Published July 30, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Emotional Intelligence vs Artificial Intelligence in Teaching: A Conceptual Analysis

Authors/Creators

Description

Abstract

 

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational settings has sparked significant debate about the balance between technological advancement and human emotional competencies in teaching. This conceptual paper examines the interplay between emotional intelligence (EI) and artificial intelligence in educational contexts, analysing their respective roles, strengths, and limitations. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, this study explores how emotional intelligence serves as a fundamental component of effective teaching, encompassing empathy, social awareness, and relationship management, while artificial intelligence offers unprecedented capabilities in personalized learning, data analysis, and content delivery. The paper investigates the potential synergies between these two forms of intelligence, considering how they might complement rather than compete with each other in modern educational environments. Key findings suggest that while AI excels in processing information, providing consistent feedback, and accommodating diverse learning styles, emotional intelligence remains irreplaceable in fostering meaningful teacher-student relationships, understanding cultural nuances, and addressing complex emotional and social needs of learners. The analysis reveals that the most effective educational approaches likely involve a balanced integration of both EI and AI, where technology enhances rather than replaces human emotional competencies. This paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on educational innovation by proposing a framework for understanding how emotional and artificial intelligence can coexist and collaborate in teaching environments, ultimately enhancing educational outcomes while preserving the essential human elements of learning and development.

Files

Files (53.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c6a303ecb9092d6804efc4de0cd4fec0
53.5 kB Download

Additional details

Identifiers

ISSN
2581-9100

Related works

Is published in
Journal article: 2581-9100 (ISSN)

Dates

Accepted
2025-07-30

References

  • • Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207. • Baker, R. S., &Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics: From research to practice (pp. 61-75). Springer. • Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052-1092. • Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence. Psicothema, 18, 13-25. • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. • Brackett, M. A., &Katulak, N. A. (2007). Emotional intelligence in the classroom: Skill-based training for teachers and students. In J. Ciarrochi& J. D. Mayer (Eds.), Applying emotional intelligence (pp. 1-27). Psychology Press. • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press. • Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Wiley. • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press. • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press. • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. • D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 145-157. • Drachsler, H., &Kalz, M. (2016). The MOOC and learning analytics innovation cycle: A reflective summary of ongoing research and its challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 281-290. • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. • Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson. • Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press. • Guskey, T. R. (2020). On your mark: Challenging the conventions of grading and reporting. Solution Tree Press. • Hen, M., & Sharabi-Nov, A. (2014). Teaching the teachers: Emotional intelligence training for teachers. Teaching Education, 25(4), 375-390. • Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign. • Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., &Aleven, V. (2019). Designing for complementarity: Teacher and student needs for orchestration support in AI-enhanced classrooms. In S. Isotani, E. Millán, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 157-171). Springer. • Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., &Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers & Education, 151, 103823. • Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491-525. • Kim, S., Jang, Y., Kim, W., Choi, S., Jung, H., Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2018). Why and what to teach: AI curriculum for elementary school. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 7758-7759). • Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. • Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press. • Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. • Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence (pp. 3-34). Basic Books. • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47. • Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. Teachers College Press. • Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2017). Informing progress: Insights on personalized learning implementation and effects. RAND Corporation. • Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49-64. • Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press. • Prajapati, M.A.B, Teaching Aptitude for Fostering 21st-Century Skills in NCFSE 2023 Classrooms (November 01, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5132472 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5132472 • Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press. • Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2016). AI as a methodology for supporting educational praxis and teacher metacognition. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 679-700. • Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2017). Ethics and learning analytics: Charting the (un)charted. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. F. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), The handbook of learning analytics (pp. 49-57). Society for Learning Analytics Research • Prajapati, M.A.B,(2024). Artificially Intelligent in Education: "Redefining Learning in the 21st Century". Artificially Intelligent in Education: "redefining Learning in the 21st Century", 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12818287 • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press. • Reich, J., & Mehta, J. D. (2020). Failure to disrupt: Why technology alone can't transform education. Harvard University Press. • Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2007). Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 249-255. • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. • Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer-based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1-19. • Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers' emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327-358. • Taxer, J. L., & Frenzel, A. C. (2015). Facets of teachers' emotional lives: A quantitative investigation of teachers' genuine, faked, and hidden emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 78-88. • VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. • Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Appraising research on personalized learning: Definitions, theoretical alignment, advancements, and future directions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 235-252. • Warschauer, M., &Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225. • Woolf, B. P. (2009). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann. • Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. • Zhao, Y. (2023). Technology and educational change: How much of the difference is a difference? Journal of Educational Change, 24(1), 143-164. • Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840.