Published June 12, 2025 | Version v1

Hortiboletus Simonini, Vizzini & Gelardi

  • 1. Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW 9 3 DS, UK & Mycological Society of Israel, P. O. Box 164, Pardesiya 42815, Israel & Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Center of the Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Temesvári Blvd. 62, Szeged H- 6726, Hungary & Institute of Evolution and Department of Evolutionary & Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Aba Khoushi Ave. 199, Mt. Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel
  • 2. Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University, 125 Lenin Ave., Tula 300026, Russia
  • 3. The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB 15 8 QH, UK
  • 4. Via bell'aria 8, Reggio nell'Emilia I- 42121, Italy
  • 5. Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW 9 3 DS, UK & Via dei Barattoli 3 A, Anguillara Sabazia I- 00061, RM, Italy
  • 6. Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2 Prof. Popov Str., Saint Petersburg 197376, Russia
  • 7. Agricultural University of Athens, Laboratory of General and Agricultural Microbiology, Iera Odos 75, Athens 11855, Greece
  • 8. Sociedad Micológica Barakaldo, P. O. Box 100, 48902 Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain
  • 9. Hungarian Mycological Society, Pázmány Péter s. 1 / c, Budapest H- 1117, Hungary
  • 10. Via Di Anfuso pal. 28, n. 221, Messina I- 98147, Italy
  • 11. Institute of Evolution and Department of Evolutionary & Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Aba Khoushi Ave. 199, Mt. Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel & M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Tereshchenkivska St. 2, Kiev 01601, Ukraine
  • 12. Institute of Evolution and Department of Evolutionary & Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Aba Khoushi Ave. 199, Mt. Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel
  • 13. Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Viale P. A. Mattioli 25, Turin I- 10125, Italy
  • 14. Department of Plant Anatomy, Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1 / c, H- 1117, Budapest, Hungary

Description

Hortiboletus Simonini, Vizzini & Gelardi, in Vizzini, Index Fungorum 244: 1 (2015), emend. Biketova, Simonini, Gelardi & Vizzini

Emended description.

Basidiomes stipitate-pileate with tubular-poroid hymenophore, epigeal, xerocomoid, small or medium-sized. Pileus surface dry, matt, subtomentose to finely squamulose pileus, in some species, gradually cracking with age and becoming areolate-rimose along the margin or overall, exposing the pale or reddish context in the cracks, colours ranging from ochraceous, pinkish-red, scarlet red, vinaceous red, reddish-brown to brown, not showing a blue-green reaction with NH 3. Stipe fibrous, surface dry, pruinose or fibrillose, yellow to pinkish-red or brownish. Context whitish to light yellow, sometimes flesh pink or reddish-pink in the upper part of the pileus, pale to dull yellowish-brown in the stipe, usually bruising pale blue or, less frequently, deep blue in the pileus and the connection zone with the stipe; the stipe base context sometimes showing minute orange to orange-red dots. Taste mild. Spore print olive-brown. Pileipellis a palisadoderm or physalo-palisadoderm of more or less encrusted hyphae, or rarely a trichoderm. Basidiospores smooth, never striate nor truncate at apex, ellipsoid-fusiform, with an average spore quotient (Qm) lower than or up to 2.6. Hymenophoral trama bilateral divergent intermediate between the “ Boletus - type ” and the “ Phylloporus - type ”. Lateral stipe stratum absent or rarely present of the boletoid type. Fertile caulohymenium. Hymenophore tissue and basidiospores inamyloid or with a fleeting amyloid reaction; and negative amyloid reaction at stipe base according to Imler’s procedure. Basidiomes grow preferably in light, grassy forests, forest edges, meadows, and disturbed places, such as urban or rural areas.

The etymology of the generic name Hortiboletus derives from the Latin word hortus (garden) and refers to the growth of these boletes in gardens.

Generic type.

Boletus rubellus Krombh.

Notes.

According to the original description, the genus Hortiboletus is close to Xerocomellus, differing by the smooth basidiospores without any ornamentation (both under light microscopy and SEM, see Fig. 3), the average spore quotient (Qm) that is lower than or equal to 2.5 and the presence of tiny carrot-orange to orange-red dots in the context at the stipe base (Vizzini 2015). Nevertheless, recent studies show that not all representatives of the genus Hortiboletus share the aforementioned morphological features, based on which they were separated from Xerocomellus. For example, the average spore quotient of some collections of H. bubalinus and H. subpaludosus may be higher than 2.5 (Ladurner and Simonini 2003; Wu et al. 2016). In addition, Hortiboletus species do not have peculiar microchemical reactions (iodine, metachromatic, cyanophilic). Amyloid reaction of the stipe base trama is negative according to Imler’s procedure (Imler 1950).

Possible and fickle appearance of orange-red dots (“ ponctuation de Redeuilh ”; Simonini (1998)) in the context of the stipe base is a feature which discriminates European and Levantine members of the genus Hortiboletus from those of Xerocomellus and Rheubarbariboletus. However, it is probably a character shared by only a few species in this genus. For the majority of Asian and American Hortiboletus species, such as H. amygdalinus, H. arduinus, H. campestris, H. coccyginus, H. flavorubellus, H. napaeus, H. rubroreticulatus, H. rufosquamosus, H. rupicapreus, H. sinorubellus, H. subpaludosus, and H. tomentosus, no red dots are reported to occur in the stipe base (Thiers and Smith 1966; Smith and Thiers 1971; Wu et al. 2016; Frank et al. 2020; Xie et al. 2020; Lebeuf et al. 2021; Mao et al. 2023; Pham et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2024). Moreover, in many cases (especially in wet conditions), they are not observable even in H. rubellus, H. engelii, and H. hershenzoniae. In most specimens of H. hershenzoniae, they are visible only using a stereomicroscope. As already pointed out by Taylor and Eberhardt (2006) and Gelardi (2010), our present investigation shows that dispersed red dots may be rarely present in some collections of H. bubalinus.

Hortiboletus exsiccata, like those of Xerocomellus, gradually lose their bright colour becoming brownish upon drying; but red dots in the context of the stipe base, if present in fresh basidiomes, retain their bright colour for decades. In addition, the stipe base context in Rheubarbariboletus remains yellow-orange to orange. Probably there are similar pigments present in the stipe base of both genera, but further investigation will be necessary to confirm it.

Hortiboletus species have a palisadoderm or physalo-palisadoderm pileipellis, as is the case in the genus Xerocomellus, although H. arduinus, H. campestris, H. coccyginus, H. flavorubellus, and H. napaeus appear to display a trichoderm pileipellis (Thiers and Smith 1966; Smith and Thiers 1971; Frank et al. 2020; Xie et al. 2020). According to literature and our current observations, the hymenophoral trama of Hortiboletus species is intermediate between the “ Boletus - type ” and the “ Phylloporus - type ” and an intermediate structure is also typical of stipitate-pileate Xerocomellus species (Šutara 2008; Vizzini 2015). When compressed under a cover glass, the lateral strata separate easily, as in the “ Boletus - type ” trama (Singer 1965). In the descriptions of H. arduinus, H. napaeus, H. rufosquamosus, H. rupicapreus and H. tomentosus, the trama is reported to be of the boletoid type (Xie et al. 2020; Lebeuf et al. 2021; Mao et al. 2023). However, we assume that their trama is also intermediate, although the authors of these species likely did not recognise this transitional type.

Species of this genus develop ectomycorrhizal associations with plants of the families Betulaceae, Cistaceae, Corylaceae, Fagaceae, Malvaceae, Pinaceae, and Salicaceae, growing preferably in grassy forests, forest edges, meadows, riverbanks, and disturbed places in general, such as urban or rural areas (urban parks, public and private gardens, lawns, flowerbeds, ruderal places, pastureland, open heaths, abandoned agricultural fields, sport fields, parking lots, roadsides, clearings, drainage ditches, etc.) (Ladurner and Simonini 2003; Gelardi 2009; Das et al. 2016; Wu et al. 2016; Naseer et al. 2019; Frank et al. 2020; Lebeuf et al. 2021). Hortiboletus species are edible, but similarly to other xerocomoid boletes, not particularly palatable. Accordingly, they do not have economic importance and are rarely collected for consumption by mushroom hunters.

Maps of distribution of four target species (H. rubellus, H. bubalinus, H. engelii, and H. hershenzoniae), based on the current study and sequence data from public repositories and associated publications, are given below (Figs 4, 5).

Notes

Published as part of Biketova, Alona Yu., Svetasheva, Tatyana Yu., Taylor, Andy F. S., Simonini, Giampaolo, Gelardi, Matteo, Morozova, Olga V., Polemis, Elias, Muñoz, José A., Albert, László, Saitta, Salvatore, Wasser, Solomon P., Nevo, Eviatar, Zervakis, Georgios I., Vizzini, Alfredo & Dima, Bálint, 2025, Morphological and molecular re-assessment of European and Levantine species of the genus Hortiboletus (Boletaceae), pp. e 144731 in IMA Fungus 16 on page e144731, DOI: 10.3897/imafungus.16.144731

Files

Files (7.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f368a4ba6776e0efe44e669bc49d7637
7.9 kB Download

System files (47.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5315c9d9a500e9c8864149f8be7df7b3
47.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Simonini, Vizzini & Gelardi
Kingdom
Fungi
Phylum
Basidiomycota
Order
Boletales
Family
Boletaceae
Genus
Hortiboletus
Taxon rank
genus

References

  • Vizzini A (2015) Nomenclatural novelties. Index Fungorum 244: 1.
  • Ladurner H, Simonini G (2003) Xerocomus s. l. Fungi Europaei, vol 8. Edizioni Candusso, Alassio, 527 pp.
  • Wu G, Li YC (2016) One hundred noteworthy boletes from China. Fungal Diversity 81: 25–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0375-8
  • Imler L (1950) Recherches sur les bolets. Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 66 (4): 177–203.
  • Thiers HD, Smith AH (1966) An undescribed bolete in the B. rubellus group. Michigan Botanist 5: 117–118.
  • Smith AH, Thiers HD (1971) The Boletes of Michigan. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 438 pp.
  • Frank J, Siegel N (2020) Xerocomellus (Boletaceae) in western North America. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 6: 265–288. https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2020.06.13
  • Xie HJ, Lin WF (2020) Two new species of Hortiboletus (Boletaceae, Boletales) from China. Mycological Progress 19 (11): 1377–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01634-z
  • Lebeuf R, Alexandrova AV (2021) Fungal Systematics and Evolution: FUSE 8. Sydowia 74: 193–249.
  • Mao N, Zhao TY (2023) Boletaceae from Shanxi Province of northern China with descriptions of ten new species. Mycosphere 14 (1): 2013–2091. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/24
  • Pham THG, Popov E (2024) New data on Boletaceae (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) from central Vietnam with description of two new species and creation of a new combination based on morphological and phylogenetic evidence. Journal of Fungi 10: 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10030223
  • Wang Y, Ma YH (2024) Polyphasic taxonomy clarifies the relationships between Butyriboletus and Exsudoporus, and new taxa and reports of Boletaceae from China. Mycosphere 15 (1): 881–953. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/7
  • Taylor AFS, Eberhardt U (2006) The genus Xerocomus in Sweden. Svensk Mykologisk Tidskrift 27 (3): 35–48.
  • Gelardi M (2010) Additional data and iconography concerning Xerocomus bubalinus from central and northern Italy. Bollettino dell'Associazione Micologica ed Ecologica Romana 80–81 (2–3): 13–21.
  • Šutara J (2008) Xerocomus s. l. in the light of the present state of knowledge. Czech Mycology 60 (1): 29–62. https://doi.org/10.33585/cmy.60104
  • Singer R (1965) Die Röhrlinge Teil I. Die Boletaceae (ohne Boletoideae). Die Pilze Mitteleuropas Band V. Verlag Julius Klinkhardt, Bad Heilbrun, 131 pp.
  • Gelardi M (2009) First record of Xerocomus bubalinus in Italy and the generic placement of Xerocomus engelii comb. nov. Bollettino dell'Associazione Micologica ed Ecologica Romana 75–76 (3–1): 11–20.
  • Das K, Chakraborty D (2016) New species of xerocomoid boletes (Boletaceae) from Himalayan India based on morphological and molecular evidence. Mycologia 108 (4): 753–764. https://doi.org/10.3852/15-206
  • Naseer A, Sarwar S (2019) Hortiboletus kohistanensis: a new species from temperate and subalpine oak forests of Pakistan. Phytotaxa 388 (3): 239–246. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.388.3.3