Published June 30, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Exploring the effects of character construction and choice, outgroups and analytical method on phylogenetic inference from discrete characters in extant crocodilians

Authors/Creators

Description

Sookias, Roland B (2020): Exploring the effects of character construction and choice, outgroups and analytical method on phylogenetic inference from discrete characters in extant crocodilians. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 189 (2): 670-699, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz015, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/189/2/670/5492616

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. <a href="https://zenodo.org/account/settings/login?next=https://zenodo.org/records/14856354">Log in</a> to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:2078FFF0092D5C581C5A201C97501E74
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/2078FFF0092D5C581C5A201C97501E74

References

  • Almeida M, Bisby F. 1984. A simple method for establishing taxonomic characters from measurement data. Taxon 33: 405-409.
  • Andres B, Myers TS. 2012. Lone star pterosaurs. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 103: 383-398.
  • Asher RJ, Lehmann T. 2008. Dental eruption in afrotherian mammals. BMC Biology 6: 14.
  • Asher R, Lin K, Kardjilov N, Hautier L. 2011. Variability and constraint in the mammalian vertebral column. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 1080-1090.
  • Atchley WR, Fitch WM. 1991. Gene trees and the origins of inbred strains of mice. Science 254: 554.
  • Ballell A, Moon BC, Porro LB, Benton MJ, Rayfield EJ. 2019. Convergence and functional evolution of longirostry in crocodylomorphs. Palaeontology 62: 867-887.
  • Baron MG, Norman DB, Barrett PM. 2017. A new hypothesis of dinosaur relationships and early dinosaur evolution. Nature 543: 501-506.
  • Benson RBJ, Frigot RA, Goswami A, Andres B, Butler RJ. 2014. Competition and constraint drove Cope's rule in the evolution of giant flying reptiles. Nature Communications 5: 3567.
  • Benson RB, Hunt G, Carrano MT, Campione N. 2018. Cope's rule and the adaptive landscape of dinosaur body size evolution. Palaeontology 61: 13-48.
  • Benton M. 2007. Biodiversity through time. In: Briggs D, Crowther PR, ed. Palaeobiology II. Malden (MA): Blackwell Science Ltd, 600.
  • Benton M. 2014. Vertebrate palaeontology. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Britton A, Whitaker R, Whitaker N. 2012. Here be a dragon: exceptional size in a saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) from the Philippines. Herpetological Review 43: 541-546.
  • Brochu CA. 1997. Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. Systematic Biology 46: 479-522.
  • Brochu CA. 1999a. Phylogenetics, taxonomy, and historical biogeography of Alligatoroidea. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 9-100.
  • Brochu CA. 1999b. Taxon sampling and reverse successive weighting. Systematic Biology 48: 808-813.
  • Brochu CA. 2003. Phylogenetic approaches toward crocodylian history. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 31: 357-397.
  • Brochu CA, Storrs GW. 2012. A giant crocodile from the Plio-Pleistocene of Kenya, the phylogenetic relationships of Neogene African crocodylines, and the antiquity of Crocodylus in Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32: 587-602.
  • Bromham L. 2017. Curiously the same: swapping tools between linguistics and evolutionary biology. Biology & Philosophy 32: 855-886.
  • Brown TA. 2002. Genomes, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss.
  • Buffetaut E. 1985. The place of Gavialis and Tomistoma in Eusuchian evolution: a reconciliation of palaeontological and biochemical data. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie, Monatshefte 12: 707-716.
  • Catalano SA, Torres A. 2017. Phylogenetic inference based on landmark data in 41 empirical data sets. Zoologica Scripta 46: 1-11.
  • Catalano SA, Ercoli MD, Prevosti FJ. 2014. The more, the better: the use of multiple landmark configurations to solve the phylogenetic relationships in musteloids. Systematic Biology 64: 294-306.
  • Cedeno -Vazquez JR, Rodriguez D, Calme S, Ross JP, Densmore LD, Thorbjarnarson JB. 2008. Hybridization between Crocodylus acutus and Crocodylus moreletii in the Yucatan Peninsula: I. Evidence from mitochondrial DNA and morphology. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology 309: 661-673.
  • Collen B, Turvey ST, Waterman C, Meredith HMR, Kuhn TS, Baillie JEM, Isaac NJB. 2011. Investing in evolutionary history: implementing a phylogenetic approach for mammal conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 2611-2622.
  • Crawford NG, Parham JF, Sellas AB, Faircloth BC, Glenn TC, Papenfuss TJ, Henderson JB, Hansen MH, Simison WB. 2015. A phylogenomic analysis of turtles. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 83: 250-257.
  • Crisp MD, Cook LG. 2009. Explosive radiation or cryptic mass extinction? Interpreting signatures in molecular phylogenies. Evolution 63: 2257-2265.
  • Davis CC, Willis CG, Primack RB, Miller-Rushing AJ. 2010. The importance of phylogeny to the study of phenological response to global climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365: 3201-3213.
  • Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2005. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 361-375.
  • Edwards SV. 2009. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution 63: 1-19.
  • Erickson GM, Gignac PM, Steppan SJ, Lappin AK, Vliet KA, Brueggen JD, Inouye BD, Kledzik D, Webb GJ. 2012. Insights into the ecology and evolutionary success of crocodilians revealed through bite-force and tooth-pressure experimentation. PLoS ONE 7: e31781.
  • Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
  • Fitzsimmons NN, Buchan JC, Lam PV, Polet G, Hung TT, Thang NQ, Gratten J. 2002. Identification of purebred Crocodylus siamensis for reintroduction in Vietnam. Journal of Experimental Zoology 294: 373-381.
  • Forest F, Crandall KA, Chase MW, Faith DP. 2015. Phylogeny, extinction and conservation: embracing uncertainties in a time of urgency. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370: 20140002.
  • Frey E, Riess J, Tarsitano SF. 1989. The axial tail musculature of recent crocodiles and its phyletic implications. American Zoologist 29: 857-862.
  • Gatesy J, Amato G, Norell M, DeSalle R, Hayashi C. 2003. Combined support for wholesale taxic atavism in gavialine crocodylians. Systematic Biology 52: 403-422.
  • Gatesy J, Baker RH, Hayashi C. 2004. Inconsistencies in arguments for the supertree approach: supermatrices versus supertrees of Crocodylia. Systematic Biology 53: 342-355.
  • Garamszegi LZ. 2014. Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology: concepts and practice. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Gauthier J, Kluge AG, Rowe T. 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4: 105-209.
  • Gavryushkina A, Heath TA, Ksepka DT, Stadler T, Welch D, Drummond AJ. 2017. Bayesian total-evidence dating reveals the recent crown radiation of penguins. Systematic Biology 66: 57-73.
  • Godoy PL, Bronzati M, Eltink E, Julio CdA, Cidade GM, Langer MC, Montefeltro FC. 2016. Postcranial anatomy of Pissarrachampsa sera (Crocodyliformes, Baurusuchidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil: insights on lifestyle and phylogenetic significance. PeerJ 4: e2075.
  • Gold MEL, Brochu CA, Norell MA. 2014. An expanded combined evidence approach to the Gavialis problem using geometric morphometric data from crocodylian braincases and Eustachian systems. PLoS ONE 9: e105793.
  • Goloboff PA, Catalano SA. 2016. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32: 221-238.
  • Goloboff PA, Torres A, Arias JS. 2018a. Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology. Cladistics 34: 407-437.
  • Goloboff PA, Pittman M, Pol D, Xu X. 2018b. Morphological datasets fit a common mechanism much more poorly than DNA sequences and call into question the Mkv model. Systematic Biology 68: 494-504
  • Green RE, Braun EL, Armstrong J, Earl D, Nguyen N, Hickey G, Vandewege MW, John JAS, Capella- Gutierrez S, Castoe TA. 2014. Three crocodilian genomes reveal ancestral patterns of evolution among archosaurs. Science 346: 1254449.
  • Hammer O, Harper D, Ryan P. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 9.
  • Harshman J, Huddleston CJ, Bollback JP, Parsons TJ, Braun MJ. 2003. True and false gharials: a nuclear gene phylogeny of Crocodylia. Systematic Biology 52: 386-402.
  • Hass CA, Hoffman MA, Densmore III LD, Maxson LR. 1992. Crocodilian evolution: insights from immunological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 193-201.
  • Hillis DM, Bull JJ, White ME, Badgett MR, Molineux IJ. 1992. Experimental phylogenetics: generation of a known phylogeny. Science 255: 589-592.
  • Hoyal Cuthill JF. 2015. The size of the character state space affects the occurrence and detection of homoplasy: modelling the probability of incompatibility for unordered phylogenetic characters. Journal of Theoretical Biology 366: 24-32.
  • Hoyal Cuthill JF, Braddy SJ, Donoghue PCJ. 2010. A formula for maximum possible steps in multistate characters: isolating matrix parameter effects on measures of evolutionary convergence. Cladistics 26: 98-102.
  • Hrbek T, Vasconcelos WR, Rebelo G, Farias IP. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of South American alligatorids and the caiman of Madeira River. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology 309: 588-599.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294: 2310-2314.
  • Hull DL. 2010. Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Huson DH, Bryant D. 2005. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 254-267.
  • Iijima M, Kobayashi Y. 2019. Mosaic nature in the skeleton of East Asian crocodylians fills the morphological gap between 'Tomistominae' and Gavialinae. Cladistics 35: 623-632.
  • Inger RF. 1967. The development of a phylogeny of frogs. Evolution 21: 369-384.
  • Jarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, Li C, Ho SY, Faircloth BC, Nabholz B, Howard JT. 2014. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346: 1320-1331.
  • Kluge AG, Farris JS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Biology 18: 1-32.
  • Langer MC, Ezcurra MD, Rauhut OW, Benton MJ, Knoll F, McPhee BW, Novas FE, Pol D, Brusatte SL. 2017. Untangling the dinosaur family tree. Nature 551: E1.
  • Lee MS, Yates AM. 2018. Tip-dating and homoplasy: reconciling the shallow molecular divergences of modern gharials with their long fossil record. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Natural Sciences 285: 20181071.
  • Lindsey C. 1975. Pleomerism, the widespread tendency among related fish species for vertebral number to be correlated with maximum body length. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada 32: 2453-2469.
  • Livezey BC, Zusi RL. 2007. Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 149: 1-95.
  • Lyubetsky V, Piel WH, Stadler PF. 2016. Molecular phylogenetics 2016. BioMed Research International 2016: 9029306. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC5227124/
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2017. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, v.3.2. Available at: http:// mesquiteproject.org. (accessed March 13, 2018).
  • Madsen O, Scally M, Douady CJ, Kao DJ, DeBry RW, Adkins R, Amrine HM, Stanhope MJ, de Jong WW, Springer MS. 2001. Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature 409: 610.
  • Manegold A. 2006. Two additional synapomorphies of grebes Podicipedidae and flamingos Phoenicopteridae. Acta Ornithologica 41: 79-82.
  • Mannion PD, Benson RB, Carrano MT, Tennant JP, Judd J, Butler RJ. 2015 . Climate constrains the evolutionary history and biodiversity of crocodylians. Nature Communications 6: 8438.
  • Markwick PJ. 1998. Crocodilian diversity in space and time: the role of climate in paleoecology and its implication for understanding K/T extinctions. Paleobiology 24: 470-497.
  • Mayr G. 2004. Morphological evidence for sister group relationship between flamingos (Aves: Phoenicopteridae) and grebes (Podicipedidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140: 157-169.
  • Mayr G, Clarke J. 2003. The deep divergences of neornithine birds: a phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters. Cladistics 19: 527-553.
  • McAliley LR, Willis RE, Ray DA, White PS, Brochu CA, Densmore III LD. 2006 . Are crocodiles really monophyletic?-Evidence for subdivisions from sequence and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 16-32.
  • McCurry MR, Evans AR, Fitzgerald EM, Adams JW, Clausen PD, McHenry CR. 2017. The remarkable convergence of skull shape in crocodilians and toothed whales. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20162348.
  • Metzker ML. 2010. Sequencing technologies -the next generation. Nature Reviews Genetics 11: 31.
  • Mickevich M, Johnson MS. 1976. Congruence between morphological and allozyme data in evolutionary inference and character evolution. Systematic Zoology 25: 260-270.
  • Milian-Garcia Y, Ramos-Targarona R, Perez-Fleitas E, Sosa-Rodriguez G, Guerra-Manchena L, Alonso- Tabet M, Espinosa-Lopez G, Russello M. 2015. Genetic evidence of hybridization between the critically endangered Cuban crocodile and the American crocodile: implications for population history and in situ/ex situ conservation. Heredity 114: 272.
  • Morris ZS, Vliet KA, Abzhanov A, Pierce SE. 2019. Heterochronic shifts and conserved embryonic shape underlie crocodylian craniofacial disparity and convergence. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286: 20182389.
  • Mounce RC, Sansom R, Wills MA. 2016. Sampling diverse characters improves phylogenies: craniodental and postcranial characters of vertebrates often imply different trees. Evolution 70: 666-686.
  • Muller J, Scheyer TM, Head JJ, Barrett PM, Werneburg I, Ericson PG, Pol D, Sanchez-Villagra MR. 2010. Homeotic effects, somitogenesis and the evolution of vertebral numbers in recent and fossil amniotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 2118-2123.
  • Narvaez I, Brochu CA, Escaso F, Perez-Garcia A, Ortega F. 2015. New crocodyliforms from southwestern Europe and definition of a diverse clade of European Late Cretaceous basal eusuchians. PLoS ONE 10: e0140679.
  • Nee S, Mooers AO, Harvey PH. 1992. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89: 8322-8326.
  • O'leary MA , Bloch JI , Flynn JJ , Gaudin TJ , Giallombardo A, Giannini NP, Goldberg SL, Kraatz BP, Luo Z-X, Meng J. 2013. The placental mammal ancestor and the post -K-Pg radiation of placentals. Science 339: 662-667.
  • O'Malley MA, Koonin EV. 2011. How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after The Origin? Biology Direct 6: 32.
  • O'Reilly JE, Puttick MN, Parry L, Tanner AR, Tarver JE, Fleming J, Pisani D, Donoghue PC. 2016. Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data. Biology Letters 12: 20160081.
  • O'Reilly JE, Puttick MN, Pisani D, Donoghue PC. 2018. Probabilistic methods surpass parsimony when assessing clade support in phylogenetic analyses of discrete morphological data. Palaeontology 61: 105-118.
  • Oaks JR. 2011. A time- calibrated species tree of Crocodylia reveals a recent radiation of the true crocodiles. Evolution 65: 3285-3297.
  • Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289-290.
  • Parrish JM. 1987. The origin of crocodilian locomotion. Paleobiology 13: 396-414.
  • Patterson NJ, Moorjani P, Luo Y, Mallick S, Rohland N, Zhan Y, Genschoreck T, Webster T, Reich D. 2012. Ancient admixture in human history. Genetics 192: 1065-1093.
  • Piras P, Colangelo P, Adams DC, Buscalioni A, Cubo J, Kotsakis T, Meloro C, Raia P. 2010. The Gavialis -Tomistoma debate: the contribution of skull ontogenetic allometry and growth trajectories to the study of crocodylian relationships. Evolution & development 12: 568-579.
  • Pomidor BJ, Makedonska J, Slice DE. 2016. A landmarkfree method for three-dimensional shape analysis. PLoS ONE 11: e0150368.
  • Prum RO, Berv JS, Dornburg A, Field DJ, Townsend JP, Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR. 2015. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526: 569.
  • Puttick MN, O'Reilly JE, Pisani D, Donoghue PC. 2018. Probabilistic methods outperform parsimony in the phylogenetic analysis of data simulated without a probabilistic model. Palaeontology 62: 1-17.
  • Pyron RA, Burbrink FT, Wiens JJ. 2013. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13: 93.
  • Pyron RA. 2015. Post-molecular systematics and the future of phylogenetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30: 384-389.
  • R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rasnitsyn A. 2006. Ontology of evolution and methodology of taxonomy. Paleontological Journal 40: S679-S737.
  • Reich D, Thangaraj K, Patterson N, Price AL, Singh L. 2009. Reconstructing Indian population history. Nature 461: 489.
  • Rodriguez D,Cedeno -Vazquez JR,Forstner MR,Densmore III LD. 2008. Hybridization between Crocodylus acutus and Crocodylus moreletii in the Yucatan Peninsula: II. Evidence from microsatellites. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology 309: 674-686.
  • Ross C, Garnett S. 1989. Crocodiles and alligators. New York: Facts on File Inc.
  • Ruta M, Pisani D, Lloyd GT, Benton MJ. 2007. A supertree of Temnospondyli: cladogenetic patterns in the most speciesrich group of early tetrapods. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 274: 3087-3095.
  • Sadleir RW, Makovicky PJ. 2008. Cranial shape and correlated characters in crocodilian evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 1578-1596.
  • Sansom RS, Wills MA, Williams T. 2017. Dental data perform relatively poorly in reconstructing mammal phylogenies: morphological partitions evaluated with molecular benchmarks. Systematic Biology 66: 813-822.
  • Sansom RS, Choate PG, Keating JN, Randle E. 2018. Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees. Biology Letters 14: 20180263.
  • Schliep KP. 2011. Phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27: 592.
  • Scotland RW, Olmstead RG, Bennett JR. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology. Systematic Biology 52: 539-548.
  • Sereno PC, Arcucci A. 1990. The monophyly of crurotarsal archosaurs and the origin of bird and crocodile ankle joints. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie, Abhandlungen 180: 21-52.
  • Simmons MP, Reeves A, Davis JI. 2004. Character state space versus rate of evolution in phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 20: 191-204.
  • Slater GJ, Goldbogen JA, Pyenson ND. 2017. Independent evolution of baleen whale gigantism linked to Plio-Pleistocene ocean dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Natural Sciences 284: 20170546.
  • Sookias RB, Benson RB, Butler RJ. 2012a. Biology, not environment, drives major patterns in maximum tetrapod body size through time. Biology Letters 8: 674-677.
  • Sookias RB, Butler RJ, Benson RB. 2012b. Rise of dinosaurs reveals major body-size transitions are driven by passive processes of trait evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 279: 2180-2187.
  • Stadler T. 2011. Mammalian phylogeny reveals recent diversification rate shifts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 6187-6192.
  • Stanhope MJ, Waddell VG, Madsen O, De Jong W, Hedges SB, Cleven GC, Kao D, Springer MS. 1998. Molecular evidence for multiple origins of Insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences 95: 9967-9972.
  • Suh A, Smeds L, Ellegren H. 2015. The dynamics of incomplete lineage sorting across the ancient adaptive radiation of neoavian birds. PLoS Biology 13: e1002224.
  • Suh A. 2016. The phylogenomic forest of bird trees contains a hard polytomy at the root of Neoaves. Zoologica Scripta 45: 50-62.
  • Tarsitano SF, Frey E, Riess J. 1989. The evolution of the Crocodilia: a conflict between morphological and biochemical data. American Zoologist 29: 843-856.
  • Trueman JW. 1998. Reverse successive weighting. Systematic Biology: 733-737.
  • Volkmann L, Martyn I, Moulton V, Spillner A, Mooers AO. 2014. Prioritizing populations for conservation using phylogenetic networks. PLoS ONE 9: e88945.
  • Wang K, Lenstra JA, Liu L, Hu Q, Ma T, Qiu Q, Liu J. 2018. Incomplete lineage sorting rather than hybridization explains the inconsistent phylogeny of the wisent. Communications biology 1: 169.
  • Watanabe A, Slice DE. 2014. The utility of cranial ontogeny for phylogenetic inference: a case study in crocodylians using geometric morphometrics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27: 1078-1092.
  • Weaver JP , Rodriguez D , Venegas-Anaya M , Cedeno -Vazquez JR, Forstner MR, Densmore III LD. 2008. Genetic characterization of captive Cuban crocodiles (Crocodylus rhombifer) and evidence of hybridization with the American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus). Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology 309: 649-660.
  • Wiens JJ. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology 53: 653-661.
  • Wilberg EW. 2015. What's in an outgroup? The impact of outgroup choice on the phylogenetic position of Thalattosuchia (Crocodylomorpha) and the origin of Crocodyliformes. Systematic Biology 64: 621-637.
  • Wright AM, Hillis DM. 2014. Bayesian analysis using a simple likelihood model outperforms parsimony for estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data. PLoS ONE 9: e109210.
  • Xu X, Zheng X, Sullivan C, Wang X, Xing L, Wang Y, Zhang X, O'Connor JK, Zhang F, Pan Y. 2015. A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran theropod with preserved evidence of membranous wings. Nature 521: 70.
  • Yang Z, Rannala B. 2012. Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice. Nature Reviews Genetics 13: 303.
  • Yonezawa T, Segawa T, Mori H, Campos PF, Hongoh Y, Endo H, Akiyoshi A, Kohno N, Nishida S, Wu J. 2017. Phylogenomics and morphology of extinct paleognaths reveal the origin and evolution of the ratites. Current Biology 27: 68-77.
  • Zou Z, Zhang J. 2016. Morphological and molecular convergences in mammalian phylogenetics. Nature Communications 7: 12758.