Published November 15, 2023 | Version v1

A new fossil frog (Lissamphibia: Anura) from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil and the early evolution of neobatrachians

  • 1. Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Tv. 14, CEP 05508-090, São Paulo, SP, Brazil & Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazaré 481, CEP 04263-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • 2. Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazaré 481, CEP 04263-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Description

Santos, Rodolfo Otávio, Carvalho, Alberto B., Zaher, Hussam (2023): A new fossil frog (Lissamphibia: Anura) from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil and the early evolution of neobatrachians. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad167, URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad167

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

URL
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/306819
LSID
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1482C52-566F-4D11-8DFA-D6B20E2EB8A3
LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFE92074FFFEFF9EFF8AFFBF722EED30
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFE92074FFFEFF9EFF8AFFBF722EED30

References

  • Agnolin F, Carvalho IS, Rolando AMA et al. Early Cretaceous neobatrachian frog (Anura) from Brazil sheds light on the origin of modern anurans. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 2020;101:102633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102633
  • Arai M, Dias-Brito D.The Ibate paleolake in SE Brazil: record of an exceptional late Santonian palynoflora with multiple significance (chronostratigraphy, paleoecology and paleophytogeography). Cretaceous Research 2018;84:264-85.
  • Ascarrunz E, Rage JC, Legreneur P et al. Triadobatrachus massinoti, the earliest known lissamphibian (Vertebrata: Tetrapoda) re-examined by μCT scan, and the evolution of trunk length in batrachians. Contributions to Zoology 2016;85:201-34.
  • Baez AM, Gomez RO. Dealing with homoplasy:osteology and phylogenetic relationships of the bizarre neobatrachian frog Baurubatrachus pricei from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 2018;16:279-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1477201 9.2017.1287130
  • Baez AM, Peri S. Baurubatrachus pricei, nov gen et sp, un anuro del Cretacico Superior de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 1989;61:447-58.
  • Baez AM, Moura GJB, Gomez RO. Anurans from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of northeastern Brazil: implications for the early divergence of neobatrachians. Cretaceous Research 2009;30:829-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2009.01.002
  • Baez AM, Gomez RO, Ribeiro LC et al. The diverse Cretaceous neobatrachian fauna of South America: Uberabatrachus carvalhoi, a new frog from the Maastrichtian Marilia Formation, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Gondwana Research 2012;22:1141-50. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.02.021
  • Baez AM, Muzzopappa P, Moura GJB. The earliest records of pipimorph frogs from South America (Aptian, Crato Formation, Brazil): a critical evaluation. Cretaceous Research 2021;121:104728. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104728
  • Barcelos LA,Santos RO.The lissamphibian fossil record of South America. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments 2023:103:341-405.
  • Batezelli A. Continental systems tracts of the Brazilian Cretaceous Bauru Basin and their relationship with the tectonic and climatic evolution of South America. Basin Research 2015;29:1-25. https://doi. org/10.1111/bre.12128
  • Biton R, Boistel R, Rabinovich R et al. Osteological observations on the Alytid Anura Latonia nigriventer with comments on functional morphology, biogeography, and evolutionary history. Journal of Morphology 2016;277:1131-45.
  • Bolkay SJ. Osnove uporedne osteologije anurskih batrahija sa dodatkom o porijeklu Anura i sa slikom naravnoga sistema istih. Glasnik Zemaljskog Muzeja Bosni Hercegovini 1919;31:277-353.
  • BremerKR.Branchsupportandtreestability.Cladistics1994;10:295-304.
  • Carvalho IS, Bertini RJ. Mariliasuchus: um novo Crocodylomorpha (Notosuchia) do Cretaceo da Bacia Bauru,Brasil.Geologia Colombiana 1999;24:83-105.
  • Carvalho IS, Agnolin F, Rolando MAA et al. A new genus of pipimorph frog (Anura) from the early Cretaceous Crato formation (Aptian) and the evolution of South American tongueless frogs. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 2019;92:222-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jsames.2019.03.005
  • Castro MC, Goin FJ, Ortiz-Jaureguizar E et al. A Late Cretaceous mammal from Brazil and the first radioisotopic age for the Bauru Group. Royal Society Open Science 2018;5:180482. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rsos.180482
  • De Blainville H. Prodrome d'une nouvelle distribution systematique du regne animal. Bulletin de la Societe Philomathique de Paris 1816;8:105-24.
  • Dubois A, Ohler A. The nomina Anura, Urodela, Ecaudata and Caudata, credited to 'Fischer von Waldheim, 1813', do not exist,with comments on the nomenclature of higher zoological taxa and on the authorships and dates of other amphibian nomina. Bionomina 2019;14:1-68.
  • Dumeril AMC.Zoologie Analytique& Ou Methode Naturelle de Classification des Animauo& Rendue Plus Facile a l'aide de Tableauo Synoptiques. Paris: Allais Libraire, 1805.
  • Engelkes K, Kath L, Kleinteich T et al. Ecomorphology of the pectoral girdle in anurans (Amphibia, Anura): Shape diversity and biomechanical considerations. Ecology and Evolution 2020;10:11467-87.
  • Evans SE, Groenke JR, Jones ME et al. New material of Beelzebufo, a hyperossified frog (Amphibia: Anura) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. PLoS One 2014;9:e87236. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0087236
  • Fabrezi M. El carpo de los anuros. Alytes 1992;10:1-29.
  • Fabrezi M. The anuran tarsus. Alytes 1993;11:47-63.
  • Fabrezi M, Alberch P. The carpal elements of anurans. Herpetologica 1996;52:188-204.
  • Farris JS. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 1989;5:417-9.
  • Farris JS, Albert VA, Kallersjo M et al. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 1996;12:99-124.
  • Feng YJ, Blackburn DC, Liang D et al. Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2017:114:E5864-70.
  • Fernandes LA, Coimbra AM. O Grupo Caiua (Ks): Revisao estratigrafica e contexto deposicional. Revista Brasileira de Geociencias 1994;24:164-76.
  • Fernandes LA, Coimbra AM. A Bacia Bauru (Cretaceo Superior, Brasil). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 1996;68:195-205.
  • Fernandes LA, Coimbra AM. Revisao estratigrafica da parte oriental da Bacia Bauru (Neocretaceo). Revista Brasileira de Geociencias 2000;30:717-28.
  • Fernandes LA, Ribeiro CMM. Evolution and palaeoenvironment of the Bauru Basin (upper Cretaceous, Brazil). Journal of South American Earth Sciences 2015;61:71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jsames.2014.11.007
  • Ford L, Cannatella DC. The major clades of frogs. Herpetological Monographs 1993;7:94-117.
  • Fouquet A, Leblanc K, Fabre AC et al. Comparative osteology of the fossorial frogs of the genus Synapturanus (Anura, Microhylidae) with the description of three new species from the Eastern Guiana Shield. Zoologischer Anzeiger 2021;293:46-73.
  • Frost DR. Amphibian Species of the World 6.2& an Online Reference, 2023. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/ (30 October 2023, date last accessed).
  • Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J et al. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2006;297:1-370.
  • Geroto CFC, Bertini RJ. New material of Pepesuchus (Crocodyliformes; Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Bauru Group: implications about its phylogeny and the age of the Adamantina Formation. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2019;185:312-34.
  • Gobbo-Rodrigues SR, Petri S, Bertini RJ. Ocorrencias de ostracodes na Formacao Adamantina do Grupo Bauru, Cretaceo Superior da Bacia do Parana e possibilidades de correlacao com depositos isocronos argentinos Parte I-Familia Ilyocyprididae.Acta Geologica Leopoldensia 1999;23:3-13.
  • Goloboff PA. Methods for faster parsimony analysis. Cladistics 1996;12:199-220.
  • Goloboff PA. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 1999;15:415-28.
  • Goloboff PA, Catalano SA. TNT version 15, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 2016;32:221-38.
  • Gomez RO, Turazzini GF. An overview of the ilium of anurans (Lissamphibia, Salientia), with a critical appraisal of the terminology and primary homology of main ilial features. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2016;36:e1030023.
  • Gomez RO, Turazzini GF. The fossil record and phylogeny of South American horned frogs (Anura, Ceratophryidae). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 2021;19:91-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019. 2021.1892845
  • Gomez RO, Baez AM, Muzzopappa P. A new helmeted frog (Anura: Calyptocephalellidae) from an Eocene subtropical lake in northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2011;31:50-9.
  • Haas A. Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics 2003;19:23-89.
  • Hime PM, Lemmon AR, Lemmon ECM et al. Phylogenomics reveals ancient gene tree discordance in the amphibian tree of life. Systematic Biology 2021;70:49-66.
  • Izecksohn E, Carvalho-e-Silva SPD, Deiss I. O osteocranio de Proceratophrysboiei (Wied-Neuwied), P. appendiculata (Gunther), P. melanopogon (Miranda-Ribeiro) e P. laticeps Izecksohn & Peixoto (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 2005:22:225-9.
  • Jaekel O. Uber die Klassen der Tetrapoden. Zoologischer Anzeiger 1909;34:193-212.
  • Jetz W, Pyron RA. The interplay of past diversification and evolutionary isolation with present imperilment across the amphibian tree of life. Nature ecology & evolution 2018;2:850-8.
  • Kaplan M. Evaluation and redefinition of the states of anuran pectoral girdle architecture. Herpetologica 2004:60:84-97.
  • Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Biology 1969;18:1-32.
  • Laloy F, Rage JC, Evans SE et al. A re-interpretation of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus based on microCT examination of a 'mummified'specimen. PLoS One 2013:8(9):e74874.
  • Laurenti JN. Specimen Medicum& Eohibens Synopin Reptilium Emendatam Cum Eoperimentis Circa Venena et Antidota Reptilium Austriacorum. Vienna: Trattner, 1768.
  • Leal MEC, Brito PM.. Anura do Cretaceo Inferior da Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. In: Gallo V, Brito PM, Silva HMA, Figueiredo FJ (eds), Paleontologia de Vertebrados: Grandes Temas e Contribucoes Cientificas. Interciencia: Rio de Janeiro, 2006, 145-52.
  • Lemierre A, Blackburn DC. A new genus and species of frog from the Kem Kem (Morocco), the second neobatrachian from Cretaceous Africa. PeerJ 2022;10:e13699.
  • Lemierre A, Folie A, Bailon S et al. From toad to frog, a CT-based reconsideration of Bufo servatus, an Eocene anuran mummy from Quercy (France). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2021;41:e1989694.
  • Lima MR, Mezzalira S, Dino R et al. Descoberta de microflora em sedimentos do Grupo Bauru, Cretaceo do Estado de Sao Paulo. Revista do Instituto Geologico 1986;7:5-9.
  • Lynch JD. Evolutionary relationships, osteology and zoogeography of leptodactyloid frogs. Miscellaneous Publication& Museum of Natural History& University of Kansas 1971;53:1-238.
  • Lynch JD. A new species of Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) from western Colombia with cranial co-ossification. Copeia 1992;1992:826-31.
  • Maisey JG. Santana Fossils: An Illustrated Atlas. Neptune: TFH Publications, 1991.
  • Manzig PC, Kellner AW, Weinschutz LC et al. Discovery of a rare pterosaur bone bed in a Cretaceous desert with insights on ontogeny and behavior of flying reptiles. PLoS One 2014;9:e100005. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100005
  • Martinelli AG, Teixeira VP. The late Cretaceous vertebrate record from the Bauru group in the Triangulo Mineiro, southeastern Brazil. Boletin Geologico y Minero 2015;126:129-58.
  • Menegazzo MC, Catuneanu O, Chang HK. The South American retroarc foreland system: the development of the Bauru Basin in the backbulge province. Marine and Petroleum Geology 2016;73:131-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.02.027
  • Moura PHA, Costa FR, Anelli LE et al. A new genus of fossil frog (Anura) from lower Cretaceous deposits in South America. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 2021;93:e20191560.
  • Muzzopappa P, Iori FV, Muniz FP et al. A new species of Baurubatrachus (Anura, Neobatrachia) from the Late Cretaceous Adamantina Formation of Brazil furnishes evidence on the diversity of this bizarre genus. Ameghiniana 2022;59:297-316.
  • Myers CW, Paolillo OA, Daly JW. Discovery of a defensively malodorous and nocturnal frog in the family Dendrobatidae: phylogenetic significance of a new genus and species from the Venezuelan Andes. American Museum Novitates 1991;3002:1-33.
  • Nicoli L, Muzzopappa P, Faivovich J. The taxonomic placement of the Miocene Patagonian frog Wawelia gerholdi (Amphibia: Anura). Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology 2016;40:153-60.
  • Nixon KC. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 1999;15:407-14.
  • Paluh DJ, Stanley EL, Blackburn DC. Evolution of hyperossification expands skull diversity in frogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2020;117:8554-62.
  • Peloso PL, Faivovich J, Grant T et al. An extraordinary new species of Melanophryniscus (Anura, Bufonidae) from southeastern Brazil. American Museum Novitates 2012;3762:1-32.
  • Pol D, Nascimento PM, Carvalho AB et al. A new notosuchian from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil and the phylogeny of advanced notosuchians. PLoS One 2014;9:e93105.
  • Pyron RA, Wiens JJ. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2011;61:543-83.
  • Rage JC, Rocek Z. A new species of Naumastosaurus (Amphibia: Anura) from the Eocene of Europe. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2007;27:329-36.
  • Reig OA. Proposiciones para una nueva macrosistematica de los anuros (nota preliminar). Physis 1958;21:109-18.
  • Rocek Z. Cranial anatomy of frogs of the family Pelobatidae Stannius, 1856, with outlines of their phylogeny and systematics. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Biologica 1981;1980:1-164.
  • Rocek Z. Larval development and evolutionary origin of the anuran skull. In: Heatwole H, Davies M (eds), Amphibian Biology 5. Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty and Sons, 2003, 1878-995.
  • Rocek Z, Jarosova J. The incrassatio frontoparietalis in frogs, its origin and phylogenetic significance. Amphibia-Reptilia 1982;3:111-24.
  • Roelants K, Gower DJ, Wilkinson M et al. Global patterns of diversification in the history of modern amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007;104:887-92.
  • de Sa RO, Trueb L. Osteology, skeletal development, and chondrocranial structure of Hamptophryne boliviana (Anura: Microhylidae). Journal of Morphology 1991;209:311-30.
  • Sanchiz B. Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology. Part 4. Salientia. Munchen: Pfeil, 1998.
  • Scott E. A phylogeny of ranid frogs (Anura: Ranoidea: Ranidae), based on a simultaneous analysis of morphological and molecular data. Cladistics 2005:21:507-74.
  • Seibert EA, Lillywhite HB, Wassersug RJ. Cranial coossification in frogs: relationship to rate of evaporative water loss. Physiological Zoology 1974;47:261-5.
  • Sheil CA. Osteology and skeletal development of Pyoicephalus adspersus (Anura: Ranidae: Raninae). Journal of Morphology 1999;240:49-75.
  • Silva MLD, Batezelli A, Ladeira FSB. Micromorphology of Paleosols of the Marilia formation and their significance in the paleoenvironmental evolution of the Bauru Basin, Upper Cretaceous, southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo 2017;41:1-20. https://doi. org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20160287
  • Soares PC, Landim PMB, Fulfaro VJ et al. Ensaio de caracterizacao estratigrafica do Cretaceo no Estado de Sao Paulo: Grupo Bauru. Revista Brasileira de Geociencias 1980;10:177-85.
  • Soares MVT, Basilici G, Marinho TS et al. Sedimentology of a distributive fluvial system: the Serra da Galga Formation, a new lithostratigraphic unit (Upper Cretaceous, Bauru Basin, Brazil). Geological Journal 2021;56:951-75.
  • Streicher JW, Miller EC, Guerrero PC et al. Evaluating methods for phylogenomic analyses, and a new phylogeny for a major frog clade (Hyloidea) based on 2214 loci. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2018;119:128-43.
  • Suazo Lara F, Gomez RO. In the shadow of dinosaurs: Late Cretaceous frogs are distinct components of a widespread tetrapod assemblage across ArgentineanandChileanPatagonia.CretaceousResearch2022;131:105085.
  • Trueb L. Bones, frogs and evolution.In: Vial JL (ed.), Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans. Contemporary Research on Major Problems. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1973, 65-132.
  • Trueb L. Patterns in cranial diversity among the Lissamphibia. In: Hanken J, Hall BK (eds), Ne Vertebrate Skull: Paterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity, Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993, 255-343.
  • Turazzini GF, Gomez RO. Comparative osteology of paradoxical frogs (Hylidae: Pseudae) with comments on diagnostic features, evolutionary trends and potential aquatic adaptations. Zoologischer Anzeiger 2023;303:47-70.
  • Venczel M, Szentesi Z, Gardner JD. New material of the frog Hungarobatrachus szukacsi Szentesi & Venczel, 2010, from the Santonian of Hungary, supports its neobatrachian affinities and reveals a Gondwanan influence on the European Late Cretaceous anuran fauna. Geodiversitas 2021;43:187-207.
  • Zaher H, Pol D, Carvalho AB et al. Redescription of the cranial morphology of Mariliasuchus amarali, and its phylogenetic affinities (Crocodyliformes, Notosuchia). American Museum Novitates 2006;3512:1-40.