Published January 16, 2025 | Version v1

Figure 6 from: Musker SD, Nürk NM, Pirie MD (2025) Maximising informativeness for target capture-based phylogenomics in Erica (Ericaceae). PhytoKeys 251: 87-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.251.136373

  • 1. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa|University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
  • 2. University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
  • 3. The University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Description

Figure 6 Tanglegram comparing the phylogenies inferred by concatenation (IQ-TREE; Left) and by ASTRAL (Right) using the Erica285 target superset, which excludes putative paralogs and genes with excessive missing data. For the concatenation tree, branch lengths are in substitutions per site and node labels are SH-alrt/UFBoot percentages. For the ASTRAL tree, branch lengths represent coalescent units (except for terminal branches which are are arbitrarily set to 1 as they are not estimated by ASTRAL) and node labels show posterior probability support. Nodes with full support are unlabelled. The trees are fully bifurcating and are rooted along the branch between the Erica and non-Erica samples arbitrarily for display purposes.

Files

big_1221478.jpg

Files (316.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f14cc191038c6e5c197e971e626f2505
316.8 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: 10.3897/phytokeys.251.136373 (DOI)
Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/14684955 (URL)