Signal Alignment Theory: A Harmonic Interpretation of Systems and a Diagnostic Method for Coherence
Description
Signal Alignment Theory outlines a universal pattern framework rooted in wave dynamics, identifying a core set of seven conserved patterns and five additional semi-conserved patterns. The conserved patterns are present in all coherent systems, while the semi-conserved patterns occur selectively, often signaling adaptability or transition. These patterns emerge across all systems of scale, from atomic to societal, due to the recursive nature of waves. That is, their tendency to produce patterns that reinforce or transform across scales. Central to this framework is the role of signal: how clearly structured information emerges from noise, how it aligns, and how its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) governs system stability. This paper introduces the theory and provides a diagnostic structure for identifying, mapping, and analyzing perturbation patterns in complex systems. This approach offers a foundational lens for recognizing emergent instability before it cascades, and for recalibrating systems toward sustained coherence.
Files
Signal_Alignment_Theory_FULL.pdf
Files
(5.0 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:b457cf04da2e59e7ad25d2a6f37623db
|
5.0 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
- Turner, M. G., Hargrove, W. W., & Gardner, R. H. (2020). Multiple methods confirm wetland restoration improves ecosystem function. Remote Sensing, 16(21), Article 4062. (mdpi.com)
- Stone, J. V. (2014). Using reaction times and binary responses to estimate psychophysical performance: An information theoretic analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 35. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00035(Frontiers)
- Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
- Whitmer, W. M., McShefferty, D., & Akeroyd, M. A. (2016). On detectable and meaningful speech intelligibility benefits. In P. van Dijk, D. Başkent, E. Gaudrain, E. de Kleine, A. Wagner, & C. Lanting (Eds.), Physiology, Psychoacoustics and Cognition in Normal and Impaired Hearing (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol. 894, pp. 447–455). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_47 (DOI)
- McShefferty, D., Whitmer, W. M., & Akeroyd, M. A. (2016). The just meaningful difference in speech to noise ratio. Trends in Hearing, 20, 2331216515626570. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515626570 (PubMed)
- Gammaitoni, L., Hänggi, P., Jung, P., & Marchesoni, F. (1998). Stochastic resonance. Reviews of Modern Physics, 70(1), 223–287. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.223 (Physical Review Link, Physical Review Journals)