Published December 18, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Aplicarea conceptului de servicii ecosistemice în acvacultură. Review.

  • 1. EDMO icon Research and Development Institute for Aquatic Ecology, Fisheries and Aquaculture - Galati
  • 2. Institutul de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Ecologie Acvatica, Pescuit si Acvacultura
  • 3. Institute of Research and Development for Aquatic Ecology, Fishing and Aquaculture
  • 4. ROR icon "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati
  • 5. INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH - DEVELOPMENT FOR AQUATIC ECOLOGY, FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE
  • 6. Institutul de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Ecologie Acvatica, Pescuit și Acvacultura, Galați

Description

Ecosistemele, prin serviciile lor de furnizare, reglare, susținere și culturale, joacă un rol vital în menținerea echilibrului ecologic și în asigurarea resurselor necesare pentru acvacultură. Integrarea acestor servicii în practicile de acvacultură poate contribui la îmbunătățirea calității apei, reglarea nutrienților, captarea carbonului și protejarea biodiversității. Studiul subliniază necesitatea unei gestionări ecologice și a unor strategii inovatoare pentru a minimiza impactul negativ asupra mediului și a maximiza beneficiile aduse de acvacultură, având în vedere provocările legate de creșterea populației globale și schimbările climatice.

Files

Pescuitul-Acvacultura_1-2_2024_021.pdf

Files (487.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0bf91f6de256fff65a05626fe3a1085e
487.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2024-12-18

References

  • Ahmed, N., Glaser, M. (2016). Coastal aquaculture, mangrove deforestation and blue carbon emissions: is REDD+ a solution? Mar. Policy 66, 58–66.
  • Ahmed, M., & Lorica, M.H. (2002). Improving developing country food security through aquaculture development—lessons from Asia. Food Policy, 27(2), 125-141.
  • Alleway, H.K., Gillies, C.L., Bishop, M.J., Gentry, R.R., Theuerkauf, S.J., & Jones, R. (2019). The ecosystem services of marine aquaculture: valuing benefits to people and nature. BioScience, 69(1), 59-68.
  • Alleway, H.K., Waters, T.J., Brummett, R., Cai, J., Cao, L., Cayten, M.R., Costa-Pierce, B.A., Dong, Y.-W., Brandstrup Hansen, S.C., Liu, S., Liu, Q., Shelley, C., Theuerkauf, S.J., Tucker, L., Wang, Y., & Jones, R.C. (2023). Global principles for restorative aquaculture to foster aquaculture practices that benefit the environment. Conservation Science and Practice, 5(8), e12982.
  • Alpine, A.E., Cloern, J.E. (1992) Trophic interactions and direct physical effects control phytoplankton biomass and production in an estuary. Limnol Oceanogr 37:946–955.
  • Anh, P.T., Kroeze, C., Bush, S.R. and Mol, A.P.J. (2010), Water pollution by Pangasius production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: causes and options for control. Aquaculture Research, 42: 108-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02578.x.
  • Barbier, E., Baumgärtner, S., Chopra, K., Costello, C., Duraiappah, A., Hassan, R., Kinzig, A., Lehman, M., Pascual, U., Polasky, S., Perrings, C. (2009). 'The valuation of ecosystem services'. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0018.
  • Baulcomb, C. (2013). Ecosystem services in agricultural and urban landscapes. In: Wratten, S., Sandhu, H., Cullen, R., Costanza, R. (Eds.), Aquaculture and Ecosystem Services: Reframing the Environmental and Social Debate. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 58–82.
  • Brugère, C., Aguilar‐Manjarrez, J., Beveridge, M. C., & Soto, D. (2019). The ecosystem approach to aquaculture 10 years on–a critical review and consideration of its future role in blue growth. Reviews in Aquaculture, 11(3), 493-514.
  • Chan K.M.A., Shaw M.R., Cameron D.R., Underwood E.C., Daily G.C. (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLOS Biol 4: 2e379
  • Chapin, F.S., Stephen R. Carpenter, Gary P. Kofinas, et al. (2010). Ecosystem Stewardship: Sustainability Strategies for a Rapidly Changing Planet." Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 25 (4):241-249.
  • Comisia Europeană (2020). 2020 Blue Economy Report: Blue Sectors Contribute to the Recovery and Pave Way for EU Green Deal. Accesat în data de 09.08.2024 la https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_986.
  • Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, G., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., Belt, M., Belt, H. (1996). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. Report of Workshop organised by NCEAS, Santa Barbara, Calif. 387.
  • Costanza R., de Groot R., Sutton P., van der Ploeg S., Anderson S.J., Kubiszewski I. et al. (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26: 152–158.
  • Custódio, M., Villasante, S., Calado, R., Lillebø, A.I. (2019). Valuation of Ecosystem Services to promote sustainable aquaculture practices. Reviews in Aquaculture. 1-14. 10.1111/raq.12324.
  • Da, C.T., Hung, L.T., Berg, H., Lindberg, J.E., Lundh, T., 2011. Evaluation of potential feed sources, and technical and economic considerations of small-scale commercial striped catfish Pangasius hypothalamus pond farming systems in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Aquat. Res., 1–13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03048.x.
  • Daily, G. (1997). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. (Ed.). Island Press.
  • Dame RF (1996) Ecology of marine bivalves: an ecosystem approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 254 pp
  • De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M., Boumans, R. (2002). A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41 (3), 393–408.
  • Duarte, C. M., Wu, J., Xiao, X., Bruhn, A., & Krause-Jensen, D. (2017). Can seaweed farming play a role in climate change mitigation and adaptation? Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 100.
  • Duarte, C. M., Bruhn, A., & Krause-Jensen, D. (2022). A seaweed aquaculture imperative to meet global sustainability targets. Nature Sustainability, 5(3), 185-193.
  • Edwards P. (1999) Aquaculture and poverty: past, present and future prospects of impact. A discussion paper prepared for the Fifth Fisheries Development Donor Consultation, Rome, Italy, 22^24 February 1999.
  • Evans, K.S., Chen, X., & Robichaud, C.A. (2017). Living in close quarters? A hedonic analysis of the impact of marine aquaculture on coastal housing prices in Maine.
  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation) - The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals. Rome, Italy.
  • Ferreira, J.G., Bricker, S.B., 2016. Goods and services of extensive aquaculture: shellfish culture and nutrient trading. Aquacult. Int. 24 (3), 803–825.
  • Folke, C., Kautsky, N., Berg, H., Jansson, Å., & Troell, M. (1998). The ecological footprint concept for sustainable seafood production: a review. Ecological Applications, 8(sp1), S63-S71.
  • Gentry, R.R., Alleway, H.K., Bishop, M.J., Gillies, C.L., Waters, T., & Jones, R. (2020). Exploring the potential for marine aquaculture to contribute to ecosystem services. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(2), 499-512.
  • Gómez-Baggethun E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics, Volume 69, Issue 6, 1209-1218, ISSN 0921-8009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007.
  • Gradinariu, G. (2012). Conceptul de "servicii de ecosistem" – abordare economică. Revista Română de Statistică nr. 8. Accesată în data de 09.08.2024 la https://www.revistadestatistica.ro/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/RRS_7_2012_A4_ro1.pdf
  • Gunawardena, M., Rowan, J.S. (2005). Economic valuation of a mangrove ecosystem threatened by shrimp aquaculture in Sri Lanka. Environ. Manage. 36 (4), 535–550.
  • Hambrey, J., Edwards, P., Belton, B. (2008). An ecosystem approach to freshwater aquaculture: a global. Building an Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture, 117.
  • Han, T., Shi, R., Qi, Z., Huang, H., Liang, Q., & Liu, H. (2017). Interactive effects of oyster and seaweed on seawater dissolved inorganic carbon systems: Implications for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 9, 469-478.
  • Henriksson, P.J.G.., Troell, M., Banks, L.K., Belton, B., Beveridge, M.C.M., Klinger, D.H., Pelletier, N., Phillips, M.J. & Tran, N. (2021). Interventions for improving the productivity and environmental performance of global aquaculture for future food security. One Earth, 4(9), 1220-1232.
  • Liu, J., et.al (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. science, 317(5844), 1513-1516.
  • Marinho-Soriano, E., Azevedo, C.A.A., Trigueiro, T.G., Pereira, D.C., Carneiro, M.A.A., & Camara, M.R. (2011). Bioremediation of aquaculture wastewater using macroalgae and Artemia. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 65(1), 253-257.
  • Mathé S, Rey-Valette H (2015) Local knowledge of pond fishfarming ecosystem services: management implications of stakeholders' perceptions in three different contexts (Brazil, France and Indonesia). Sustainability 7: 7644−7666.
  • MEA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment). (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  • Overton, K., Dempster, T., Swearer, S.E., Morris, R.L., & Barrett, L.T. (2023). Achieving conservation and restoration outcomes through ecologically beneficial aquaculture. Conservation Biology, e14065.
  • Pearce, D. (1998). Auditing the earth: the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustainable Dev. 40 (2), 23–28.
  • Popp J, Békefi E, Duleba S, Oláh J (2019) Multifunctionality of pond fish farms in the opinion of the farm managers: the case of Hungary. Rev Aquacult 11: 830−847.
  • Pullin, R.S.V. (1993). An overview of environmental issues in developing-country aquaculture. In: Pullin, R.S.V., Rosenthal, H. Maclean, J.L., (Eds.). Ecological & Environment, Environment and Aquaculture in Developing Countries, vol. 31, pp. 1–19.
  • Saurel, C., Ferreira, J., Cheney, D., Suhrbier, A., Dewey, B., Davis, J., Cordell, J. (2014). Ecosystem goods and services from Manila clam culture in Puget Sound: a modelling analysis. Aquacult. Environ. Interact. 5(3), 255–270.
  • Sondak, C. F., Ang, P. O., Beardall, J., Bellgrove, A., Boo, S. M., Gerung, G. S., Hepburn, C. D., Hong, D. D., Hu, Z., Kawai, H., Largo, D., Lee, J. A., Lim, P. E., Mayakun, J., Nelson, W. A., Oak, J. H., Phang, S. M., Sahoo, D., Peerapornpis, Y., Yang, Y. & Chung, I. K. (2017). Carbon dioxide mitigation potential of seaweed aquaculture beds (SABs). Journal of Applied Phycology, 29, 2363-2373.
  • Tacon, A.G., & Metian, M. (2013). Fish matters: importance of aquatic foods in human nutrition and global food supply. Reviews in fisheries Science, 21(1), 22-38.
  • TEEB (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity - Mainstreaming The Economics Of Nature A Synthesis Of The Approach, Conclusions And Recommendations Of Teeb.
  • Tovar, A., Moreno, C., Mánuel-Vez, M. P., & Garcı́a-Vargas, M. (2000). Environmental impacts of intensive aquaculture in marine waters. Water Research, 34(1), 334-342.
  • Troell, M., Rönnbäck, P., Halling, C., Kautsky, N., & Buschmann, A. (1999). Ecological engineering in aquaculture: Use of seaweeds for removing nutrients from intensive mariculture. Journal of Applied Phycology, 11(1), 89–97.
  • Troell, M., Naylor, R. L., Metian, M., Beveridge, M., Tyedmers, P. H., Folke, C., ... & De Zeeuw, A. (2014). Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(37), 13257-13263.
  • Turkowski, K. Fish Farmers' Perception of Ecosystem Services and Diversification of Carp Pond Aquaculture: A Case Study from Warmia and Mazury, Poland. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052797.
  • United Nations Population Fund. World population trends. Accesat în 09.08.2024 la https://www.unfpa.org/world-population-trends#summery105943.
  • van den Burg, S.W.K., Termeer, E.E.W., Skirtun, M., Poelman, M., Veraart, J.A., & Selnes, T. (2022). Exploring mechanisms to pay for ecosystem services provided by mussels, oysters and seaweeds. Ecosystem Services, 54, 101407.
  • Vardan, H. (2023). The biosphere: A complex and interconnected web of life. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 13: 55-57.
  • Weitzman, J. (2019). Applying the ecosystem services concept to aquaculture: A review of approaches, definitions, and uses. Ecosystem Services, 35, 194-206.
  • World Bank. (2006). Aquaculture: Changing the Face of the Waters.World Bank,Washington, DC, USA,136pp.
  • Ysebaert, T., Hart, M. & Herman, P.M.J. (2009). Impacts of bottom and suspended cultures of mussels Mytilus spp. on the surrounding sedimentary environment and macrobenthic biodiversity. Helgol Mar Res 63, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-008-0136-5.
  • Zavalloni, M., Groeneveld, R.A., van Zwieten, P.A.M. (2014). The role of spatial information in the preservation of the shrimp nursery function of mangroves: a spatially explicit bio-economic model for the assessment of land use trade-offs. J. Environ. Manage. 143, 17–25.
  • Ziv, G., Baran, E., Nam, S., Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., & Levin, S. A. (2012). Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(15), 5609-5614.