ASX Aviation Research
Published June 17, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Balancing Automation and Human Expertise: A Comprehensive Approach to the Future of Air Safety

Authors/Creators

  • 1. ASX Research Journal and Database
  • 2. ROR icon Everglades University

Description

The future of air safety relies on a holistic approach that integrates advanced technologies, human factors, and comprehensive training programs. This paper examines the critical components of aviation safety, including the development of intelligible software, the importance of robust training, and the irreplaceable role of human intervention in complex and high-risk scenarios. Through the analysis of key incidents, such as the Boeing 737 MAX and Air France Flight 447, the study highlights the challenges and opportunities presented by automation and artificial intelligence (AI) in aviation. It emphasizes the need for a balanced approach where technology supports rather than replaces human expertise, underscoring the value of human judgment, adaptability, and decision-making under pressure. The findings suggest that by fostering a collaborative environment where humans and machines work together, the aviation industry can achieve enhanced safety and efficiency. This research calls for continued investment in both technological advancements and human-centered training strategies to create a more resilient and adaptable aviation safety framework.

Files

Balancing Automation2.pdf

Files (253.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d1691bae389d0d5c4df666b189a09f19
253.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Created
2025-06-17

References

  • Bennett, K. B., & Flach, J. M. (2011). Display and interface design: Subtle science, exact art (p. 220). CRC Press. Brooks, R. A. (2003). Flesh and machines: How robots will change us (p. 123). Vintage. Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses. (2012). Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France Flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro–Paris (p. 48). https://www.bea.aero/en/ Dekker, S. (2014). The field guide to understanding 'human error' (p. 45). Ashgate Publishing. Dekker, S. (2014). The field guide to understanding 'human error' (pp. 112–130). Ashgate Publishing. Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37(2), (pp. 381–394). Endsley, M. R., & Kaber, D. B. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness, and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42(3), (pp. 462–492). Endsley, M. R. (2015). Situation awareness and workload in aviation: Effects of automation on human performance. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 9(1), (pp. 60–75). Endsley, M. R. (2015). Final reflections: Situation awareness models and measures. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 9(1), (pp. 101–111). Fleming, E., & Pritchett, A. (2016). SRK as a framework for the development of training for effective interaction with multi-level automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 18(3), (pp. 511–528). BALANCING AUTOMATION AND HUMAN EXPERTISE: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO THE FUTURE OF AIR SAFETY 18 Hancock, P. A., & Parasuraman, R. (2017). Human factors in automation: Will history repeat itself? Ergonomics in Design, 25(1), (pp. 4–8). Harris, D., & Muir, H. (2005). Human performance on the flight deck (pp. 112–128). Ashgate Publishing. Kuchar, J. K., & Yang, L. C. (2000). A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1(4), (pp. 179–189). Maurino, D. (2017). Safety management systems in aviation (pp. 45–67). Ashgate Publishing. Miller, T., & Miller, R. (2017). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, (pp. 1–38). Orasanu, J., & Martin, L. (1998). Errors in aviation decision making: A factor in accidents and incidents. In Human error and safety (pp. 1–9). Academic Press. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), (pp. 230–253). Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), (pp. 286–297). Roza, D. (2020). Training in the age of virtual reality: Enhancing pilot performance through immersive learning. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 9(2), (pp. 30–40). Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Rhodenizer, L. (2010). It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 20(1), (pp. 1–8). Sánchez-Alarcos, J. (2020). Aviation and human factors: How to incorporate human factors into the field (pp. 124–129). CRC Press. BALANCING AUTOMATION AND HUMAN EXPERTISE: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO THE FUTURE OF AIR SAFETY 19 Sheridan, T. B. (2002). Humans and automation: System design and research issues (pp. 87– 102). Wiley-Interscience. Sullenberger, C. B. (2009). Highest duty: My search for what really matters (pp. 150–165). HarperCollins. Wickens, C. D. (2018). Automation in aviation: Prospects and pitfalls. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 32(5), (pp. 1–10).