Published March 25, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

AI and the Future of Disputing: Naming, Blaming, Claiming, and Preventing

Authors/Creators

Description

This paper explores the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on dispute resolution mechanisms. Our analysis builds on the longstanding framework for explaining the stages through which disputes evolve: the “naming, blaming, claiming” model by Felstiner, Abel, and Sarat (1981). Drawing on the evolution of online dispute resolution (ODR) and insights gained from the application of AI in healthcare, we examine how technological advancements challenge the traditional trajectory of dispute resolution. In particular, we propose a re- categorization of the stages of disputing, emphasizing the emergence of a “prevention” stage facilitated by AI. By incorporating AI into the existing theoretical framework, we argue that dispute processes are not only restructured at the individual level, in terms of how claims are raised and addressed, but also at a systemic level, in the way data is leveraged to identify patterns and potential sources of conflict.

Files

Files (87.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:cc520c4eadb692c1eb5954627579bd98
87.8 kB Download

Additional details

Funding

European Research Council
Horizon Europe ERC-2021-COG-101044195
European Commission
DRA - The 'Vanishing Third Party': Access to Justice, Procedural Justice and Substantive Justice in the Age of Dispute Resolution Automation 101044195

Dates

Accepted
2025-02-24

References

  • Ahuja, A. S. 2019. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine on the Future Role of the Physician." PeerJ 7: e7702.
  • Albiston, C. R., L. B. Edelman, and J. Milligan. 2014. "The Dispute Tree and the Legal Forest." Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10, no. 1: 105–131.
  • Alowais, S. A., S. S. Alghamdi, N. Alsuhebany, et al. 2023. "Revolutionizing Healthcare: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice." BMC Medical Education 23: 689 https://doi- org.ezproxy.haifa.ac.il/10.1186/s12909- 023- 04698- z.
  • Amsler Blomgren, L. 2003. Mediation at Work: Transforming Workplace Conflict at the United States Postal Service. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
  • Amsler Blomgren, L., J. K. Martinez, and S. E. Smith. 2020. Dispute System Design: Preventing, Managing, and Resolving Conflict. Stanford University Press.
  • Angwin, J., J. Larson, S. Mattu, and L. Kirchner. 2022. "Machine bias." In Ethics of Data and Analytics, edited by K. Martin, 254–264. Auerbach Publications. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1201/ 97810 03278290.
  • Araujo, T., N. Helberger, S. Kruikemeier, and C. H. De Vreese. 2020. "In AI We Trust? Perceptions About Automated Decision- Making by Artificial Intelligence." AI & SOCIETY 35, no. 3: 611–623. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s0014 6- 019- 00931 - w.
  • Barysė, D., and R. Sarel. 2024. "Algorithms in the Court: Does It Matter Which Part of the Judicial Decision- Making Is Automated?" Artificial Intelligence and Law 32: 117–146. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s1050 6- 022- 09343 - 6.
  • Bell, S. K., T. Delbanco, J. G. Elmore, et al. 2020. "Frequency and Types of Patient- Reported Errors in Electronic Health Record Ambulatory Care Notes." JAMA Network Open 3, no. 6: e205867. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ jaman etwor kopen. 2020. 5867.
  • Biden, J. R. 2023. "Executive Order 14110 on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence." Blake, R. 2023. "The Future of Healthcare: A Case for Online Dispute Resolution." International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution 10, no. 1.
  • Boussina, A., S. P. Shashikumar, A. Malhotra, et al. 2024. "Impact of a Deep Learning Sepsis Prediction Model on Quality of Care and Survival." npj Digital Medicine 7, no. 1: 14. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s4174 6- 023- 00986 - 6.
  • Caliskan, A., J. J. Bryson, and A. Narayanan. 2017. "Semantics Derived Automatically From Language Corpora Contain Human- Like Biases." Science 356, no. 6334: 183–186. https:// www. jstor. org/ stable/ 24918211.
  • Cestonaro, C., A. Delicati, B. Marcante, L. Caenazzo, and P. Tozzo. 2023. "Defining Medical Liability When Artificial Intelligence Is Applied on Diagnostic Algorithms: A Systematic Review." Frontiers in Medicine 10: 1305756. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fmed. 2023. 1305756.
  • Chagal- Feferkorn, K. A. 2019. "Am I an Algorithm or a Product: When Products Liability Should Apply to Algorithmic Decision- Makers." Stanford Law & Policy Review 30, no. 1: 61–114.
  • Chen, B. M., A. Stremitzer, and K. Tobia. 2022. "Having Your Day in Robot Court." Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 36: 127.
  • Chen, Z., W. Wang, H. Tian, et al. 2024. "How Far Are We to GPT- 4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models With Open- Source Suites." Science China Information Sciences 67, no. 12: 220101. https:// doi- org. ezpro xy. haifa. ac. il/ 10. 1007/ s1143 2- 024- 4231- 5.
  • Chen, Z. Z., J. Ma, X. Zhang, et al. 2024. "A Survey on Large Language Models for Critical Societal Domains: Finance, Healthcare, and Law." arXiv. https:// doi. org/ 10. 48550/ arxiv. 2405. 01769
  • Choi, J. H., K. E. Hickman, A. B. Monahan, and D. Schwarcz. 2021. "ChatGPT Goes to Law School." Journal of Legal Education 71, no. 3: 387–400.
  • Cohen, M. C., S. Dahan, and C. Rule. 2022. "Conflict Analytics: When Data Science Meets Dispute Resolution." Management and Business Review 2, no. 2: 86–92. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 26941 05820 22020 2003.
  • Conseil De Europa. 2018. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and Their Environment. Conseil De Europa.
  • Costantino, C. A., and C. S. Merchant. 1996. Designing Conflict Management Systems: A Guide to Creating Productive and Healthy Organizations. Jossey- Bass.
  • Crawford, K. 2021. The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press.
  • Dahan, S., and D. Liang. 2020. "The Case for AI- Powered Legal Aid." Queen's Law Journal 46, no. 2: 415–429.
  • Dahl, M., V. Magesh, M. Suzgun, and D. E. Ho. 2024. "Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models." Journal of Legal Analysis 16, no. 1: 64–93. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ jla/ laae003.
  • Delgado, R., C. Dunn, P. Brown, and H. Lee. 1985. "Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution." Wisconsin Law Review 6: 1359.
  • Dodge, J., Q. V. Liao, Y. Zhang, R. K. E. Bellamy, and C. Dugan. 2019. "Explaining Models: An Empirical Study of How Explanations Impact Fairness Judgment." In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 275–285. ACM. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 33012 75. 3302310.
  • Dullabh, P. M., N. K. Sondheimer, E. Katsh, and M. A. Evans. 2014. "How Patients Can Improve the Accuracy of Their Medical Records." EGEMS 2, no. 3: 1080. https:// doi. org/ 10. 13063/ 2327- 9214. 1080.
  • Ebner, N. 2012. "ODR and Interpersonal Trust." In ODR: Theory and Practice, edited by M. A. Wahab, E. Katsh, and D. Rainey. Eleven International Publishing.
  • Engstrom, D. F. 2021. "Digital Civil Procedure." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 169, no. 8: 2243–2289.
  • Engstrom, D. F., A. Sela, and K. Knowlton. 2024. "Courthouse AI and Access to Justice in the U.S." In Digital Courts: Integrating Human and Acritical Intelligence, edited by F. Esteban De La Rosa, N. M. Escalona, and P. Cortes. Oxford University Press.
  • Engstrom, N. F., and D. F. Engstrom. 2024. "The Making of the A2J Crisis." Stanford Law Review Online 75: 146–165.
  • Farr, C. 2018. This Patient's Medical Record Said She'd Given Birth Twice–in Fact, She'd Never Been Pregnant. CNBC. https:// www. hcinn ovati ongro up. com/ home/ artic le/ 13011 383/ this- patie nts- medic al- recor d- said- shed- given - birth - twice in- fact- shed- never - been- pregnant.
  • Felstiner, W. L., R. L. Abel, and A. Sarat. 1981. "The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming." Law and Society Review 15, no. 3: 631–654.
  • Fisher, R., and W. Ury. 1981. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Fiss, O. M. 1984. "Against Settlement." Yale Law Journal 93, no. 6: 1073– 1090. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/ 796205.
  • Froomkin, A. M. 2002. "Icann's Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy— Causes and (Partial) Cures." Brooklyn Law Review 67, no. 3: 605.
  • Gadlin, H. 2000. "The Ombudsman: What's in a Name?" Negotiation Journal 16, no. 1: 37–48.
  • Gadlin, H., and S. Sturm. 2007. "Conflict Resolution and Systemic Change." Journal of Dispute Resolution: 1–63.
  • Galanter, M. 1983. "Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) About Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society." UCLA Law Review 31: 4.
  • Gianfrancesco, M. A., S. Tamang, J. Yazdany, and G. Schmajuk. 2018. "Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data." JAMA Internal Medicine 178, no. 11: 1544–1547.
  • GPT- 4 Technical Report. 2023. Open AI. The General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679. ArXiv Submit/4812508 [cs.CL]. https:// arxiv. org/ abs/ 2303. 08774 .
  • Grgic- Hlaca, N., E. M. Redmiles, K. P. Gummadi, and A. Weller. 2018. "Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction." In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, 903–912. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 31788 76. 3186138.
  • Grillo, T. 1990. "The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women." Yale Law Journal 100, no. 6: 1545–1610.
  • Groton, J. P., C. Honeyman, and A. K. Schneider. 2017. "Thinking Ahead." In The Negotiator's Desk Reference, edited by C. Honeyman and A. Kupfer Schneider, 265–281. DRI press.
  • Guha, N., J. Nyarko, D. Ho, et al. 2024. "Legalbench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models." Advances in Neural information Processiong Systems 36: 44123–44279.
  • Hacohen, U. Y., and N. Elkin- Koren. 2024. "Copyright Regenerated: Harnessing Genai to Measure Originality and Copyright Scope." Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 37, no. 2: 557–608.
  • Harris, D. 2018. "Deepfakes: False Pornography Is Here and the Law Cannot Protect You." Duke Law & Technology Review 17: 99–127.
  • Hensler, D. R. 2003. "Our Courts, Ourselves: How the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement Is Re- Shaping Our Legal System." Penn State. Law Review 108: 165–197.
  • Katsh, E., and O. Rabinovich- Einy. 2017. Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes. Oxford University Press.
  • Katsh, E., and J. Rifkin. 2001. Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. Jossey- Bass.
  • Katsh, E., and C. Rule. 2015. "What We Know and Need to Know About Online Dispute Resolution." South Carolina Law Review 67, no. 2: 329–344.
  • Katsh, E., N. Sondheimer, P. Dullabh, and S. Stromberg. 2011. "Is There an App for That- Electronic Health Records (EHRS) and a New Environment of Conflict Prevention and Resolution." Law and Contemporary Problems 74, no. 3: 31–56.
  • Keller, B., A. Labrique, K. M. Jain, A. Pekosz, and O. Levine. 2014. "Mind the Gap: Social Media Engagement by Public Health Researchers." Journal of Medical Internet Research 16, no. 1: e8.
  • Kennedy, R. P., P. D. Waggoner, and M. M. Ward. 2022. "Trust in Public Policy Algorithms." Journal of Politics 84, no. 2: 1132–1148.
  • Kritzer, H. M. 1999. "The Professions Are Dead, Long Live the Professions: Legal Practice in a Postprofessional World." Law and Society Review 33, no. 3: 713–759.
  • Kuk, M., and J. Harasta. 2025. "LLMs & Legal Aid: Understanding Legal Needs Exhibited Through User Queries." arXiv. https:// doi. org/ 10. 48550/ arxiv. 2501. 01711 .
  • Lavi, M., and H. Y. Jabotinsky. 2024. "AI in the Courtroom: The Boundaries of RoboLawyers and RoboJudges." Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 35: 286–389.
  • Lear, R., L. Freise, M. Kybert, A. Darzi, A. L. Neves, and E. K. Mayer. 2022. "Patients' Willingness and Ability to Identify and Respond to Errors in Their Personal Health Records: Mixed Methods Analysis of Cross- Sectional Survey Data." Journal of Medical Internet Research 24, no. 7: e37226. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 37226 .
  • Lemley, M. A. 2023. "How Generative AI Turns Copyright upside down." https:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 2139/ ssrn. 4517702.
  • Leslie, D., A. Mazumder, A. Peppin, M. K. Wolters, and A. Hagerty. 2021. "Does "AI" Stand for Augmenting Inequality in the Era of Covid- 19 Healthcare?" BMJ 372: n304. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ bmj. n304.
  • Levine, S. S., and D. Jain. 2023. "How Network Effects Make AI Smarter." Harvard Business Review, March 14. https:// hbr. org/ 2023/ 03/ how- netwo rk- effec ts- make- ai- smarter.
  • Lipsky, D. B., R. L. Seeber, and R. D. Fincher. 2003. Emerging Systems for Managing Workplace Conflict: Lessons From American Corporations for Managers and Dispute Resolution Professionals. Jossey- Bass.
  • Lum, G., and J. Martinez. 2025. "Conflict, Disputes, and System Design". In The Cambridge Handbook on AI and Civil Dispute Resolution, edited by A. J. Schmitz, P. Ortolani, and M. Giacalone. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lyons, P. G., M. R. Hofford, C. Y. Sean, et al. 2023. "Factors Associated With Variability in the Performance of a Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model Across 9 Networked Hospitals in the US." JAMA Internal Medicine 183, no. 6: 611–612.
  • Menkel- Meadow, C. 1996. "The Trouble With the Adversary System in a Post- Modern, Multi- Cultural World." Journal of the Institute for the Study of Legal Ethics 1: 6. https:// schol arlyc ommons. law. hofst ra. edu/ jisle/ vol1/ iss1/ 6.
  • Menkel- Meadow, C. 2012. "Informal, Formal and 'Semi- Formal' Justice in the United States." In Civil Procedure in Cross- Cultural Dialogue: Eurasia Context, edited by D. Malesin. Statut Publishing House.
  • Menkel- Meadow, C. 2016. "Is ODR ADR: Reflections of an ADR Founder From 15th ODR Conference, the Hague, The Netherlands, 22- 23 May 2016." International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution 3, no. 1: 4–7.
  • Menkel- Meadow, C., and R. Dingwall. 2017. "Scripts: What to Do When Big Bad Companies Won't Negotiate." In The Negotiator's Desk Reference, edited by C. Honeyman and A. Kupfer Schneider, 711–724. DRI Press.
  • Mentovich, A., J. J. Prescott, and O. Rabinovich- Einy. 2023. "Legitimacy and Online Proceedings: Procedural Justice, Access to Justice, and the Role of Income." Law and Society Review 57, no. 2: 189–213.
  • Obermeyer, Z., B. Powers, C. Vogeli, and S. Mullainathan. 2019. "Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations." Science 366, no. 6464: 447–453.
  • O'Leary, D. 2022. "Life Beyond Zoom: The Promise of Emerging Virtual Court Alternatives." Washburn Law Journal 62: 587.
  • Olesen, A., and O. Hammerslev. 2023. "The Dynamic and Iterative Pre- Dispute Phase: The Transformation From a Justiciable Problem Into a Legal Dispute." Journal of Law and Society 50, no. 1: 120–138.
  • O'neil, C. 2017. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
  • Orr, D., and C. Rule. 2021. "Online Dispute Resolution." In Legal Informatics, 409–415. Cambridge University Press.
  • Perlman, A. 2023. "The Implications of ChatGPT for Legal Services and Society." Michigan Technology Law Review 30: 1.
  • Rabinovich- Einy, O. 2006. "Technology's Impact: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Accountability in Mediation." Harvard Negototiation Law Review 11: 253.
  • Rabinovich- Einy, O. 2021. "The Past, Present, and Future of Online Dispute Resolution." Current Legal Problems 74, no. 1: 125–148.
  • Rabinovich- Einy, O. 2022. "Process Pluralism in the Post- COVID Dispute Resolution Landscape." Texas A&M Law Review 10: 55.
  • Rabinovich- Einy, O., and E. Katsh. 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Dispute Resolution: The Age of AI- DR." In Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice, edited by M. A. Wahab, D. Rainey, and E. Katsh. Eleven International Publishing.
  • Rabinovich- Einy, O., and E. Katsh. 2012. "Technology and the Future of Dispute Systems Design." Harvard Negotiation Law Review 17: 151.
  • Rachum- Twaig, O. 2020. "Whose Robot Is It Anyway?: Liability for Artificial- Intelligence- Based Robots." University of Illinois Law Review 2020: 1141.
  • Ramasastry, A. 2004. "Symposium, Government- to- Citizen Online Dispute Resolution: A Preliminary Inquiry." Washington Law review 79: 159.
  • Restrepo, D., A. Rodman, and R. E. Abdulnour. 2024. "Conversations on Reasoning: Large Language Models in Diagnosis." Journal of Hospital Medicine 19, no. 1: 731–735.
  • Rule, C. 2016. "Designing a Global Online Dispute Resolution System: Lessons Learned From eBay." University Od St. Thomas Law Journal 13: 354.
  • Sahagian, S. 2021. "iLawyer." UCLA Journal of Law & Technology 3, no. 1: 1–31.
  • Samuelson, P. 2024. "Thinking About Possible Remedies in the Generative AI Copyright Cases." Communications of the ACM 67, no. 7: 27–30.
  • Sandefur, R. L. 2007. "The Importance of Doing Nothing: Everyday Problems and Responses of Inaction." In Transforming Lives: Law and Social Process, edited by P. Pleasence, A. Buck, and N. Balmer. Stationery Office Books.
  • Sandefur, R. L. 2008. "Access to Civil Justice and Race, Class, and Gender Inequality." Annual Review of Sociology 34, no. 1: 339–358.
  • Sander, F. E. A. 1976. "Varieties of Dispute Processing." 70 FRD 111: 130–131.
  • Schmitz, A. J. 2024. "Responsible Use of AI in Civil Dispute Resolution." In Responsible Use of AI in Civil Dispute Resolution, 870. Ohio State Legal Studies Research Paper.
  • Schmitz, A. J., and J. Martinez. 2021. "ODR and Innovation in the United States." In Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice: A Treatise on Technology and Dispute Resolution, edited by D. Rainey, E. Katsh, and M. A. Wahab, 2nd ed., 611. Eleven.
  • Sela, A. 2016. "Streamlining Justice: How Online Courts Can Resolve the Challenges of Pro Se Litigation." Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 26, no. 2: 331.
  • Sela, A. 2018. "Can Computers Be Fair: How Automated and Human- Powered Online Dispute Resolution Affect Procedural Justice in Mediation and Arbitration." Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 33: 91.
  • Solove, D. J. 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Privacy." Florida Law Review 77, no. 1: 3–73. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2139/ ssrn. 4713111.
  • Sternlight, J. R. 2020. "Pouring a Little Psychological Cold Water on Online Dispute Resolution." Journal of Dispute Resolution 2020, no. 1: 1–30.
  • Sun, Z. 2023. "A Short Survey of Viewing Large Language Models in Legal Aspect." arXiv: 2303.09136.
  • Sunstein, C. R. 2021. "Can the Government Regulate Deepfakes?": The Wall Street Journal, January 7. https:// www. wsj. com/ artic les/ can- the- gover nment - regul ate- deepf akes- 11610 038590.
  • Susskind, R. 1987. "Expert Systems in Law and the Data Protection Adviser." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7, no. 1: 145–151. Susskind, R. 2008. The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
  • Susskind, R. 2019. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford University Press.
  • Susskind, R. 2020. "The Future of Courts—Remote Courts." The Practice Magazine, July/August. https:// clp. law. harva rd. edu/ knowl edge- hub/ magaz ine/ issues/ remot e- courts/ the- futur e- of- courts/ .
  • Susskind, R., and D. Susskind. 2015. The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford University Press.
  • Tan, J., H. Westermann, N. R. Pottanigari, et al. 2024. "Robots in the Middle: Evaluating LLMs in Dispute Resolution." In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 168–179. IOS Press.
  • Tessler, M. H., M. A. Bakker, D. Jarrett, et al. 2024. "AI Can Help Humans Find Common Ground in Democratic Deliberation." Science 386, no. 6719: eadq2852.
  • The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Spot. n.d. https://spot.suffolklitlab.org/.
  • Thiessen, E., and G. Ross. 2021. "Live Demonstration of a Working Collaborative Enegotiation System (Smartsettle Infinity)." In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 275–276. Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Trozze, A., T. Davies, and B. Kleinberg. 2024. "Large Language Models in Cryptocurrency Securities Cases: Can a GPT Model Meaningfully Assist Lawyers?" Artificial Intelligence and Law 8: 1–47.
  • Tsurel, D., M. Doron, A. Nus, A. Dagan, I. Guy, and D. Shahaf. 2020. "E- Commerce Dispute Resolution Prediction." In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 1465– 1474. Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. Yale University.
  • Tyler, T., M. Katsaros, T. Meares, and S. Venkatesh. 2021. "Social Media Governance: Can Social Media Companies Motivate Voluntary Rule Following Behavior Among Their Users?" Journal of Experimental Criminology 17: 109–127.
  • Ury, W. L., J. M. Brett, and S. B. Goldberg. 1988. "Designing an Effective Dispute Resolution System." Negotiation Journal 4, no. 4: 413–431.
  • Van Berkel, N., J. Goncalves, D. Russo, S. Hosio, and M. B. Skov. 2021. "Effect of Information Presentation on Fairness Perceptions of Machine Learning Predictors." In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Waggoner, P. D., R. Kennedy, H. Le, and M. Shiran. 2019. "Big Data and Trust in Public Policy Automation." Statistics, Politics and Policy 10, no. 2: 115–136.
  • Waldman, A., and K. Martin. 2022. "Governing Algorithmic Decisions: The Role of Decision Importance and Governance on Perceived Legitimacy of
  • Algorithmic Decisions." Big Data & Society 9, no. 1. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 20539 51722 1100449.
  • Welsh, N. A. 2019. "Bringing Transparency and Accountability (With a Dash of Competition) to Court- Connected Dispute Resolution." Fordham Law Review 88, no. 6: 2449.
  • Westermann, H., J. Savelka, and K. Benyekhlef. 2023. "LLMediator: GPT- 4 Assisted Online Dispute Resolution." In Proceedings of the ICAIL 2023 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Access to Justice, 1–12. Association for Computing Machinery. arXiv:2307.16732v1.
  • Wing, L., J. Martinez, E. Katsh, and C. Rule. 2021. "Designing Ethical Online Dispute Resolution Systems: The Rise of the Fourth Party." Negotiation Journal 37, no. 1: 49–64.
  • Wiratunga, N., R. Abeyratne, L. Jayawardena, et al. 2024. "CBR- RAG: Case- Based Reasoning for Retrieval Augmented Generation in LLMs for Legal Question Answering." In International Conference on Case- Based Reasoning, 445–460. Springer Nature Switzerland.
  • Wong, A., E. Otles, J. P. Donnelly, et al. 2021. "External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients." JAMA Internal Medicine 181, no. 8: 1065–1070.
  • Yalcin, G., E. Themeli, E. Stamhuis, S. Philipsen, and S. Puntoni. 2023. "Perceptions of Justice by Algorithms." Artificial Intelligence and Law 31, no. 2: 269–292.
  • Yamamoto, E. K. 1995. "ADR: Where Have the Critics Gone." Santa Clara Law Review 36: 1055.