Private Complaints in BNSS: Empowering Citizens or Overloading Courts?
Authors/Creators
- 1. Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur
- 2. Right Recruitment, Birmingham
Description
A private complaint grants the victim the right to directly approach the judicial authority when police officials fail to fulfill their responsibilities regarding the victim's complaint. Under the new Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) this right seems to be shifted toward the accused, in contrast to the previous Code of Criminal Procedure, which was oriented towards the victim. The introduction of modifications, including a pre-cognizance hearing for the accused, justification by the police officer for the non-registration of a first information report, and the report from a superior authority in response to a complaint lodged against a public servant, directly impacts the principle of natural justice. This short note reveals the true essence of the provision concerning private complaints, while also emphasizing the modifications implemented under the BNSS. It also emphasizes various judicial decisions, underscoring the significance of the concept and the obligatory nature of requirements stipulated by the BNSS. The note emphasizes the potential ambiguity within the provisions and the complications it may engender. It concludes with the importance of the concept and the implications of the introduced changes on the nation's criminal justice system.
Files
1.Animesh Pareek 1-10.pdf
Files
(580.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:6ca7209478a39a352b19903018885bab
|
580.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
- Development Status
- Active
References
- * Research Fellow and Ph.D Scholar, Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur, West Bengal. ** Consultant, Right Recruitment, Birmingham, United Kingdom. [1]Lalitha Kumari v State of UP & Ors [1994] 4 SCC 260. [2]Sindhu Janak Nagargoje v State of Maharashtra[2023] SCC OnLine SC 631. [3]M. Sethi, 'Private Complaint: A Remedy' [2022] 4 Indian JL & Legal Rsch 1. [4]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 173(4), see alsoRatanlal and Dhirajlal, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (23rdedn, Lexis Nexis 2023) 523. [5]N. ShanthiMadhuresanv Inspector of Police[2017] SCC OnLine Mad 28782. [6]Jafar Ali Patel vs. The State and Ors.[2019] MANU/KA/0763/2019. [7]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 173 (1). [8]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 173(4). [9]The Code of Criminal Procedure, s154(3), see also Surendra Malikand SudeepMalik, Supreme Court on Criminal Procedure Code & Criminal Trial (2ndedn, Eastern Book Company 2015) 504. [10]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 173(4). [11]Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(23rdedn, Lexis Nexis 2023) 523. [12]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 210(2). [13]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 210(1)(a). [14]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 210(1)(b). [15]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 210(1)(c). [16]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 175(3). [17] D.N Sen, The Code of Criminal Procedure (1stedn, Premier Publishing Company 2004) 751. [18]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 Ch 16. [19]Sheik Meeran Saib v Ratnavelu Reddy AIR [1915] Mad 128. [20]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 223(1). [21]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 223(1)(a). [22] Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 223(1)(b). [23]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 223(1) Proviso. [24]Basanagouda R. Patil v Shivananda S. Patil[2024] SCC OnLine Kar 96. [25] Srikanth Chintala, 'Police will not register FIRs and magistrates cannot: Welcome to the regime of new criminal laws', (Bar & Bench, 3 Aug 2024)<https://www.barandbench.com/columns/police-wont-register-firs-magistrates-cannot-regime-of-new-criminal-laws> accessed 20 December 2024. [26]KV Singhand Madhavi Dutta, 'Allowing the accused to put their case' (2024) Indian Business LawJournal<https://law.asia/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita/> accessed 12 January 2025. [27] See Archita Garg, 'The New Criminal Laws: Just a Break from the Colonial Past or a Vision for a Citizen-Friendly Future?'(2023) 4 Jus Corpus LJ 379. [28]The Constitution of India 1950, Art 20(3). [29]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 223(2). [30]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 224. [31]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 225. [32]Minu Kumari v State of Bihar II [2006] CCR 137 (SC). [33]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 226. [34]State of Orissa v Debendra Nath Padhi [2005] 1 SCC 568. [35]AlequePadamsee And Ors v Union Of India[2007] 6 SCC 171. [36]Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, s 223(2). [37] KV Singh and Madhavi Dutta, 'Allowing the accused to put their case' (Indian Business Law Journal, 24 Dec 2024)<https://law.asia/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita/> accessed 12 January 2025. [38]Bharat Chugh, 'Opportunity to the (Proposed) Accused before taking cognizance on a complaint A Curious New Provision in the BNSS ' (The Blog of Bharat Chugh, 9 July 2024) <https://bharatchugh.in/2024/07/09/opportunity-to-the-proposed-accused-before-taking-cognizance-on-a-complaint-a-curious-new-provision-in-the-bnss/> accessed 15 October 2024. [39]Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 197. (Now s. 218 Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita). [40]Anil Kumar v M.K. Aiyappa[2013] 10 SCC 705. [41]Manju Surana v Sunil Arora & Ors[2018] 5 SCC 557.