Published May 16, 2025 | Version 1.01
Presentation Open

From Vision to Reality: AI at the Heart of University Digital Transformation

  • 1. ROR icon Universidad de Salamanca

Description

Keynote at the 2ème Edition du Colloque International Communication et Transformation Numérique: Enjeux, Dynamiques Pratiques Innovantes, held 15-17 May 2025 in Oujda and Berkane, Maroc.

The digital transformation of higher education has evolved from a technical aspiration into an institutional imperative. Catalysed by the COVID-19 pandemic, universities worldwide were forced into a rapid digital shift, revealing profound structural, pedagogical, and social vulnerabilities. While technology was essential to continuity, the most critical insight from this experience is that digital transformation is not just about tools or platforms—it is, fundamentally, about people, culture, and mindset.

This keynote explores how artificial intelligence (AI), and more specifically, generative AI (GenAI), has become both a catalyst and a challenge in the evolving landscape of higher education. The arrival of tools like ChatGPT and other GenAI models has created an inflection point between vision and reality. No longer confined to specialized research domains, AI has entered the everyday fabric of teaching, learning, and governance. It generates new possibilities for personalization, creativity, and operational efficiency, but also introduces complex ethical, social, and strategic dilemmas.

A central thesis of this keynote is that AI adoption must be governed by a values-driven, participatory, and strategic approach. Drawing on international frameworks, including the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, UNESCO recommendations, and the Safe AI in Education Manifesto, the presentation outlines how universities can move from fragmented experimentation to coherent AI governance. This involves aligning institutional strategies with legal and ethical standards, promoting human oversight, and ensuring transparency, inclusivity, and innovation.

The presentation also examines the perceptions, concerns, and aspirations of key university stakeholders (teachers, students, researchers, and decision-makers) in relation to AI. For teachers, GenAI offers support in creating content, diversifying assessments, and facilitating personalized learning. Yet it also raises concerns about authorship, evaluation integrity, and overdependence on technology. Students benefit from AI-enhanced creativity, productivity, and language support, but face risks related to superficial learning, equity, and ethical boundaries. Researchers gain efficiency through automation and synthetic data, but must contend with challenges around source reliability, academic honesty, and privacy. Meanwhile, university leadership is tasked with balancing innovation and competitiveness with accountability and sustainability.

To address these complexities, the keynote proposes a structured governance framework for AI in universities, built on four core principles:

  1. Legality: AI must comply with existing regulations such as the GDPR and the EU AI Act.
  2. Neutrality: Systems must be designed to mitigate algorithmic and data biases.
  3. Transparency: All processes involving AI should be explainable and open to scrutiny.
  4. Innovation: Responsible experimentation must be encouraged to foster institutional growth.

These principles translate into practical governance structures, including the creation or reinforcement of:

  • An AI Commission for strategic direction and institutional coordination.
  • An Ethics Committee to oversee fairness and human dignity in AI use.
  • A Data Protection Officer with AI-specific responsibilities.
  • A Technical Services Unit to ensure operational alignment.
  • An Expert Advisory Group with interdisciplinary insight to assess evolving challenges.

This ecosystemic approach enables universities to integrate AI into their digital transformation strategies while protecting their academic mission and institutional integrity.

Finally, the keynote emphasizes that universities must not merely react to AI but lead its ethical integration and pedagogical reimagination. The goal is not to build AI-powered systems, but to cultivate an AI-augmented academic culture, a culture in which critical thinking, collaboration, and human-centred innovation remain at the core of educational practice.

In conclusion, this keynote is a call to action for universities to move from vision to reality by embracing AI not only as a technological opportunity but as a profound responsibility. By investing in governance structures, training programs, and ethical foresight, universities can position themselves as stewards of the digital era, ensuring that the rise of AI strengthens, rather than disrupts, the foundational values of education.

| Let us not just use AI, let us teach it, question it, and lead through it.

Files

20250516 - Marruecos.pdf

Files (6.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6034eb47bd4c9ae5bc7c96dbcdf54c74
6.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • [1] W. Van Lancker and Z. Parolin, "COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: a social crisis in the making," The Lancet Public Health, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. e243-e244, 2020. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0.
  • [2] E. Beaunoyer, S. Dupéré and M. J. Guitton, "COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 111, art. 106424, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424.
  • [3] M. Drouin, B. T. McDaniel, J. Pater and T. Toscos, "How Parents and Their Children Used Social Media and Technology at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associations with Anxiety," Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 727-736, 2020. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0284.
  • [4] F. J. García-Peñalvo, A. Corell, R. Rivero-Ortega, M. J. Rodríguez-Conde and N. Rodríguez-García, "Impact of the COVID-19 on Higher Education: An Experience-Based Approach," in Information Technology Trends for a Global and Interdisciplinary Research Community, F. J. García-Peñalvo, Ed. Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology (AHSAT) Book Series, pp. 1-18, Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global, 2021. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-4156-2.ch001.
  • [5] F. J. García-Peñalvo, A. Corell, V. Abella-García and M. Grande-de-Prado, "Recommendations for Mandatory Online Assessment in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic," in Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context. COVID-19 as an Opportunity for Global Learning, D. Burgos, A. Tlili and A. Tabacco, Eds. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, pp. 85-98, Singapore, Singapore: Springer Nature, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_6.
  • [6] A. Rodríguez de las Heras, "Con las smart cities estamos ante una revolución cultural," A. Pérez, Cuatroochenta, 2020. https://bit.ly/2PYU8Yu.
  • [7] S. Grajek and B. Reinitz. (2019, July 8) Getting Ready for Digital Transformation: Change Your Culture, Workforce, and Technology. Educase Review. Available from: https://bit.ly/2TrIurJ.
  • [8] A. C. Clarke, Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry into the Limits of the Possible, 2nd ed. New York, USA: Harper & Row, 1973.
  • [9] M. Alier-Forment and F. Llorens-Largo, "Cabalga el Cometa," in EP-31 Las Alucinaciones de ChatGPT con Faraón Llorens. España, 2023.
  • [10] F. J. García-Peñalvo and A. Vázquez-Ingelmo, "What do we mean by GenAI? A systematic mapping of the evolution, trends, and techniques involved in Generative AI," International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 7-16, 2023. doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2023.07.006.
  • [11] D. Burgos, "Inteligencia artificial y humanismo: construyendo un futuro centrado en el ser humano," Nueva Revista, no. 192, pp. 170-185, 2024.
  • [12] D. Fonseca-Escudero, F. J. García-Peñalvo, F. Llorens-Largo and R. Molina-Carmona, "¡Qué viene la IA! ¿Estoy preparada/o?," presented in VII Congreso Internacional sobre Innovación, Aprendizaje y Cooperación, CINAIC 2023, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, España, 18-20 de octubre de 2023, 2023. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10050857.
  • [13] E. Mozorov, To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs, 2013.
  • [14] Tyton Partners, "Time for class 2024. Unlocking access to effective digital teaching & learning," Tyton Partners June 11 2024. Available from: https://d66z.short.gy/XF3vb3.
  • [15] M. Alier, F. J. García-Peñalvo, M. J. Casañ, J. A. Pereira and F. Llorens-Largo, "Safe AI in Education Manifesto. Version 0.4.0," October 8 2024. Available from: https://manifesto.safeaieducation.org.
  • [16] F. J. García-Peñalvo, M. Alier, J. Pereira and M. J. Casañ, "Safe, Transparent, and Ethical Artificial Intelligence: Keys to Quality Sustainable Education (SDG4)," IJERI – International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, no. 22, pp. 1-21, 2024. doi: 10.46661/ijeri.11036.
  • [17] F. J. García-Peñalvo, F. Llorens-Largo and J. Vidal, "The new reality of education in the face of advances in generative artificial intelligence," RIED: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 9–39, 2024. doi: 10.5944/ried.27.1.37716.
  • [18] F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Generative Artificial Intelligence and Education: An Analysis from Multiple Perspectives," Education in the Knowledge Society, vol. 25, art. e31942, 2024. doi: 10.14201/eks.31942.
  • [19] Gobierno de España, "ENIA: Estrategia Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial," Madrid, España, 2020. Available from: https://bit.ly/3oHHUb0.
  • [20] Gobierno de España, "España Digital 2026. Informe sobre los avances en la Estrategia Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial," Gobierno de España, España, 2023. Available from: https://d66z.short.gy/ig0wxX.
  • [21] T. Madiega, "Artificial intelligence act," in "Briefing. EU Legislation in progress," European Parliament PE 698.792, 2024. Available from: https://d66z.short.gy/RgQoY8.
  • [22] European Parliament. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act. P9_TA(2024)0138: European Parliament. Available from: https://d66z.short.gy/2fRVtE.
  • [23] A. Bellogín, O. Grau, S. Larsson, G. Schimpf, B. Sengupta and G. Solmaz, "The EU AI Act and the Wager on Trustworthy AI," Communications of the ACM, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 58–65, 2024. doi: 10.1145/3665322.
  • [24] European Commission, "Living guidelines on the responsible use of generative AI in research," European Commission 2024. Available from: https://d66z.short.gy/MoSQTo.
  • [25] UNESCO, "Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence," UNESCO, Paris, France, 2022. Available from: https://bit.ly/40MCNna.
  • [26] E. Sabzalieva and A. Valentini, "ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide," UNESCO and UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean (IESALC), Paris, France; Caracas, Venezuela, ED/HE/IESALC/IP/2023/12, 2023. Available from: https://bit.ly/3oeYm2f.
  • [27] R. Molina-Carmona and F. J. García-Peñalvo, "Safeguarding Knowledge: Ethical Artificial Intelligence Governance in the University Digital Transformation," in Advanced Technologies and the University of the Future, E. Vendrell Vidal, U. R. Cukierman and M. E. Auer, Eds. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, no. 1140, pp. 201-220, Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-71530-3_14.
  • [28] ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 38500:2024. Information technology — Governance of IT for the organization, 3rd ed. 2024.
  • [29] F. Llorens-Largo and F. J. García-Peñalvo. (2023). La inteligencia artificial en el gobierno universitario. In: Universídad. Available from: https://bit.ly/46SSxbG.