Stakeholder Perceptions of Blockchain Transparency in the Agri-Food Supply Chain
Authors/Creators
Contributors
Researcher:
Description
Abstract
This study explores the role of blockchain transparency in the agri-food supply chain (FSC) by analyzing stakeholder perceptions of its benefits and barriers. While blockchain technology has been promoted as a solution for traceability, accountability, and consumer trust in the FSC, its broader adoption has remained limited. The research investigates this gap by focusing on transparency — a defining yet controversial feature of blockchain — and how it is perceived by key actors within the supply chain.
The research was conducted with the resources from the EU-funded TRUSTyFOOD project and employed a qualitative, four-phase thematic analysis based on data from five multi-stakeholder workshops. This paper focuses on two foundational stakeholder groups: farmers and agro-food companies. Key findings reveal that while blockchain transparency is associated with benefits such as improved consumer trust, storytelling, food fraud prevention, and equitable value distribution, it also presents barriers. These include data privacy concerns, competitive disadvantage, technological immaturity, and skepticism regarding the authenticity of on-chain data.
Importantly, the study identifies a disconnect between stakeholder understanding of blockchain capabilities and the nuances of different blockchain configurations (e.g., public vs. private). The research highlights the need for educational initiatives, standardized protocols, and regulatory frameworks to address stakeholder hesitancy and support successful implementation. By centering stakeholder voices, this research offers nuanced insights into the transparency–privacy trade-off, ultimately informing future blockchain adoption strategies within the agri-food sector.
Files
Stakeholder Perceptions of Blockchain Transparency in the Agri-Food Supply Chain V Sitnova.pdf
Files
(381.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:05a9008407bf3a2b5d3fa102c32d5fd8
|
381.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Additional titles
- Alternative title
- What do stakeholders perceive as the benefits and drawbacks associated with transparency in the implementation of blockchain technology within the agri-food supply chain?
Related works
- Is reviewed by
- https://www.trustyfood.eu/ (URL)
Dates
- Created
-
2024-05-28
References
- Behnke, K., & Janssen,. (2020). Boundary conditions for traceability in food supply chains using blockchain technology. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.025
- Bischoff, O., & Seuring, S. (2021). Opportunities and limitations of public blockchain-based supply chain traceability. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSCRA-07-2021-0014
- CNS Media. (2018, November 28). Globalized blockchain: Auchan implements food traceability technology on international scale. Foodingredientsfirst. https://www.foodingredientsfirst.com/news/globalized-blockchain-auchan-implements-food-traceability-technology-on-international-scale.html
- Cook, B. (2018). Blockchain: Transforming the seafood supply chain. In WWF. https://wwf.org.nz/sites/default/files/2023-06/wwf_blockchain_report_1_4_1.pdf
- De. (2020, September). Mirror, mirror on the wall who's the fairest of them all: The case for public blockchains. https://blogs.worldbank.org/voices/mirror-mirror-wall-whos-fairest-them-all-case-public-blockchains
- Dwivedi, Y. K., Balakrishnan, J., Das, R., & Dutot, V. (2023). Resistance to innovation: A dynamic capability model based enquiry into retailers' resistance to blockchain adaptation. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113632
- Ellahi, R. M., Wood, L. C., & Bekhit, A. E.-D. A. (2023). Blockchain-Based frameworks for food traceability: A systematic review. Foods, 12(16), 3026. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163026
- Flyverbom, M. (2016). Digital age transparency: Mediation and the management of visibilities. International Journal of Communication, 10(0), 13. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4490/1531
- Frizzo-Barker, J., Chow-White, P. A., Adams, P. R., Mentanko, J., Ha, D., & Green, S. (2020). Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: A systematic review. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.10.014
- Hyperledger. (2019). Case study: How Walmart brought unprecedented transparency to the food supply chain with Hyperledger Fabric. https://www.hyperledger.org/case-studies/walmart-case-study
- IBM. (2018). IBM Food Trust. Www.ibm.com. https://www.ibm.com/products/supply-chain-intelligence-suite/food-trust
- Kshetri, N. (2019). Blockchain and the economics of food safety. IT Professional, 21(3), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2019.2906761
- Nestlé. (2019, July 2). Nestlé breaks new ground with open blockchain pilot. Nestlé Global. https://www.nestle.com/media/pressreleases/allpressreleases/nestle-open-blockchain-pilot
- Pandey, V., Pant, M., & Snasel, V. (2022). Blockchain technology in food supply chains: Review and bibliometric analysis. Technology in Society, 69, 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101954
- Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2016). Organizational Transparency: A New Perspective on Managing Trust in Organization-Stakeholder Relationships. Journal of Management, 42, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202
- Scott Ruoti, Ben Kaiser, Arkady Yerukhimovich, Jeremy Clark, and Robert Cunningham. 2019. Blockchain technology: What is it good for? In ACM Queue, Vol. 17, No. 5, pages 60–87. ACM.
- Thompson, B. S., & Rust, S. (2023). Blocking blockchain: Examining the social, cultural, and institutional factors causing innovation resistance to digital technology in seafood supply chains. Technology in Society, 73, 102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102235
- TRUSTyFOOD. (2022, December). About - TRUSTyFOOD. https://www.trustyfood.eu/about/,%20https://www.trustyfood.eu/about/
- Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6, 5. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100
- Vergragt, P., & Quist, J. (2011). Backcasting for sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change - TECHNOL FORECAST SOC CHANGE, 78, 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010
- Vu, N., Ghadge, A., & Bourlakis, M. (2023). Blockchain adoption in food supply chains: a review and implementation framework. Production Planning & Control, 34, 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1939902
- Zhang, Z., Ren, D., Lan, Y., & Yang, S. (2021). Price competition and blockchain adoption in retailing markets. European Journal of Operational Research, 300(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.08.027
- Zhao, G., Liu, S., Lopez, C., Lu, H., Elgueta, S., Chen, H., & Boshkoska, B. M. (2019). Blockchain technology in agri-food value chain management: A synthesis of applications, challenges and future research directions. Computers in Industry, 109, 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.002