Published December 31, 2020
| Version v1
Figure
Open
Fig. 2 in Phylogenetic relationships and sectional delineation within Gentiana (Gentianaceae)
Authors/Creators
- 1. James S. Pringle, & Ekaterina Kozuharova, & Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany & James S. Pringle, & Ekaterina Kozuharova, & LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- 2. Jacqueline Heckenhauer, & Royal Botanical Gardens, P.O. Box 399, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L & H
- 3. Qingbo Gao, & Medical University of Sofia, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacognosy, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
- 4. Emily Moriarty Lemmon, & Chinese Academy of Sciences, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Xining 810001, People's Republic of China
- 5. Alan R. Lemmon, & Hang Sun, & Florida State University, Dirac Science Library, Department of Scientific Computing, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4102, U.S.A. & Jiqing Road, Luolong District, Luoyang 471934, People's Republic of China & Alan R. Lemmon, & Hang Sun, & Florida State University, 89 Chieftan Way, Department of Biological Science, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, U.S.A.
- 6. Natalia Tkach, & N & Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650204, Yunnan, Peoples Republic of China
- 7. Sebastian Gebauer, & Shan-Shan Sun & Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Botany, Department of Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Neuwerk 21, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany
- 8. & Peng-Cheng Fu & Luoyang Normal University, College of Life Science,
Description
Fig. 2. Simplified phylogenetic trees of 254 nuclear anchored loci, plastid genomes and ITS region (rDNA cistron) produced via anchored hybrid enrichment. The upper two phylograms are based upon anchored loci either with tips collapsed according to the sectional delineation presented in this study (left), or with tips collapsed according to the sectional delineation by Ho & Liu (2001, right). Colour coding corresponds to Fig. 1. All nodes are fully supported (BI: 1.00 PP, ML: 100% BS) unless otherwise stated. Arrows in blue (anchored loci) and red (ITS region) show incongruences in phylogenetic relationships among sections, in comparison to the plastid phylogeny. Asterisks indicate nodes that are not supported by any analysis. Corresponding phylograms without collapsed tips are available for the rDNA cistron and the plastid phylogenies as supplementary Fig. S1 and S2.
Notes
Published as part of Favre, Adrien, Pringle, James S., Heckenhauer, Jacqueline, Kozuharova, Ekaterina, Gao, Qingbo, Lemmon, Emily Moriarty, Lemmon, Alan R., Sun, Hang, Tkach, Natalia, Gebauer, Sebastian, Sun, Shan-Shan & Fu, Peng-Cheng, 2020, Phylogenetic relationships and sectional delineation within Gentiana (Gentianaceae), pp. 1221-1238 in TAXON 69 (6) on page 1226, DOI: 10.1002/tax.12405, http://zenodo.org/record/14047337
Files
figure.png
Files
(494.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:8f09e132eb2e4ef69979e6a3e3285308
|
494.3 kB | Preview Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Related works
- Is part of
- Journal article: 10.1002/tax.12405 (DOI)
- Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:6D5FFFC1CF17670DFFEDFF919201F960 (LSID)
- Journal article: http://publication.plazi.org/id/6D5FFFC1CF17670DFFEDFF919201F960 (URL)
- Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/14047337 (URL)