The role of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in post-stroke motor recovery: synergies with antihypertensive therapy
Authors/Creators
- 1. assistant of the department of clinical laboratory diagnostics with the course of Clinical laboratory diagnostics of the faculty of postgraduate education.
- 2. Doctor of Philosophy in Medical Sciences (PhD), Assistant Professor, Department of Pathological Physiology, Samarkand State Medical University, Uzbekistan
- 3. DSc, associate professor of the department of Children Diseases, Pediatrics. Tashkent Medical Academy,
- 4. DSc, associate professor of the Department of Faculty and Hospital Surgery. Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sino. Bukhara, Uzbekistan
- 5. assistance of the Department of Faculty and Hospital Therapy of the Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sino. Bukhara, Uzbekistan
- 6. PhD, Senior teacher of the Department of Hygiene No.2 of the Bukhara State Medical Institute Named After Abu Ali Ibn Sino. Uzbekistan
- 7. Head of the Department of Pediatrics, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Fergana Medical Institute of Public Health, Republic of Uzbekistan. Ferghana.
Description
Stroke is one of the leading causes of motor disability worldwide, further emphasizing the need for novel strategies in rehabilitation. In this research, the authors investigate the role of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in the recovery of motor function following stroke and coordination with antihypertensive therapy in an integrated system. The present study will be a randomized clinical trial in the selected hospitals of Uzbekistan and will examine the additive effect of NIBS techniques (i.e., TMS and tDCS) and antihypertensive treatment on improving motor function, neuroplasticity, and blood pressure control. The major hypothesis is that using both these two strategies in combination will markedly increase the effectiveness of rehabilitation through increasing the neuronal mechanisms and cerebral blood flow. This research will use clinical assessment, electrophysiological observation, and neuroimaging to gather the data and analyze it with the help of sophisticated statistical analysis. The results of this study should provide a complete system of individualized post-stroke rehabilitation protocols in different groups, especially the Central Asian population.
Files
7 The role of non-invasive brain stimulation.pdf
Files
(397.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:ab931d2b6c262a403c0bd3758954e55e
|
397.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Feigin VL, Krishnamurthi RV, Barker-Collo S, et al. Global burden of stroke and risk factors: a systematic analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(10):795-820.
- 2. O'Donnell MJ, Chin SL, Rangarajan S, et al. Hypertension and stroke risk: a multinational case-control study. Lancet. 2016;388(10046):761-75.
- 3. Abdulmajeed, R. K., & Abed, N. The Cognitive Relevance in Understanding Coronavirus Posters. Rigeo, 2021; 11(12), 1699-1706, 10.48047/rigeo.11.12.154.
- 4. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation: challenges and opportunities. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693-702.
- 5. Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(2):474-528.
- 6. Nudo RJ. Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. NeuroRx. 2006;3(4):466-75.
- 7. Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1035.
- 8. Abed, I. N., & Abdulmajeed, R. K. The Rhetorical Perspective of Discursive and Non-discursive Contents of Selected British Election Songs. Rigeo, 2021; 11(9), 415-433. Doi:10.48047/rigeo.11.09.35
- 9. Loubinoux I, Kronenberg G, Endres M, Neuroprotective effects of antihypertensive agents in experimental stroke. Neuroimage. 2012;61(4):740-9.
- 10. Wardlaw JM, Smith C, Dichgans M. Small vessel disease: mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(2):113-24.
- 11. Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, et al. Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(11):975-85.
- 12. Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(11):609-24.
- 13. Immink MA, Hillier S, Wright J. Blood pressure variability and neuroplasticity post-stroke. J Hypertens. 2021;39(5):893-901.
- 14. Hsu WY, Cheng CH, Lin MW, et al. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in motor recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis. Neurology. 2023;100(5):e523-e532.
- 15. Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology—perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007;3(7):383-93.
- 16. Elsner B, Kwakkel G, Kugler J, Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving capacity in activities and arm function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;7:CD010435.
- 17. Guan W, Somanath PR, Kozak A, RAS inhibitors in stroke recovery: a focus on neuroplasticity. J Neurosci Res. 2022;100(1):98-111.
- 18. Ovbiagele B, Diener HC, Yusuf S, et al. Intensive blood pressure lowering in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(12):1155-65.
- 19. Ji R, Shen H, Pan Y, Ethnic differences in blood pressure management post-stroke: a multicenter study in Asia. Stroke. 2022;53(8):2506-14.
- 20. Kim DY, Lee Y, Park HW, Combined effects of tDCS and losartan on upper limb motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2022;99(10):e1023-e1032.
- 21. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(12):1844-8.
- 22. Khodjaev YU, Karimov KS, Rakhmatullaev AR. Genetic polymorphisms of ACE in Uzbek stroke patients. Cent Asian J Med Sci. 2021;7(2):45-52.
- 23. Liu L, Wang Z, Gong L, et al. Ethnic differences in response to antihypertensive therapy. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020;22(10):1-8.
- 24. Ahmedov SS, Rahimov FK. Stroke rehabilitation research in Central Asia: a scoping review. J Neurol Sci. 2023;445:120550