Quantum Computing: Redefining Computational Limits for the Next Era
Authors/Creators
Description
Quantum computing is poised to revolutionize the world of computation by har
nessing the principles of quantum mechanics to solve problems that are beyond the capabilities
of classical computers. Unlike traditional binary computing, which relies on bits that exist as 0s
or 1s, quantum computing operates using qubits, which leverage superposition, entanglement,
and quantum parallelism to perform computations exponentially faster. This transformative
technology has applications in cryptography, artificial intelligence, materials science, and
complex system simulations, offering unprecedented computational power.
Despite its potential, quantum computing faces significant challenges, including hard
ware stability, quantum decoherence, and error correction. Current quantum processors, such
as those developed by IBM, Google, and D-Wave, have demonstrated quantum supremacy in
specific tasks, but scaling quantum computers to practical levels remains a major hurdle. Ad
ditionally, algorithmic development, software frameworks, and integration with existing
computing infrastructure are crucial for widespread adoption.
This paper explores the fundamentals of quantum computing, its recent breakthroughs,
and its future potential in reshaping computational science. The study presents quantitative
data on quantum computing investments, research trends, and real-world applications while
addressing technical and practical challenges. The findings highlight the need for interdisci
plinary collaboration between physicists, computer scientists, and engineers to overcome limi
tations and unlock quantum computing’s full potential
Files
IJICSITR_Y1F1A002.pdf
Files
(570.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:95b183254a15df67dd6419dae51cb7e0
|
570.4 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Arute, F., et al. (2019). "Quantum Supremacy Using a Programmable Superconducting Processor." Nature, 574(7779), 505-510.
- Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). "Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution and Coin Tossing." Pro-ceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems & Signal Processing, 175-179.
- Boixo, S., et al. (2018). "Characterizing Quantum Supremacy in Near-Term Devices." Nature Physics, 14(6), 595-600.
- DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000). "The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation." Fortschritte der Physik, 48(9-11), 771-783.
- Feynman, R. P. (1982). "Simulating Physics with Computers." International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(6-7), 467-488
- Grover, L. K. (1996). "A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Database Search." Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 212-219.
- Harrow, A. W., Hassidim, A., & Lloyd, S. (2009). "Quantum Algorithm for Linear Systems of Equations." Physical Review Letters, 103(15), 150502.
- IBM Quantum. (2021). The Roadmap for Scalable Quantum Computing. Retrieved from IBM Quantum
- Lloyd, S. (1996). "Universal Quantum Simulators." Science, 273(5278), 1073-1078
- Montanaro, A. (2016). "Quantum Algorithms: An Overview." npj Quantum Information, 2, 15023.
- Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th Anniversary ed.). Cam bridge University Press.
- Preskill, J. (2018). "Quantum Computing in the NISQ Era and Beyond." Quantum, 2, 79.
- Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978). "A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryp-tosystems." Communications of the ACM, 21(2), 120-126.
- Shor, P. W. (1994). "Algorithms for Quantum Computation: Discrete Logarithms and Factoring." Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 124-134.