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  • Littlejohn A, Hood N (2017). How educators build knowledge and expand their practice: the case of open education resources. Br J Educ Technol. doi:10.1111/bjet.12438
  • Lyu D (2023). Harnessing micro-credentials to innovate teaching in the Open University of China: opportunities and challenges. Creat Educ. doi:10.4236/ce.2023.145058
  • Mah DK (2016). Learning analytics and digital badges: potential impact on student retention in higher education. Tech Know Learn. doi:10.1007/s10758-016-9286-8
  • McDaniel R (2016). A taxonomy for digital badge design in medical technologies. doi:10.1109/SeGAH.2016.7586254
  • McNamara B, Sun Q (2021). Micro-credentialing in adult learning: international considerations.
  • Miller KK, Jorre de St Jorre T (2024). Digital micro-credentials in environmental science: an employer perspective on valued evidence of skills. Teach High Educ. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2053953
  • Misiaszek GW (2018). Educating the global environmental citizen: understanding ecopedagogy in local and global contexts.
  • Misiaszek GW (2020). Ecopedagogy: teaching critical literacies of 'development', 'sustainability', and 'sustainable development'. Teach High Educ. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1586668
  • Oliver B (2019). Making micro-credentials work for learners, employers and providers.
  • Orr D, Weller M, Farrow R (2019). How is digitalisation affecting the flexibility and openness of higher education provision? Results of a global survey using a new conceptual model. J Interact Media Educ. doi:10.5334/jime.523
  • Perkins J, Pryor M (2021). Digital badges: pinning down employer challenges. J Teach Learn Grad Employ. doi:10.21153/jtlge2021vol12no1art1027
  • Pollard V, Vincent A (2022). Micro-credentials: a postdigital counternarrative. Postdigit Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s42438-022-00311-6
  • Ramirez-Montoya MS (2020). Challenges for open education with educational innovation: a systematic literature review. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su12177053
  • Ramirez-Montoya MS, Martínez-Pérez S, Rodriguez-Abitia G (2022). Digital accreditations in MOOC-based training on sustainability: factors that influence terminal efficiency. Australas J Educ Technol. doi:10.14742/ajet.7082
  • Randall DL, Farmer T, West RE (2019). Effectiveness of undergraduate instructional design assistants in scaling a teacher education open badge system. Contemp Issues Technol Teach Educ.
  • Rollin B (2021). L'open-badge: un outil au service de l'évaluation et de la reconnaissance de compétences transversales dans l'enseignement supérieur?. Evaluer. Journal international de recherche en education et formation. doi:10.48782/e-jiref-7-3-73
  • Rollin B (2022). L'évaluation par open-badges dans l'enseignement supérieur: les enjeux méthodologiques relevés lors d'une expérimentation.
  • Roy S, Clark D (2019). Digital badges, do they live up to the hype?. Br J Educ Technol. doi:10.1111/bjet.12709
  • Schmidt JP, Geith C, Håklev S (2009). Peer-to-peer recognition of learning in open education. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.641
  • Selvaratnam RM, Sankey M (2021). An integrative literature review of the implementation of micro-credentials in higher education: implications for practice in Australasia. J Teach Learn Grad Employ. doi:10.21153/jtlge2021vol12no1art942
  • Sousa-Vieira ME, Ferrero-Castro D, López-Ardao JC (2021). Design, development and use of a digital badges system in higher education. Appl Sci. doi:10.3390/app12010220
  • Sobel D (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms & communities.
  • Tamoliune G, Greenspon R, Tereseviciene M (2023). Exploring the potential of micro-credentials: a systematic literature review. Front Educ. doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.1006811
  • Tereseviciene M, Trepule E, Dauksiene E (2020). Are universities ready to recognize Open Online Learning?. Int Educ Stud. doi:10.5539/ies.v13n2p21
  • Tomić B, Jovanović J, Milikić N (2024). Open badges and achievement goal orientation: a study with high-performing student programmers. J Comput High Educ. doi:10.1007/s12528-023-09365-2
  • Trepulé E, Volungeviciené A, Tereseviciené M (2021). How to increase the value of digital badges for assessment and recognition in higher education. A university case. Inform Educ. doi:10.15388/infedu.2021.07
  • van de Laar M, West RE, Cosma P (2024). The value of educational microcredentials in open access online education: a doctoral education case. Open Learn J Open Distance e-Learn. doi:10.1080/02680513.2022.2072721
  • Varadarajan S, Koh JHL, Daniel BK (2023). A systematic review of the opportunities and challenges of micro-credentials for multiple stakeholders: learners, employers, higher education institutions and government. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00381-x
  • Volungevičienė A, Teresevičienė M, Ehlers UD (2020). When is open and online learning relevant for curriculum change in higher education? Digital and network society perspective. Electron J E-Learn. doi:10.34190/EJEL.20.18.1.007
  • Werth E, Williams K (2022). The why of open pedagogy: a value-first conceptualization for enhancing instructor praxis. Smart Learn Environ. doi:10.1186/s40561-022-00191-0
  • West RE, Cheng Z (2023). Digital credential evolution. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_71
  • Wolz E, Gottlieb M, Pongratz H (2021). Digital credentials in higher education institutions: a literature review. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86800-0_9
  • Zawacki-Richter O, Conrad D, Bozkurt A (2020). Elements of open education: an invitation to future research. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4659