Published July 31, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

AI Security in Public vs. Private Sectors: Overcoming Implementation Challenges

Authors/Creators

Description

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing cybersecurity, enabling faster threat detection and proactive defense mechanisms. However, the adoption of AI-driven security solutions varies dramatically between public-sector institutions (e.g., government agencies, universities) and private-sector organizations (e.g., financial tech firms, e-commerce platforms). These differences stem from contrasting priorities, regulatory landscapes, and infrastructural capabilities.

This study examines the key challenges each sector faces when integrating AI into their security frameworks. Speed and scalability are very important for private businesses, but budget limits and legal concerns (such GDPR and PCI-DSS) make adoption harder. At the same time, public institutions have problems with bureaucratic inertia, old IT systems, and the necessity for AI decision-making to be open. We find sector-specific problems and suggest solutions that are suited to each area by using a mixed-methods approach that includes real-world case studies, interviews with cybersecurity experts, and performance benchmarking.

Our results show a clear split: private companies are better at quickly adopting AI, but they typically don't have enough governance protections. On the other hand, public organizations put accountability first, which means they take longer to implement. To fill this gap, we present an adaptive framework that makes AI security solutions fit the needs of each sector. We suggest that private companies use modular, cloud-based AI technologies that are affordable and can grow with their needs. We support incremental modernization and policy-driven AI governance in the public sector to keep the public's trust while making things safer.

This study gives cybersecurity professionals, policymakers, and IT administrators useful information they can use to deal with the problems that come up when integrating AI. By understanding these distinctions between sectors, companies can set up security systems that are more effective and aware of their surroundings. This will make defenses stronger in a world where threats are becoming more AI-driven.

Files

EJAET-11-7-42-48.pdf

Files (346.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ebc84ffba4b5bdf4cd6a6d6febf8cdaf
346.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • [1]. A. K. Singh and R. K. Sharma, "Adaptive AI-Driven Cybersecurity for Private Enterprises: Challenges and Opportunities," IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 16, pp. 4321–4335, 2021. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2021.3097321.
  • [2]. L. M. García et al., "Public-Sector AI Adoption: Barriers and Solutions for Cybersecurity Modernization," IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 112305–112321, 2022. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3206781.
  • [3]. J. Zhang and H. Li, "Evolution of AI-Based Cybersecurity Systems: From Rule-Based to Deep Learning Approaches," IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 45-58, 2021. doi: 10.1109/MSEC.2021.3059392.
  • [4]. M. Chen et al., "Cloud-Native AI Security: Architectures and Challenges," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1124-1139, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TCC.2022.3161078.
  • [5]. R. Patel and S. Kim, "AI Cybersecurity in Financial Services: Compliance Challenges and Adaptive Solutions," IEEE Transactions on Emerging Technologies in Computing, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 210–225, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TETC.2022.3187021.
  • [6]. E. Müller et al., "Public-Sector AI Security Adoption: A Study of Institutional Barriers," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 145832–145851, 2021. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3123015.
  • [7]. A. Gupta and L. Wang, "Modular AI for Cybersecurity: Balancing Speed and Compliance in Financial Services," IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 512–528, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2022.3223131.
  • [8]. T. Novak et al., "Public-Sector AI Modernization: Policy-Aware Strategies for Secure Adoption," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1047–1062, 2023. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2023.3273689.
  • [9]. K. Zhang and M. Chen, "Neuromorphic AI for Next-Generation Cybersecurity," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 789–802, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3211455.
  • [10]. R. Williams et al., "Generative AI for Proactive Cyber Defense: Opportunities and Challenges," IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 55–68, 2023. doi: 10.1109/MSEC.2023.3267428.