Published October 25, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

NEW DISCOVERIES IN SCIENCE WITH THE APPLICATION OF 3 D TECHNOLOGIES, PERSPECTIVES OF MODERN PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGI

  • 1. Nakhchivan State University

Description

In the article, the analysis of the perspectives of the application of 3D technologies in the teaching of biology, the work done in this direction and the achieved achievements are discussed. Since the use of technologies in the field of education is already considered a priority, the changes occurring in the fields of biology and medicine are also brought to attention. The article mainly emphasizes the need to realize that scientific knowledge alone cannot take us far enough to compete in our rapidly evolving world. The solution to these problems is not only the responsibility of educators, but also depends on a collective effort that requires a synergy between the evolving global education reforms and the dynamic application of ever-changing educational technologies. The article also shows that traditional teaching approaches, such as lectures, visual aids and multimedia presentations, are no longer sufficient considering the experimental nature of biology. The work claims that many scientific hypotheses that were once considered proven today are losing their relevance due to the continuous application of advanced 
technologies. The idea that this dynamic evolution in scientific understanding will result in the creation of new scientific and professional fields in the near future is brought to the attention of educators.

Files

Annali d’Italia №60 2024-52-54.pdf

Files (535.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e1ce39228d365ed3a2e24c24d47e33a0
535.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Babayeva Z. (2023). STEAM-21st century education. Teaching materials, "Ajami" Publishing and Printing Union, Nakhchivan 2023, p. 312 2. Babayeva Z. (2023). Biology teaching methodology. Textbook, "Ajami" Publishing-Polygraphy Union, Nakhchivan 2023, p. 224 3. Babayeva Z. (2023). Determınatıon of teachıng strategıes consıdered necessary ın teachıng bıology. Dergi Park Akademik. Tübitak -Ulakbim. International Journal of Educational Spectrum. Turkey, 2023, volume 5, number 2, p.51-67 https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3734/article/1273211 /author/files 4. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/articlefile/3044384 5. Babayeva Z. (2024). Use of the concept of dıgıtal educatıon and 3D technologıes ın the organızatıon of modern bıology lessons. The Scientific Heritage (Budapest, Hungary), No 135 (135) (2024), p. 24-26 6. Babayeva, Z. 2023. https://aem.az/index.php?newsid=3461 7. Babayeva Z. (2024)ş Application of new methods in biology education, interactive learning and its mechanisms. German International Journal of Modern Science. №78 2024, 54-57 8. Babayeva Z. (2024). Use of technology skılls ın the educatıon system and development of dıgıtal skılls. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research (İJMCER), Volume 6, Issue 2, pages 224-228, 2024 9. Babayeva Z. (2023). Perspectıves of usıng 3D technologıes ın teachıng bıology. Revista Universidad y Sociedad/Universidad @cienfuegos/ VOS – Havana, Kuba, 2023; https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/4155 10. ACDC. Análisis Competencias Digitales Comunes; Santiago Campión, R., Saenz de Jubera, M., Martín, D., Chocarro, E., Eds.; Available online: https://es.surveymonkey.com/r/acdcv2 (accessed on 4 February 2021). 11. Tourón, J.; Martín, D.; ASENCIO, N.; Pradas, S.; Íñigo, V. Construct validation of a questionnaire to measure teachers' digital competence (TDC). Rev. Española Pedagog. 2018, 76, 25–54. 12. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2006/962/EC) 18 de diciembre. Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. 2006. Available online: https: //bit.ly/3n5ext6 (accessed on 14 April 2020). 13. Brynjolfsson, E.; McAfee, A. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies; Norton y Company: New York, NY, USA, 2014. 14. Vuorikari, R.; Punie, Y.; Carretero, S.; Van den Brande, G. «DigComp» 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model; Luxembourg Publication Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2016. Available online: https://bit.ly/21320Fl (accessed on 4 February 2021). 15. Ferrari, A.; Punie, Y.; Redecker, C. Understanding Digital Competence in the 21st Century: An Analysis of Current Frameworks. In 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills. EC-TEL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 7563. [CrossRef] https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642- 33263-0_7 16. Redecker, C. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu; Punie, Y., Ed.; Joint Research Centre; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2017. 17. M. Claro et al. Teaching in a Digital Environment (TIDE): Defining and measuring teachers' capacity to develop students' digital information and communication skills. Computers and Education (2018) 18. Digital technology use, technological self-efficacy, and subjective well-being among North Korean migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: Moderated moderation, 2023, Digital Health 19. The Policy of Inclusion of Digital Technologies in the Chilean School System. A Systematic Review 2023, Pensamiento Educativo 20. The term well-being in Technology-Enhanced Learning: A systematic literature review 2022, SIIE 2022 - 24th International Symposium on Computers in Education 21. Risks in Adolescent Adjustment by Internet Exposure: Evidence From PISA, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology 22. Mediation of Problematic Use in the Relationship Between Types of Internet Use and Subjective Well-Being in Schoolchildren 2021, Frontiers in Psychology 23. In other words, higher digital development could open up opportunities for the subjective and social well-being of its students (Cabello et al., 2020), or reproduce inequalities already existing in schools, or that originate from them (Helsper, 2017; Helsper & van Deursen, 2017; Helsper, van Deursen, & Eynon, 2015; Livingstone et al., 2017)