Published July 24, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Environmental spatial assessment at ranch scale: a tool for optimizing livestock management in Argentine forests

  • 1. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria), Unidad Ejecutora IFAB UEDD (INTA–CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina|Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 2. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 3. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria), Unidad Ejecutora IFAB UEDD (INTA–CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
  • 4. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina|Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria), Unidad Ejecutora IFAB UEDD (INTA–CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
  • 5. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria), Unidad Ejecutora IFAB UEDD (INTA–CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina|Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina|Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina
  • 6. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina|Centro de Investigación Científica y de Transferencia Tecnológica a La Producción (CICYTTP, CONICET-UADER- Gob. De Entre Ríos), Diamante, Argentina

Description

Question: Effective environmental management depends on accurate and efficient assessments of ecological conditions. This study introduces a method that combines remote sensing with a Rapid Assessment Method (RAM) to evaluate the environmental status of land units at the ranch scale. We ask whether this integrated approach can generate spatially explicit information to support the implementation and monitoring of sustainable livestock grazing in native forests. Study area: The study was conducted in three livestock ranches in Argentina. These ranches encompass heterogeneous landscapes characterized by varying soil types, vegetation cover, and topographic features that influence ecological conditions. Methods: Remote sensing imagery was used to delineate Ecological Sites (ESi) based on bio-geomorphic attributes such as soil, topography, and vegetation. These spatial units guided field sampling, where RAM was applied to assess environmental indicators. Field data were integrated into an Environmental Health Index (EHI), summarizing the ecological status of each ESi. Ordinary kriging interpolated EHI values across the landscape, enabling spatial visualization of environmental health patterns and spatial variability. Results: Mapping of EHI values showed that most land units exhibited intermediate to high environmental health, suggesting generally favorable ecological conditions across the ranches. However, some areas had low EHI values associated with signs of disturbance or degradation, including fire, flooding, invasive species, or overgrazing. Conclusions: The integration of remote sensing with RAM provided a detailed overview of ecological conditions at the ranch scale. The results can guide more focused and efficient fieldwork in areas requiring closer monitoring due to potential environmental degradation or changes linked to livestock management. This approach supports the implementation and evaluation of sustainable grazing management in native forests, offering a robust, scalable tool for environmental assessment. Additionally, by optimizing the allocation of sampling effort, it enables more informed decision-making to maintain and enhance ecological health in these production systems.

Taxonomic reference: Anton and Zuloaga (2023).

Abbreviations: EHI = environmental health index; ESi = ecological site; RAM = rapid assessment methodology; MBGI = silvo pastoral or forest management with integrated livestock.

Files

VCS_article_141917.pdf

Files (5.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e181f634a79ac53b119ae2d4b72ffa54
4.7 MB Preview Download
md5:964b92e96223dfef0f5e891e6ce4569f
243.3 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Acharya RP, Maraseni T, Cockfield G (2019) Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation–An analysis of publications. Ecosystem Services 39: 100979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100979
  • Akkala A, Devabhaktuni V, Kumar A (2010) Interpolation techniques and associated software for environmental data. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 29: 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10455
  • Alaggia F, Carranza C, Pons D, Cavallero L, López D (2020) Delimitación de Sitios Ecológicos en el Valle de Traslasierra (Córdoba) a través de Google Earth Engine. 4to Congreso Internacional del Gran Chaco Americano. Territorio e Innovación. Santiago del Estero, AR.
  • Anton AM, Zuloaga FO (2023) Flora Argentina. http://www.floraargentina.edu.ar [accessed 30 Mar 2023]
  • Arétouyap Z, Njandjock Nouck P, Nouayou R, Ghomsi Kemgang FE, Piépi Toko AD, Asfahani J (2016) Lessening the adverse effect of the semivariogram model selection on an interpolative survey using kriging technique. SpringerPlus 5: 549. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2142-4
  • Asa E, Saafi M, Membah J, Bila A (2011) Comparisson of linear and nonlinear kriging methods for characterization and interpolation of soil data. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 26: 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000118
  • Beha Ambiental (2015) Auditoría Ambiental Ampliada Estancia Tres Lagos. Filo Huahum. Administración de Parques Nacionales, AR, 147 pp.
  • Bestelmeyer BT, Tugel AJ, Peacock Jr GL, Robinett DG, Shaver PL, Brown JR, Herrick JE, Sanchez H, Havstad KM (2009) State-and-transition models for heterogeneous landscapes: A strategy for development and application. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2111/08-146
  • Bestelmeyer BT, Ash A, Brown JR, Densambuu B, Fernández-Giménez M, Johanson J, Levi M, Lopez D, Peinetti R, … Shaver P (2017) State and Transition Models: theory, applications, and challenges. In: Briske DD (Ed.) Rangeland systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, CH, 303–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2_9
  • Bianchi AR, Cravero SAC (2010) Atlas climático digital de la República Argentina. INTA Ediciones, 51.
  • Bianchi E, Villalba R, Viale M, Couvreux F, Marticorena R (2016) New precipitation and temperature grids for northern Patagonia: Advances in relation to global climate grids. Journal of Meteorological Research 30: 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-015-5058-y
  • Bonilla-Cedrez C, Steward P, Rosenstock TS, Thornton P, Arango J, Kropff M, Ramirez-Villegas J (2023) Priority areas for investment in more sustainable and climate-resilient livestock systems. Nature Sustainability 6: 1279–1286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01161-1
  • Borrelli LB, Diez JP, Varela SA (2023) Evaluación de dieta de herbívoros en sitios piloto de Manejo del Bosque con Ganadería Integrada (MBGI) de Patagonia Norte. VIII Congreso Forestal Latinoamericano, V Congreso Forestal Argentino. Mendoza, 27 al 30 de marzo de 2023.
  • Brown A, Martinez Ortiz U, Acerbi M, Corcuera J (2006) La Situación Ambiental Argentina 2005. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires, AR. https://www.vidasilvestre.org.ar/?2340/La-Situacin-Ambiental-Argentina-2005
  • Calle Z, Murgueitio E, Chará J (2012) Integrating forestry, sustainable cattle-ranching and landscape restoration. Unasylva 63: 31–40.
  • Carranza C, Daniele G, Cabello MJ, Peri PL (2015) Indicadores para el monitoreo a escala predial en el marco del Manejo de Bosques con Ganadería Integrada (MBGI). Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca (MAGyP)-Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable (SAyDS) de la Nación-INTA.
  • Carranza CA, Peri PL, Navall M (2019) Manual de indicadores para monitoreo de planes prediales MBGI. Región Parque Chaqueño. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), AR, 90 pp.
  • Casermeiro J, Spahn E (2000) Evaluación y guía de condición del bosque nativo entrerriano. Multequina 9: 147–153. [ISSN 0327-9375].
  • CIEFAP-MAyDS (2016) Actualización de la Clasificación de Tipos Forestales y Cobertura del Suelo de la Región Bosque Andino Patagónico. Informe Final. CIEFAP. https://bit.ly/CTFCS_2013
  • Creque JA, Bassett SD, West NE (1999) Delineating ecological sites. Rangeland Ecology and Management 52: 546–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003622
  • da Silva Charles T, Rocha Lopes T, Nascimento Duarte S, Garcia Nascimento J, de Carvalho Ricardo H, Bicioni Pacheco A (2022) Estimating average annual rainfall by ordinary kriging and TRMM precipitation products in midwestern Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 118: 103937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2022.103937
  • Davis CR, Belote RT, Williamson MA, Larson AJ, Esch BE (2016) A rapid forest assessment method for multiparty monitoring across landscapes. Journal of Forestry 114: 125–133. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-118
  • De Marzo T, Pflugmacher D, Baumann M, Lambin EF, Gasparri I, Kuemmerle T (2021) Characterizing forest disturbances across the Argentine Dry Chaco based on Landsat time series. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 98: 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102310
  • del Río-Mena T, Willemen L, Tesfamariam GT, Beukes O, Nelson A (2020) Remote sensing for mapping ecosystem services to support evaluation of ecological restoration interventions in an arid landscape. Ecological Indicators 113: 106182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106182
  • FAO (2022) The state of the world's rorests 2022: Forest pathways to sustainable development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/cb9368en/cb9368en.pdf
  • Farmer WH (2016) Ordinay kriging as a tool to estimate historically daily streamflow records. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 20: 2721–2735. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2721-2016
  • Fennessy MS, Jacobs AD, Kentula ME (2007) An evaluation of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands. Wetlands 27: 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[543:AEORMF]2.0.CO;2
  • Gewin V (2002) Ecosystem health: The state of the planet. Nature 417: 112–114. https://doi.org/10.1038/417112a
  • Gibbens RP, McNeely RP, Havstad KM, Beck RF, Nolan B (2005) Vegetation changes in the Jornada Basin from 1858 to 1998. Journal of Arid Environments 61: 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.001
  • Giraldo R, Delicado P, Mateu J (2011) Ordinary kriging for function-valued spatial data. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 18: 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-010-0143-y
  • Grill G, Lehner B, Thieme M, Geenen B, Tickner D, Antonelli F, Babu S, Borrelli P, Cheng L, … Zarfl C (2019) Mapping the world's free-flowing rivers. Nature 569: 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9
  • Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RM (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41: 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  • Guerra CA, Maes J, Geijzendorffer I, Metzger MJ (2016) An assessment of soil erosion prevention by vegetation in Mediterranean Europe: Current trends of ecosystem service provision. Ecological Indicators 60: 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.043
  • IPCC (2023) Climate change (2023) impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
  • Ireland AW, Drohan PJ (2014) Rapid delineation of preliminary ecological sites applied to forested northern appalachian landscapes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 79: 185–192. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.06.0271
  • Kambhammettu BVNP, Allena P, King JP (2011) Application and evaluation of universal kriging for optimal contouring of groundwater levels. Journal of Earth System Science 120: 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0075-4
  • Kangas AS, Leskinen P, Pykäläinen J, Kurttila M (2019) Participatory environmental management research: A process approach. Journal of Environmental Management 234: 1–12.
  • Kerr JT, Ostrovsky M (2003) From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00071-5
  • Lackey RT (2001) Values, policy, and ecosystem health. Bioscience 51: 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0437:VPAEH]2.0.CO;2
  • Lehner B, Verdin K, Jarvis A (2008) New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos (Washington, D.C. ) 89: 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO100001
  • Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE (2009) Adaptive monitoring: A new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 482–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.005
  • Loiseau E, Roux P, Junqua G, Bellon-Maurel V (2012) Environmental assessment of a territory: An overview of existing tools and methods. Journal of Environmental Management 112: 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.024
  • Maynard JJ, Karl JW (2017) A hypertemporal remote sensing protocol for high resolution mapping of ecological sites. PLoS ONE 12: e0175201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175201
  • Mendez M, Calvo-Valverde LA (2016) Assessing the performance of several rainfall interpolation methods as evaluated by a conceptual hydrological model. Procedia Engineering 154: 1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.595
  • Mohr-Bell D, Díaz G, Príncipe R, Gonzalez C, Bono J, Ciuffoli L, Strada M, Parmuchi G, Chomnalez F, … Bava J (2019) Monitoreo de la Superficie de Bosque Nativo de la República Argentina, Región Forestal Bosque Andino Patagónico. Tomo I Informe. Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nación. Esquel (Chubut), AR, 87 pp.
  • Morello J, Mateucci SD, Rodríguez AF, Silva ME (2012) Ecoregiones y complejos ecosistémicos argentinos. Orientación Gráfica editora, Buenos Aires, AR.
  • Mori A, Lertzman KP, Gustafsson L (2017) Biodeivesrity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12669
  • Munyati C, Sinthumule NI (2021) Comparative suitability of ordinary kriging and Inverse Distance Weighted interpolation for indicating intactness gradients on threatened savannah woodland and forest stands. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 12: 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100151
  • Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffman A, Giovannini E (2005) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper 2005/03. https://doi.org/10.1787/533411815016
  • NASA JPL (2020) NASADEM Merged DEM Global 1 arc second V001 [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center. [Accessed 2024-07-22 from] https://doi.org/10.5067/MEaSUREs/NASADEM/NASADEM_HGT.001
  • National Ecological Site Handbook (2019) National Ecological Site Handbook. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/guides-and-instructions/national-ecological-site-handbook [accessed 12 Jan 2023]
  • Navall M, Peri PL, Merletti G, Monaco M, Carranza C, Medina A (2016) Acuerdo MBGI: Una iniciativa para devolver el significado a los Sistemas Silvopastoriles sobre bosques nativos. Quipu Forestal 2: 20–21.
  • Navarro MF, Navarro CS, Barrios R, Calamari N, Dieta V, García Martínez G, Iturralde Elortegui MR, Kurtz DB, Michard NJ, Sica Y (2022) Mapa de distribución potencial de humedales en Argentina. Informe técnico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, AR.
  • Nellemann C, MacDevette M, Manders T, Eickhout B, Svihus B, Prins AG, Kaltenborn BP (2009) The environmental food crisis – The environment's role in averting future food crises. A UNEP rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme. GRID-Arendal, Birkeland Trykkeri, NO.
  • Nouck PN, Kenfack C, Diab AD, Njeudjang K, Meli LJ, Kamesu R (2013) A geostatistical re-interpretation of gravity surveys in the Yagoua, Cameroon region. Geophysical Journal International 52: 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7169(13)71483-1
  • NRC National Research Council (1994) Rangeland health: New methods to classify, inventory, and monitor rangelands. National Academy Press, Washington DC, US.
  • Oliver MA, Webster R (2014) A tutorial guide to geostatistics: Computing and modelling variograms and kriging. Catena 113: 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.09.006
  • Oliver M, Webster R (2015) Basics steps in geostatistics: The variogram and kriging. Springer Briefs in Agriculture. Springer, Cham, CH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15865-5
  • Papanastasis VP (2009) Sustainable management of Mediterranean rangelands and forests. The Science of the Total Environment 407: 2452–2460.
  • Pellant M, Shaver P, Pyke DA, Herrick JE (2005) Interpreting indicators of rangeland health, Version 4. Technical Reference 1734-6. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center, Denver, CO, US, 122 pp.
  • Pellant M, Shaver PL, Pyke DA, Herrick JE, Lepak N, Riegel G, Kachergis E, Newingham BA, Toledo D, Busby FE (2020) Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 5. Tech Ref 1734-6. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Operations Center, Denver, CO, US.
  • Peri PL, Raffaele E (2016) Manejo de Bosque con Ganadería Integrada (MBGI). CIEFAP.
  • Peri PL, Banegas N, Gasparri I, Carranza C, Rossner MB, Martínez Pastur G, Cavallero L, López D, Loto L, Piñeiro G (2018) Secuestro de carbono en sistemas silvopastoriles templados, Argentina. Actas IV Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles. Ediciones INTA, Neuquén, AR, 64–68.
  • Peri PL, Rusch V, Von Müller A, Varela S, Quinteros P, Martínez Pastur G (2021) Manual de Indicadores para Monitoreo de Planes Prediales de Manejo de Bosque con Ganadería Integrada – MBGI Región Patagónica. Editorial INTA-MAyDS, AR, 167 pp.
  • Peri PL, Rosas YM, Lopez DR, Lencinas MV, Cavallero L, Martínez Pastur GJ (2022) Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests. Asociación Argentina de Ecología, AR. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.2.1.1872
  • Pettorelli N, Laurance WF, O'Brien TG, Wegmann M, Nagendra H, Turner W (2014) Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 839–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12261
  • Plan Mapa de Suelos INTA (1986) Carta de Suelos de la República Argentina. Departamento Feliciano, provincia de Entre Ríos. Memoria técnica, con mapa de suelos y de vegetación natural a esc. Aprox. 1:100.000. Convenio INTA-Gobierno de Entre Ríos. INTA, E.E.A. Paraná, AR, 96 pp.
  • Rapport D (1998) Defining ecosystem health. In: Rapport D, Costanza R, Epstein PR, Gaudet C, Levins R. Ecosystem health. Blackwell Science, London, UK, 18–33.
  • Reales F, Ali SM, Alonso JM (2021) Reserva de Usos Múltiples "El Carayá". Plan de Manejo 2022–2026. Reporte técnico. Áreas Naturales Protegidas, Entre Ríos, AR, 143 pp.
  • Rhodes EC, Perotto-Baldivieso HL, Reeves MC, Gonzalez LA (2022) Perspectives on the Special Issue for Applications of Remote Sensing for Livestock and Grazingland Management. Remote Sensing 14: 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14081882
  • Rusch VE, Varela SA (2019) Bases Para El Manejo De Bosques Nativos Con Ganadería En Patagonia Norte. Parte I. Ediciones INTA, Buenos Aires, AR, 160 pp.
  • Rusch VE, Rusch GM, Goijman AP, Varela S, Claps L (2017) Los servicios ecosistémicos como soporte para la toma de decisiones ambiental y socialmente sustentables. Ecología Austral 27: 162–176. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.17.27.1.1.295
  • Rush V, Cavallero L, López DR (2016) El Modelo de Estados y Transiciones como herramienta para la aplicación de la Ley de Bosques. Centro de Investigación y Extensión Forestal Andino Patagónica. Patagonia Forestal 1: 20–27. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.17.27.2.0.240
  • Sabattini JA, Sabattini RA (2019) Área Natural Protegida. Reserva de Usos Múltiples. Estancia "El Carayá". Producción, conservación y recuperación de ecosistemas en el Espinal Argentino. Rafaela, AR, 214 pp.
  • Sabattini RA, Wilson MG, Muzzachiodi N, Dorsch AF (1999) Guía para la caracterización de agroecosistemas del centro-norte de Entre Ríos. Revista Científica Agropecuaria 3: 7–19.
  • Sabattini JA, Boschetti G, Sabattini RA, Quintero C, Hernández JO, Befani R (2015) Vegetation units of native forest, according to soil conditions (Entre Ríos, Argentina). Avances en Investigación Agraria 19: 79–96. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.19.296
  • Sayre R, Roca E, Sedaghatkish G, Young B, Keel S, Roca R, Sheppard S (2000) Nature in focus: Rapid Ecological Assessments. The Nature Conservancy. Island Press. Washington DC, US, 182 pp.
  • Sharaff A, Sinha GR (2021) Data science and its applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, US, 378 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003102380
  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2009) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators 9: 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011
  • UNEP (2021) Global environmental outlook: Regional assessments. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-environment-outlook-regional-assessments
  • van Groenigen JW (2000) The influence of variogram parameters on optimal sampling schemes for mapping by kriging. Geoderma 97: 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00040-9
  • Varela SA, Diez JP, Raffo F, Umaña FJ, Trinco FD (2022) Determinación de Sitios ecológicos y Estados de referencia en bosques degradados de Coihue; Ciprés; Ñire; Lenga y Araucaria de Patagonia Norte. VI Jornadas Forestales Patagónicas Actas VI Jornadas Forestales Patagónicas: El rol de los bosques en un mundo diferente. Viedma, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. San Carlos de Bariloche, AR, 376 pp.
  • Varela S, Diez JP, Gazotti JI, Valiña P, Furlan N, Cardozo A, Cancino AK, Fariña CM, Castillo DA, Peri PL (2023) Manejo de Bosques con Ganadería Integrada en Patagonia argentina: Ajuste metodológico para la determinación de la línea de base en ecosistemas complejos y paisajes heterogéneos. Bosque (Valdivia) 44: 255–259. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-92002023000100255
  • Xia Y, Sanderman J, Watts JD, Machmuller MB, Ewing S, Rivard C (2024) Leveraging legacy data with targeted field sampling for low-cost mapping of soil organic carbon stocks on extensive rangeland properties. Geoderma 448: 116952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116952
  • Xie Y, Sarma A, Vogt A, Andrew A, Zvoleff A, Al-Zubaidi A, Simon A, Atkins A, Wolen A, … Kamvar ZA (2024) knitr: A general-purpose package for dynamic report generation in R. R package version 1.49. https://yihui.org/knitr