Published July 28, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Impaired myocardial work efficiency in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

  • 1. Department of Traslational Medical Sciences, Unit of Cardiology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy; Unit of Cardiology and Intensive Coronary Care, "Umberto I" Hospital, Nocera Inferiore, Italy
  • 2. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
  • 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • 4. Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • 5. Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • 6. Department of Cardiology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
  • 7. Department of Traslational Medical Sciences, Unit of Cardiology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy

Description

Abstract Aims Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a growing public health problem. Impairment in left ventricular (LV) diastolic function has been proposed as a key pathophysiologic determinant. However, the role of concomitant systolic dysfunction despite preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF) has not been well characterized. To analyse LV myocardial deformation, diastolic function, and contractile reserve (CR) in patients with HFpEF at rest and while during exercise, as well as their correlation with functional capacity. Methods and results Standard echo, lung ultrasound, LV 2D speckle-tracking strain, and myocardial work efficiency (MWE) were performed at rest and during exercise in 230 patients with HFpEF (female sex 61.2%; 71.3 ± 5.3 years) in 150 age- and sex-comparable healthy controls. LV mass index and LAVI were significantly increased in HFpEF. Conversely, global longitudinal strain (GLS) and MWE were consequently reduced in HFpEF patients. During effort, HFpEF showed reduced exercise time, capacity, and VO2 peak. Increase in LVEF and LV GLS was significantly lower in HFpEF patients, while LV E/e′ ratio, pulmonary pressures, and B-lines by lung ultrasound rose. A multivariable analysis outlined that LV MWE at rest was closely related to maximal Watts reached (beta coefficient: 0.43; P < 0.001), peak VO2 (beta: 0.50; P < 0.001), LV E/e′ (beta: 0.52, P < 0.001), and number of B-lines during effort (beta: −0.36; P < 0.01). Conclusions The lower resting values of LV GLS and MWE in HFpEF patients suggest an early subclinical myocardial damage, which seems to be closely associated with lower exercise capacity, greater pulmonary congestion, and blunted LV contractile reserve during effort.

Files

fulltext.pdf

Files (822.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2cc9328b206df644961389fc08034047
822.8 kB Preview Download