"Such Is the Republic": Vicissitudes in Atatürk's Anticipation of Post-Ottoman Turkey
Description
Over the course of the Turkish War of Independence (1919-1923), Mustafa Kemal Atatürk–a former officer of the Ottoman Army–assumed leadership of the Turkish National Movement and became the first president of the Republic following its victory. In 1927, Atatürk recounted the war and his ascent to power in a seven-day address to the first congress of his Republican People’s Party. Immediately upon its delivery, this speech, “Nutuk,” became a state-sanctioned account of Turkey’s national history, and it has largely been treated as authoritative by sympathetic historians in the years since. Despite Nutuk’s ostensible influence on Kemalist history, however, two characteristics of the speech set it apart from subsequent instalments in the tradition. Firstly, it acknowledges that the Republic as it stood at the time was neither a product of premeditated ideological engineering nor purely a convenience of the postwar political climate. This nuance is most apparent in Atatürk’s denunciation of the office of Sultan-Caliph, which is initially muted and only later overt, and in his treatment of territorial severances, which he reimagines as necessary to bring about a desired ethnic homogeneity and thus preferable even if imposed by defeat. Secondly, Atatürk’s account of Turkey’s founding, which otherwise argues the gradual severance of the Ottoman and Turkish regimes, is complicated by his denial of the ethnic cleansing of Armenians between 1915 and 1921. Because it defends proponents of the old order and betrays a sympathy with it in doing so, Kemal’s twofold justification and obfuscation of genocide committed under the Ottomans suspends the narrative of growing Ottoman-Turkish dissonance that characterises the speech at large. These two facets of Nutuk illustrate how the document is more conservative in its claims about Turkey’s political and ideological foundation than the Kemalist histories that draw upon it.
Files
KONYAR_Such_Is_the_Republic_CJPA.pdf
Files
(256.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:057f470312d5713f395ff1b93c1acc0b
|
256.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Primary Source: Atatürk, M. K. (2019). The Great Speech. Edited by Roman Shtefura, Gamze Üney, Burak Irmak, Güneş Işıksel, Aleks Matyosoğlu, Beyza Ertem, Merve Demir, & Pelin Arda. Istanbul: Dante Publishing. Secondary Literature: Adak, H. (2003). 'National Myths and Self-Na(rra)tions: Mustafa Kemal's Nutuk and Halide Edib's Memoirs and the Turkish Ordeal', South Atlantic Quarterly 102(2), pp. 509-527. Aksin, S. (2011). Essays in Ottoman-Turkish Political History. Piscataway: Gorgias Press. Atakuman, Ç. (2008). 'Cradle or Crucible: Anatolia and Archaeology in the Early Years of the Turkish Republic (1923-1938)', Journal of Social Archaeology 8(2), pp. 214-235. Batuman, B. (2010). 'The Shape of the Nation: Visual Production of Nationalism Through Maps in Turkey', Political Geography 29, pp. 220-234. Deniz, D. (2020). 'Re-Assessing the Genocide of Kurdish Alevis in Dersim, 1937-38', Genocide Studies and Prevention 14(2), pp. 20–43. Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2024). 'Mehmed VI', in Encyclopaedia Britannica. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. Kévorkian, R. (2021). 'The Final Phase: The Cleansing of Armenian and Greek Survivors, 1919–1922', in Astourian, S. and Kévorkian R. (eds.) Collective and State Violence in Turkey: The Construction of a National Identity from Empire to Nation-State. New York: Berghahn, pp. 147-173. Klein, J. (2011). The Margins of Empire: Kurdish Militias in the Ottoman Tribal Zone. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. Leupold, D. (2020). Embattled Dreamlands: The Politics of Contesting Armenian, Kurdish, and Turkish Memory. London: Routledge. Low, D. (2022). Picturing the Ottoman Armenian World. London: I.B. Taurus. Mango, A. (1999). Atatürk. London: John Murray. Müge Gökçek, F. (2008). 'Through a Glass Darkly: Consequences of a Politicized Past in Contemporary Turkey', The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 617(1), pp. 88-106. Nezi̇roğlu, İ. (2015). Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi [Turkish Grand National Congress]. Ankara: GNAT Press, Publications and Public Relations Department. Philliou, C. (2018). Turkey: A Past Against History. Berkeley: University of California Press. Sancaktar, F. (2020). 'Determinations About the Delegates of the Sivas Congress (4-11 September 1919)', [Türk] Tarih Dergisi 71, pp. 473-96. Şekeryan, A. (2020). 'Rethinking the Turkish-Armenian War in the Caucasus: The Position of Ottoman Armenians', War in History 27(1), pp. 81-105. Sipahi, A. (2018). 'Narrative Construction in the 1895 Massacres in Harput: The Coming and Disappearance of the Kurds', Études Arméniennes Contemporaines 10, pp. 63-95. Thompson, E. (2004). 'Ferit, Damat Mehmet [1853–1923]', in Mattar, P. (ed.) Encyclopedia of the Modern Middle East and North Africa. New York: Macmillan Reference, p. 823. Turanoğlu, B. (2017). The Formation of Turkish Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Üngör, U. Ü. (2012). 'Disastrous Decade: Armenians and Kurds in the Young Turk Era, 1915–25', in Jongerden, J. and Verheij, J. (eds) Social Relations in Ottoman Diyarbekir, 1870–1915. Leiden: Brill, pp. 267-295. Yavuz, H. (2001). 'Five Stages of the Construction of Kurdish Nationalism in Turkey', Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 7(3) pp. 1-24. Zeydanlioğlu, W. (2012). 'Turkey's Kurdish Language Policy', International Journal of the Sociology of Language 38(217), pp. 99–125. Zürcher, E. J. (2011). 'Renewal and Silence', in Gökçek, F. M. and Naimark, N. (eds.) A Question of Genocide: Armenians and Turks at the End of the Ottoman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 306-16. Zürcher, E. J. (2003). 'The Young Turks––Children of the Borderlands?', in Kemal, H. K. and Zens, R. W. (eds) Ottoman Borderlands: Issues, Personalities, and Political Changes. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 275-286. Zürcher, E. J. (1986). 'Young Turk Memoirs as a Historical Source: Kazim Karabekir's Istiklal Harbimiz', Middle Eastern Studies 22(4), pp. 562-70.