Published June 18, 2025 | Version v1
Publication Open

DIGITAL SOCIETY: TOWARD THE PROBLEM OF PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University
  • 2. Державна наукова установа "Інститут інформації, безпеки і права Національної академії правових наук України"
  • 3. ROR icon Universidad de Playa Ancha de Ciencias de la Educación

Description

An attempt is made to conceptualize the phenomenon of the digital society. It is shown that the formation of a digital society is directly linked to the intensive development of new technologies that has taken place over the past few decades. The phenomenon of digitalization is analyzed as a result of informatization and computerization, and as the next stage in technological development. The digitalization of social reality is viewed as a combination of the processes of networking, datification, algorithmization, and platformization. The problem of communication in the digital society is examined against the backdrop of the mediatization of socio-cultural reality, and it is argued that the architectonics of the digital society is formed through digital processes of virtual communication.

Files

Данильян_Дзьобань_Ласнібат.pdf

Files (346.6 kB)

Additional details

Identifiers

Other
141:[316.32:004]

Related works

Is published in
2075-7190 (ISSN)

Dates

Issued
2025-06-18

References

  • Voronkova, V., Nikitenko, V. (2023). Problema transformatsii liudyny u konteksti transhumanizmu: metodolohiia tsyfrovoi antropolohii. Humanitaties studies, 16, 9–17 [in Ukrainian].
  • Beck, U. (2016). The Metamorphosis of the World: How Climate Change is Transforming Our Concept of the World. Cambridge, Malden: Polity.
  • Schwab, K., Malleret, T. (2020). COVID-19: The Great Reset. Geneva: Forum Publishing.
  • Livingstone, S. (2009). On the Mediation of Everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1–18.
  • Mar՚yenko, V. (2025). Ontolohiia informatsiino-komunikatsiinykh tekhnolohii yak chynnyk vplyvu na liudynu i suspilstvo: modusy tsyfrovoi hlobalizatsii. Humanitaties studies, 22, 68–80 [in Ukrainian].
  • Voronkova, V., Nikitenko, V., Metelenko, N. (2024). Prakseolohichni zasady vprovadzhennia kontseptsii tsyfrovoi liudyny ta tsyfrovoho suspilstva v konteksti hlobalnykh zmin. Humanitaties studies, 21, 22–31 [in Ukrainian].
  • Kovalenko, I., Meliakova, Y., Kalnytskyi, E., Nesterenko, K. (2023). Postpanopticon: Control and Media in the New Digital Reality. Filosofija, Sociologija, 34(3), P. 219– 227.
  • Khaustova, M. H. (2023). Vyhody, ryzyky ta problemy tsyfrovizatsii suspilstva: zahalnoteoretychnyi aspekt. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo ‒ Analytical and comparative jurisprudence, 5, 753–759 [in Ukrainian].
  • Khaustova, M. H. (2022). Derzhavna polityka v umovakh tsyfrovizatsii suspilstva. Mizhnarodnyi dosvid realizatsii prohram ta stratehii tsyfrovizatsii. Analitychnoporivnialne pravoznavstvo ‒ Analytical and comparative jurisprudence, 2, 209–216 [in Ukrainian].
  • Shcho take otsyfrovuvannia? https://experience.dropbox.com/uk-ua/resources/whatis- digitization [in Ukrainian].
  • Gray, J., Rumpe, B. (2025). Models for Digitalization. Software and Systems Modeling, 14(4), 1319–1320
  • Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. URL: https://www.amazon.com/Being-Digital- Nicholas-Negroponte/dp/0679762906?asin=0679762906&revisionId=&format=4&d epth=1
  • Buhaichuk, O. (2025). Sotsialno-filosofskyi analiz tsyfrovizatsii ekonomiky. Humanitaties studies, 22, 18–25 [in Ukrainian].
  • Kryshtanovych, M. F. (2025). Vazhlyvist intelektualizatsii yak protsesu dlia publichnoi sluzhby: vplyv tsyfrovizatsii ta hlobalizatsii. Suspilstvo ta natsionalni interesy ‒ Society and national interests, 1, 453–463 [in Ukrainian].
  • Hetmantseva, N. D. (2024). Modyfikatsiia trudovykh vidnosyn v umovakh tsyfrovizatsii. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo ‒ Analytical and comparative jurisprudence, 2, 309–313 [in Ukrainian].
  • Couldry, N., Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. URL: https:// download.e-bookshelf.de/download/0010/8804/28/L-G-0010880428–0026716188.pdf
  • Hepp, A. (2018). Deep Mediatization. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/338454784_Deep_Mediatization
  • Danylian, O. H., Dzoban, O. P. (2025). Doslidzhennia sotsialnykh komunikatsii: evrystychnyi potentsial modelei N. Lumana ta K. Shennona. Visnyk Natsionalnoho yurydychnoho universytetu imeni Yaroslava Mudroho. Seriia: filosofiia, filosofiia prava, politolohiia, sotsiolohiia ‒ Bulletin of the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. Series: philosophy, philosophy of law, political science, sociology, 1(64), 8–24 [in Ukrainian].
  • Vykhovanets, Z. S. (2024). Postneklasychni vizii vzaiemovplyvu sotsialnykh praktyk ta movnoho potentsialu: fenomen komunikatsii. Kulturolohichnyi almanakh ‒ Cultural almanac, 3, 199–205 [in Ukrainian].
  • Drotianko, L. H. (2024). Unikalnist liudskoho buttia u suchasnykh sotsialnykh komunikatsiiakh. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu. Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia ‒ Bulletin of the National Aviation University. Philosophy. Culturology, 1, 5–10 [in Ukrainian].