Published April 8, 2025 | Version v2
Peer review Open

Quantum Compression Theory: A Unified Framework for Emergent Gravity, Dark Sector and Matter Hierarchy

Authors/Creators

Description

Quantum Compression Theory (QCT) presents a novel theoretical framework that unifies quantum field theory, the Standard Model of particle physics, String Theory’s K3 varieties, and quantum gravity into a cohesive Theory of Everything (ToE). By leveraging geometrical quantization on Kähler manifolds, QCT introduces the concept of quantum compressibility, where fundamental particles emerge as compressed quantum states defined by topological quantum numbers and Berry phases. This approach yields precise predictions, including the W/Z boson mass ratio (0.8816 ± 0.0001, aligning with the experimental value of 0.8815 ± 0.0011) and the sum of neutrino masses (0.058 ± 0.004 eV). QCT reinterprets dark energy as a manifestation of entanglement density dynamics (with equation of state parameters w₀ = -1.027 ± 0.005 and wₐ = 0.032 ± 0.006) and proposes dark matter as topological defects (entangletons) formed during early universe phase transitions. The theory resolves the hierarchy problem and singularities through an entanglement-based emergent gravity mechanism, avoiding additional dimensions or supersymmetry. Supported by extensive simulations and validated across particle physics, cosmology, and material dynamics, QCT offers testable predictions for experiments like HL-LHC, DUNE, Euclid, and triboelectric permittivity studies.

Abstract

I present Quantum Compression Theory (QCT) as a candidate theory of quantum gravity based on quantum correlations in neutrino fields. The theory introduces a novel concept of entanglement density that modifies gravitational interactions and naturally leads to UV finiteness in quantum gravity. In this article, we systematically build the mathematical apparatus of QCT, starting with its geometric formulation on a Kähler manifold K$_3$, through proofs of UV finiteness and unitarity, to renormalization group analysis, BRST quantization, and generalization to curved backgrounds. We show that QCT provides solutions to several fundamental problems: non-renormalizability of quantum gravity, the cosmological constant problem, and gravitational singularities. The theory predicts measurable effects in particle physics, including specific corrections to the W/Z boson mass ratio and explanation of neutrino anomalies. In the cosmological context, QCT offers a dynamic explanation of dark energy with parameters $\Omega_\Lambda = \frac{7}{13}\alpha^{-3} \approx 0.685$ and $\Omega_c = \frac{5}{13}\alpha^{-2} \approx 0.265$, which are in remarkable agreement with measurements. We also present testable predictions for future experiments in particle physics, gravitational-wave astronomy, and cosmology.

Files

AAS.pdf

Files (1.9 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7f6d4a2428ad3b0c115ba7abb83b346b
454.7 kB Preview Download
md5:6a6e2e30192b1bd4d9fe3b1514b18d4f
1.4 MB Preview Download
md5:dd464de70361adde0fcf29f0a59989a5
105.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is continued by
10.5281/zenodo.15049135 (DOI)

Dates

Available
2025-03-31
Updated
2025-04-08

References

  • Plhák, B. (2025). Functional Renormalization Analysis of Quantum Compression Theory: From Neutrino Fields to Emergent Gravity (QCT). Zenodo.
  • 1. Berry, M. V. (1984). Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 392(1802), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1984.0023 2. Esteban, I., et al. (2020). Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2020(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2020)106 3. Particle Data Group. (2020). Review of particle physics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2020(8), 083C01. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptaa104 4. Penrose, R. (2004). The road to reality: A complete guide to the laws of the universe. Vintage Books. 5. Planck Collaboration. (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 6. Polchinski, J. (1998). String theory (Vols. 1–2). Cambridge University Press. 7. Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999). Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension. Physical Review Letters, 83(17), 3370–3373. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370 8. Reuter, M., & Saueressig, F. (2012). Quantum Einstein gravity. New Journal of Physics, 14(5), 055022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055022 9. Riess, A. G., et al. (2019). Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid standards provide a 1% foundation for the determination of the Hubble constant. The Astrophysical Journal, 876(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0cbf 10. Rovelli, C. (2004). Quantum gravity. Cambridge University Press. 11. Sorkin, R. D. (2005). Causal sets: Discrete gravity. In D. Oriti (Ed.), Lectures on quantum gravity (pp. 305–327). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11375470_16 12. Weinberg, S. (2009). Effective field theory, past and future. PoS, CD09, 001. https://doi.org/10.22323/1.066.0001 13. Wess, J., & Bagger, J. (1992). Supersymmetry and supergravity (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. 14. Wang, Z. L. (2012). Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology for self-powered systems and as active mechanical and chemical sensors. ACS Nano, 7(11), 9533–9557. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn305102z 15. Fan, F. R., Tian, Z. Q., & Wang, Z. L. (2012). Flexible triboelectric generator. Nano Energy, 1(2), 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.01.004 16. Chen, J., & Wang, Z. L. (2018). Reviving vibration energy harvesting and self-powered sensing by a triboelectric nanogenerator. Joule, 2(8), 1559–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.011 17. Liu, J., et al. (2019). Direct-current triboelectricity generation by a sliding Schottky nanocontact on MoS₂ multilayers. Nature Nanotechnology, 14(6), 590–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0431-2 18. Wang, S., et al. (2014). Maximum surface charge density for triboelectric nanogenerators achieved by ionized-air injection: Methodology and theoretical understanding. Advanced Materials, 26(39), 6720–6728. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201402061 19. Baytekin, H. T., et al. (2011). The mosaic of surface charge in contact electrification. Science, 333(6040), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201512 20. Xu, C., et al. (2018). On the electron-transfer mechanism in the contact-electrification effect. Advanced Materials, 30(15), 1706790. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706790 21. Zou, H., et al. (2020). Quantifying the triboelectric series. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17559-0 22. McCarty, L. S., & Whitesides, G. M. (2008). Electrostatic charging due to separation of ions at interfaces: Contact electrification of ionic electrets. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 47(12), 2188–2207. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200701722 23. Zhang, X. S., et al. (2015). Frequency-multiplication high-output triboelectric nanogenerator for sustainably powering biomedical microsystems. Nano Letters, 15(1), 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl504364s