Published March 6, 2025
| Version v1
Conference paper
Open
ENHANCING ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY THROUGH DIFFERENTIATED APPROACHES IN HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION
Authors/Creators
- 1. PhD student, «Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers», National Research University, Uzbekistan
Description
Academic and professional success depend on the ability to communicate
effectively in English, but traditional high school education frequently falls short of
meeting the needs of a diverse student body. One promising approach is
differentiated learning, which adjusts the process, content, and evaluation to the
readiness, interests, and learning preferences of the students. This study investigates
the application of differentiated learning in English classrooms using a qualitative
methodology. The results show both advantages and disadvantages, including longer
preparation times and limited resources. Diverse assessments, adaptable lesson
planning, and sufficient teacher preparation are necessary for effective differentiation.
Resolving these issues can improve English language learners' academic performance
and level of engagement.
Files
710-716k.pdf
Files
(209.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:64d23324a7e8d45d1e3d13775dad2913
|
209.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. 1.N. N. Kondakova, E. I. Zimina, and M. Y. Prokhorova, 'A differentiated approach to teaching English for specific purposes', Tambov Univ. Rev. Ser. Humanit., no. 186, pp. 25–33, 2020, doi: 10.20310/1810-0201-2020-25-186-25- 33. 2. 2. L. Marlina, N. Dariyani, Rolipa, I. Sriyanti, Sudirman, and Meilinda, 'Differentiated learning in SMA Negeri 3 Banyuasin III', presented at the THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNOLOGY 2023 (ICSET2023), Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia, 2024, p. 020006. doi: 10.1063/5.0201822. 3. 3. T. F. Inman and J. L. Roberts, 'Effective Differentiation for Continuous Progress', in Introduction to Gifted Education, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 2022, pp. 243–265. doi: 10.4324/9781003235866-19. 4. 4. M. Chandra Handa, 'Leading Differentiated Learning for the Gifted', Roeper Rev., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 102–118, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/02783193.2019.1585213. 5. 5. A. P. Bal, 'The Effect of the Differentiated Teaching Approach in the Algebraic Learning Field on Students' Academic Achievements', Eurasian J. Educ. Res., vol. 16, no. 63, 2016. 6. 6. A. Rijal, A. Aswarliansyah, and B. Waluyo, 'Effectiveness of differentiated learning in mathematics: insights from elementary school students', J. Educ. Learn. EduLearn, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 241–248, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21806. 7. 7. C. Şaban and D. Atay, 'Differentiated Instruction in Higher Education EFL Classrooms: Instructors' Perceived Practices in a Turkish Context', Mextesol Journal, vol. 47, no. 2. Asociacion Mexicana de Maestros de Ingles MEXTESOL A.C, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85160042278&partnerID=40&md5=fb8b6e695534950ba97ee5f5d4bf2024 8. 8. A. A. Dalila, S. Rahmah, W. Liliawati, and I. Kaniawati, 'Effect of Differentiated Learning in Problem Based Learning on Cognitive Learning Outcomes of High School Students', J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2116–2122, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1839