Published March 15, 2025 | Version v1

Tsallis Entropy from Maximization of Entropy and the Condition of Stability Part 2

Authors/Creators

Description

 In Part I, we argued that F(p(ei/T)) = -ei/T, where p(ei/T) is an unnormalized probability. We suggested that one may find Tsallis entropy from p(ei) power q dF/dp(ei) =1  ((1)), where F= lnq(p(ei)) and Tsallis entropy is:  Sum over i   p(ei) power q lnq(p(ei)). We argued that this was due to stability considerations.

   Here we consider the importance of information especially that contained in an a priori constraint. We start with the Maxwell-Boltzmann case and introduce a function F such that F(p(ei)) = -ei/T, where ei/T is key energy information. We note that such information is also contained in an a priori constraint:   Sum over i p1(ei) ei = Etotal. Here p1(ei) is normalized and p(ei) is not. We write:Sum over i p(ei) F(p(ei)) = Sum over i  (-ei/T) p(ei) and suggest taking d/dp(ei). The point we make is that d/dp(ei) acting on p(ei) leaves F(p(ei)) free to display the relevant information linked with the average energy constraint and so the second part of the derivative: p(ei) dF(p(ei)/dp cannot reveal any more ei/T information and must be a constant, i.e.  p(ei) dF/dp(ei) = 1, for example. This restriction of information immediately yields F(p) = ln(p). 

   Very similar arguments apply to the Tsallis case, but here the information linked with an a priori constraint is now:  Sum over ei p1(ei) power q and so considers  Sum over i p(ei) power q F(p(ei)).

   We note that even though there are similarities with the math procedure of extremization, it is really the informational content of the a priori constraint that is considered here. We do not explicitly set out to maximize any function (with some physical meaning) subject to constraints.

 

Files

physTsallisStablility2.pdf

Files (90.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a2489c0a683dc57e480e5d4bf2c6875c
90.9 kB Preview Download