Coating of microscope slide labels: a possible solution for their long-term preservation
Authors/Creators
- 1. State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany|University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany|Center of Excellence for Biodiversity and Integrative Taxonomy (KomBioTa), Stuttgart, Germany
- 2. State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany|Center of Excellence for Biodiversity and Integrative Taxonomy (KomBioTa), Stuttgart, Germany
- 3. State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Description
Microscope slide labels hold valuable scientific information within natural history collections, making their long-term preservation crucial. This study tests Paraloid B-72 as a potential protective coating, offering a quick and simple method to safeguard these labels against environmental influences such as humidity and light exposure. Various paper types and writing materials were tested with different concentrations of Paraloid B-72 dissolved in ethyl acetate. Our findings indicate that a 20% concentration provides optimal results, maintaining label readability and protection, while minimizing significant issues like bubble formation. Although a two-layer application of a 15% solution provides strong stabilization, it requires extended processing times. This approach presents a method to enhance label longevity, aligning with sustainable preservation practices. Nevertheless, careful application is crucial to prevent adhesion issues during drying, indicating a need for further refinement of the technique.
Files
NHCM_article_153194.pdf
Files
(2.7 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:7e138066c9c746acd45993aa585a0668
|
2.7 MB | Preview Download |
System files
(57.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:5f350c96788d729b8b383f246591ce08
|
57.7 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
References
- Andersson H (1976) A simple and inexpensive method of mounting an insect and its excised genitalia on the same pin. Insect Systematics & Evolution 7(2): 152–153. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631276X00234
- Arslanoglu J (2004) Aquazol as used in conservation practice. WAAC Newsletter 26: 10–15.
- Brown PA (1997) A review of techniques used in the preparation, curation and conservation of microscope slides at the Natural History Museum, London. The Biology Curator 10(Supplement): 1–4.
- Benham PM, Bowie RCK (2023) Natural history collections as a resource for conservation genomics: Understanding the past to preserve the future. Journal of Heredity 114(4): 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esac066
- Burns JM (1997) Presidential address 1996: on the beauties, uses, variation, and handling of genitalia. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 51: 1–8.
- Černič M, Dolenc J, Scheicher L (2006) Permanence and durability of digital prints on paper. Applied Physics A 83(4): 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-006-3543-y
- Chapman S, Mason D (2003) Literature review: the use of Paraloid B-72 as a surface consolidant for stained glass. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 42(2): 381–392. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180077
- Colombo WD, Tribull CM, Waichert C, Azevedo CO (2022) Integrative taxonomy solves taxonomic impasses: a case study from Epyrinae (Hymenoptera, Bethylidae). Systematic Entomology 47(3): 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12544
- Cristóvão JP, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2021) The terminalia of the superfamily Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera): specific glossary, dissecting methodology, techniques and previously unrecorded sexual dimorphism in some difficult groups. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 191(4): 1001–1043. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa079
- Donovan SK, Riley M (2013) The importance of labels to specimens: an example from the Sedgwick Museum. The Geological Curator 9(10): 509–514. https://doi.org/10.55468/GC51
- Funk VA (2018) Collections-based science in the 21st Century. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 56(3): 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12315
- Freidig AP, Verhaar HJM, Hermens JLM (1999) Quantitative structure‐property relationships for the chemical reactivity of acrylates and methacrylates. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18(6): 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620180609
- Gurney AB, Kramer JP, Steyskal GC (1964) Some techniques for the preparation, study, and storage in microvials of insect genitalia. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 57: 240–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/57.2.240
- Gütebier T (2011) Schadenserfassung, Pflegeplan, und Pflege von Mikropräparaten der Typensammlung des Göteborger Naturhistorischen Museums. Der Präparator 57: 67–86.
- Han Z, Huang X, Chen J, Chen J (2024) 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole compounded with the conventional sealer B72 for the protection of rusted bronze. Journal of Cultural Heritage 67: 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2024.01.010
- Ion RM, Grigorescu RM, David ME, Iancu L (2023) B72 vs. Paraloid B67 materials for conservation of wood artifacts. Scientific Bulletin of Valahia University – Materials and Mechanics 19(21): 33–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsmm-2023-0016
- Johnson KR, Owens IFP, The Global Collection Group (2023) A global approach for natural history museum collections. Science 379(6638): 1192–1194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf6434
- Kres LA, Lovell NC (1995) A comparison of consolidants for archaeological bone. Journal of Field Archaeology 22(4): 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346995791974134
- Martinelli AB, Waichert C, Barbosa DN, Fagundes V, Azevedo CO (2017) The use of Proteinase K to access genitalia morphology, vouchering and DNA extraction in Minute wasps. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 89(3): 1629–1633. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160825
- Neuhaus B, Schmid T, Riedel J (2017) Collection management and study of microscope slides: Storage, profiling, deterioration, restoration procedures, and general recommendations. Zootaxa 4322(1): 1–173. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4322.1.1
- Noguera JR (2023) Innovations in the use of Paraloid B-72® as a surface adhesive method for conservation of bones and fossils. Journal Of Anthropological and Archaeological Sciences 7(4): 952–960. https://doi.org/10.32474/JAAS.2023.07.000269
- O'Connor CJ, Burr E, Cooper C, Meyer HW (2024) Updating conservation techniques for paleontology collections associated with Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument. Parks Stewardship Forum 40(1): 217–41. [JSTOR, Accessed 19 May 2025] https://www.jstor.org/stable/48799374
- Robinson GS (1976) The preparation of slides of Lepidoptera genitalia with special reference to the Microlepidoptera. Entomologist's Gazette 27: 127–132.
- Schauff ME (1986) Collecting and preserving insects and mites: techniques and tools. Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA, Washington D.C., 68 pp.
- Smith CW (2003) Archaeological Conservation Using Polymers: Practical Applications for Organic Artifact Stabilization. College Station, Texas A&M University Press, 129 pp.
- Sturm CF (2006) Chapter 5. Archival and curatorial methods. In: Sturm CF, Pearce TA, Valdés A (Eds) The mollusks. A guide to their study, collection, and preservation. Universal Publishers, Boca Raton, 45–58.
- Sullivan B, Cumberland Jr DR (1993) Use of Acryloid B-72 lacquer for labeling museum objects. National Park Service Conserve O Gram 1: 1–4.
- Teygeler R (2018) Preserving paper: Recent advances. In: Feather J (Ed.) Managing Preservation for Libraries and Archives: Current Practice and Future Development. Burlington, Ashgate, 83–112. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315249919-5
- Valentine JM (1942) On the preparation and preservation of insects with particular reference to Coleoptera. Smithsonian Institution Miscellaneous Collections 103(6): 1–15.
- Vinçotte A, Beauvoit E, Boyard N, Guilminot E (2019) Effect of solvent on PARALOID ® B72 and B44 acrylic resins used as adhesives in conservation. Heritage Science 7: 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-019-0283-9
- Wen J, Ickert-Bond SM, Appelhans MS, Dorr LJ, Funk VA (2015) Collections-based systematics: Opportunities and outlook for 2050. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 53(6): 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12181
- Wheeler TA, Huber JT, Currie DC (2001) Label data standards for terrestrial arthropods. A Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods). Document Series 8: 1–19.
- Zala K, Pentcheff ND, Wetzer R (2005) Laser-printed labels in wet collections: Will they hold up? Collection Forum 19(1–2): 49–56.
- Ziegler J (2022) Testing Aquazol®. An evaluation of its suitability for the conservation of works on paper. Journal of Paper Conservation 23(2): 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/18680860.2022.2066388