CIVIL & ARCHITECTURE DOMAIN
Published November 11, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Advancements in Geopolymers: Characteristics, Durability, and Applications in Masonry Units and Bricks

Description

Geopolymers have emerged as a sustainable alternative to conventional cement-based materials, offering superior mechanical properties and environmental benefits. This review explores the characteristics, durability, and applications of geopolymers, emphasizing the use of low-calcium fly ash, metakaolin, and GGBFS as binders. Studies highlight the influence of curing temperature, sodium hydroxide concentration, and binder ratios on the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Notably, curing at temperatures between 60°C and 90°C significantly enhances strength. Research also shows that geopolymers exhibit reduced drying shrinkage and enhanced resistance to chemical attacks, including chloride and sulfate exposure, compared to traditional concrete. Additionally, geopolymer-based masonry units demonstrate improved compressive strength and lower water absorption, making them suitable for various construction applications. The use of alternative aggregates such as M-sand further improves the performance of geopolymer mixtures. This review aims to synthesize recent findings, identifying optimal material compositions and production techniques that enhance the performance of geopolymer-based materials for sustainable construction.

Files

(28-33)Advancements in Geopolymers Characteristics, Durability, and Applications.pdf

Files (209.8 kB)

Additional details

References

  • 1. Hardjito, D., & Rangan, B. V. (2005). Development and properties of low calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Research Report GC2.2.
  • 2. Provis, J. L. (2014). Geopolymers and other alkali activated materials: Why, how and what? Materials and Structures, 47, 1125. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0211-5
  • 3. Gouny, F., Fouchal, F., Pop, O., Maillard, P., & Rossignol, S. (2013). Mechanical behavior of an assembly of wood–geopolymer–earth bricks. Construction and Building Materials, 38, 110-118.
  • 4. Arellano-Aguilar, R., Burciaga-Díaz, O., Gorokhovsky, A., & Escalante-García, J. I. (2014). Geopolymer mortars based on a low grade metakaolin: Effects of the chemical composition, temperature and aggregate: binder ratio. Construction and Building Materials, 64, 642-648.
  • 5. Wallah, S. E. (2009). Drying shrinkage of heat cured fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Journal of Modern Applied Science, 3(12).
  • 6. Al Bakri, M. M., Mohammed, H., Kamarudin, H., Khairul Niza, I., & Zarina, Y. (2011). Review on fly ash based geopolymer concrete without Portland cement. Journal of Engineering Technology and Research, 3(1), 14.
  • 7. Lloyd, N. A., & Rangan, B. V. (2010). Geopolymer concrete: A review of development and opportunities. In Conference of Our World in Concrete and Structures, Singapore.
  • 8. Mondal, P. (2014). Properties of geopolymer composites with manufactured sand and recycled aggregates (M. Tech thesis). Vishveshwaraya Technological University.
  • 9. Kupwade-Patil, K., & Allouche, E. N. (2013). Impact of alkali silica reaction on fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25(1), 131-139.
  • 10. Reddy, D. V., Edouard, J. B., & Sobhan, K. (2013). Durability of fly ash based geopolymer structural concrete in marine environment. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25(6), 781-787.