Published March 11, 2025 | Version v1
Book chapter Open

Decision Making on Sustainable Alternatives Using Plithogenic Pythagorean Hypersoft Sets with Possibility Degrees

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Research Scholar, Department of Mathematics, Arul Anandar College (Autonomous),Karumathur, (Affiliated to Madurai Kamaraj University)
  • 2. Department of Mathematics, Arul Anandar College(Autonomous), Karmathur (Affiliated to Madurai Kamaraj University), nivetha.martin710@gmail.com
  • 3. Department of Mathematics, Payame Noour University, P. O. Box. 19395-4697,Tehran

Description

Plithogenic sets are more robust in decision making. This work conjoins the aspects of Plithogenic hypersoft sets, Pythagorean sets and possibility theory. This research work explores the applications of Plithogenic based Pythagorean Hypersoft sets with possibility degree in studying on sustainable alternatives. This novel integrated decision framework proposed in this work offers more flexibility to the decision makers in accommodating intricate data representations. The integrated decision model is applied to the selection-based decision-making problem of waste management. The results of the model demonstrate the efficacy and robustness of the model. The proposed decision-making architecture shall be dealt with extended plithogenic hypersoft sets and combined Plithogenic Hypersoft Sets (PHSs). This integrated model shall be leveraged in complex decision-making systems.

Files

chapter-14-Sathya et al.pdf

Files (4.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:22ad50f7044d580f213474008b292518
4.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • [1] Smarandache, F. (2018). Plithogenic set, an extension of crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets revisited.Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 21,153-166. [2] Smarandache, F. (2023). Distinction between plithogenic set vs. plithogenic hypersoft set. nidus idearum. Scilogs, XI: in-turns and out-turns. Educational Publisher, 74-75. https://philarchive.org/archive/SMANIS-11. [3] Rahman, A. U., Saeed, M., & Abd El-WahedKhalifa, H. (2024). Multi-attribute decision-making based on aggregations and similarity measures of neutrosophic hypersoft sets with possibility setting. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 36(2), 161-186. [4] Rana, S., Qayyum, M., Saeed, M., Smarandache, F., & Khan, B. A. (2019).Plithogenic fuzzy whole hypersoft set, construction of operators and their application in frequency matrix multi attribute decision making technique.Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 28, 34-50. [5] Majid, S. Z., Saeed, M., Ishtiaq, U., & Argyros, I. K. (2024). The development of a hybrid model for dam site selection using a fuzzy hypersoft set and a plithogenic multipolar fuzzy hypersoft set. Foundations, 4(1), 32-46.doi: 10.3390/foundations4010004 [6] Martin, N., &Smarandache, F. (2020).Concentric plithogenic hypergraph based on plithogenic hypersoft sets.Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 33, 79-90. [7] Martin, N., &Smarandache, F. (2020).Introduction to combined plithogenic hypersoft sets. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 35, 503-510. [8] Gayen, S., Smarandache, F., Jha, S., Singh, M. K., Broumi, S., & Kumar, R. (2020). Introduction to plithogenic hypersoft subgroup. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 33, 209- 233. [9] Basumatary, B., Wary, N., Saeed, M., &Saqlain, M. (2021).On some properties of plithogenic neutrosophic hypersoft almost topological group. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 43, 169-179. [10] Dhivya, E., & Lancy, A. A. (2022). Near plithogenic hypersoft sets. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2516, No. 1). AIP Publishing, 200015 (1-7). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108639 [11] Dhivya, E., & Lancy, A. A. (2022). Strong continuity on near plithogenic neutrosophic hypersoft functions. Stochastic Modeling and Applications, 26(3), 231-236. [12] Martin, N., Smarandache, F., & Broumi, S. (2021). Covid-19 decision-making model using extended plithogenic hypersoft sets with dual dominant attributes. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 13(2), 75-86. [13] Ahmad, M. R., Saeed, M., Afzal, U., & Yang, M. S. (2020). A novel MCDM method based on plithogenic hypersoft sets under fuzzy neutrosophic environment. Symmetry, 12(11), 1855. [14] Rahman, A. U., Saeed, M., Khalifa, H. A. E. W., &Afifi, W. A. (2022). Decision making algorithmic techniques based on aggregation operations and similarity measures of possibility intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft sets. AIMS Mathematics,7(3), 3866-3895. [15] Rahman, A. U., Saeed, M., Mohammed, M. A., Krishnamoorthy, S., Kadry, S., & Eid, F. (2022). An integrated algorithmic MADM approach for heart diseases' diagnosis based on neutrosophic hypersoft set with possibility degree-based setting. Life, 12(5), 729.https://doi.org/10.3390/life12050729 [16] Rahman, A. U., Saeed, M., Mohammed, M. A., Abdulkareem, K. H., Nedoma, J., & Martinek, R. (2023). Fppsv-NHSS: Fuzzy parameterized possibility single valued neutrosophic hypersoft set to site selection for solid waste management. Applied Soft Computing,140, 110273. [17] Zhao, J., Li, B., Rahman, A. U., & Saeed, M. (2023). An intelligent multiple-criteria decision-making approach based on sv-neutrosophic hypersoft set with possibility degree setting for investment selection. Management Decision, 61(2), 472-485. [18] Rahman, A. U., Saeed, M., & Garg, H. (2022). An innovative decisive framework for optimized agri-automobile evaluation and HRM pattern recognition via possibility fuzzy hypersoft setting. Advances in Mechanical Engineering,14(10), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132221132146 [19] Rahman, A. U., Smarandache, F., Saeed, M., & Khan, K. A. (2023). Development of some new hybrid structures of hypersoft set with possibility-degree settings.Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4651987 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4651987 [20] Rahman, A. U., Saeed, M., & Abd El-Wahed Khalifa, H. (2024). Multi-attribute decision-making based on aggregations and similarity measures of neutrosophic hypersoft sets with possibility setting. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 36(2), 161-186. [21] Saeed, M., Wahab, A., Ali, M., Ali, J., & Bonyah, E. (2023). An innovative approach to passport quality assessment based on the possibility q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy hypersoft set. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19379 [22] Al-Hijjawi, S., &Alkhazaleh, S. (2023). Possibility Neutrosophic Hypersoft Set (PNHSS). Neutrosophic Sets and Systems,53, 117-129. [23] Martin, N. (2024). Introduction to possibility plithogenic soft sets. Plithogenic Logic and Computation,1, 61-72. [24] Zulqarnain, R.M., Siddique, I., Ali, R., Jarad, F., Iampan, A. (2023). Einstein weighted geometric operator for pythagorean fuzzy hypersoft with its application in material selection. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 135(3), 2557-2583. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.023040 [25] Jafar, M. N., Muniba, K., & Yang, M. S. (2024). Aggregation operators on Pythagorean fuzzy hypersoft matrices with application in the selection of wastewater treatment plants. IEEE Access, 12, 3187-3199. [26] Khan, N., Ayaz, S., Siddique, I., Ahmad, H., Askar, S., & Zulqarnain, R. M. (2023). Sustainable practices to reduce environmental impact of industry using interaction aggregation operators under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy hypersoft set. AIMS Mathematics,8(6), 14644-14683. [27] Martin, N., Smarandache, F., &Broumi, S. (2021). PROMTHEE plithogenic Pythagorean hypergraphic approach in smart materials selection. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 13, 52-60. [28] Ye, J. (2013). Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. International Journal of General Systems, 42(4), 386-394. [29] Biswas, P, Pramanik, S. & Giri, B. C. (2014). Entropy based grey relational analysis method for multi-attribute decision making under single valued neutrosophic assessments. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2, 102-110. [30] Pramanik, S., Dalapati, S., Alam, S., Smarandache, S., & Roy, T. K. (2018). NS-cross entropy based MAGDM under single valued neutrosophic set environment. Information, 9(2), 37; doi: 10.3390/info9020037 [31] Pramanik, S., Biswas, P., & Giri, B. C. (2017). Hybrid vector similarity measures and their applications to multi-attribute decision making under neutrosophic environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 28 (5),1163-1176. doi: 10.1007/s00521-015-2125-3 [32] Mallick, R., Pramanik, S., & Giri, B. C. (2023). Neutrosophic MAGDM based on CRITIC-EDAS strategy using geometric aggregation operator. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 33 (4), 683-698.http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/YJOR221017016M [33] Smarandache, F., Ricardo, J. E., Caballero, E. G., Vázquez, M. Y. L., &Hernández, N. B. (2020). Delphi method for evaluating scientific research proposals in a neutrosophic environment. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 34, 204-213. [34] Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., & Giri, B. C. (2016). TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(3), 727-737. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-1891-2. [35] Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., & Giri, B. C. (2019). Non-linear programming approach for single-valued neutrosophic TOPSIS method. New Mathematics and Natural Computation, 15 (2), 307-326. doi:10.1142/S1793005719500169. [36] Mondal, K., Pramanik, S., & Smarandache, F. (2016). Role of neutrosophic logic in data mining. In F. Smarandache, & S. Pramanik(Eds.), New trends in neutrosophic theory and application (pp. 15-23).Brussels, Belgium: Pons Editions. [37] Pramanik, S., Das, S., Das, R., &Tripathy, B. C. (2023). Neutrosophic BWM-TOPSIS strategy under SVNS environment. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 56, 178-189. [38] Smarandache, F. (2018). Extension of soft set to hypersoft set, and then to plithogenic hypersoft set.Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 22, 168-170. [39] Mahanta, J., & Panda, S. (2021). Distance measure for Pythagorean fuzzy sets with varied applications. Neural Computing and Applications, 33, 17161-17171. [40] Ejegwa, P. A. (2020). Distance and similarity measures for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Granular Computing, 5 (2), 225-238.