Published May 6, 2025 | Version v1

The Synergy of Digital Literacy and Communicative Competence in English Language Education

  • 1. Master's degree student Uzbek State World Languages University

Description

This study examines the relationship between digital literacy and communicative competence in English among 25 Uzbek undergraduate EFL learners, using a correlational research design. Digital literacy, including the ability to use digital tools for communication and information processing, was evaluated through practical tasks and self-assessment surveys. Communicative competence was assessed through role-play, group discussions, and writing tasks. The results revealed a strong and statistically significant positive correlation (r=0.957r = 0.957r=0.957, p<.001p < .001p<.001), showing that participants with higher digital literacy showed greater communicative competence. These findings highlight the synergistic relationship between digital literacy and language proficiency, emphasizing the importance of integrating digital literacy into English language classes. The study also  emphasizes on the potential of integrating digital tools to combine language learning in real-world contexts, contributing to the development of technology-integrated pedagogical strategies. 

Files

79-85.pdf

Files (668.0 kB)

Name Size
md5:df4b6912a6421d9eb5088cb8cca558dc
668.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2013). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course (3rd ed.). Heinle ELT.
  • 1. Crawford, W., & Smith, A. (2013). Rethinking the English tense/aspect system: A theoretical perspective. Language Teaching Research, 17(2), 179–200.
  • 2. Dudeney, G., Hockly, N., & Pegrum, M. (2013). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. Routledge.
  • 3. Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Using digital tools to support language learning in the classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 1–17.
  • 4. Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 329–342.