Published October 23, 2024 | Version v1

Quantifying the use of natural history collections

  • 1. Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands
  • 2. Catalogue of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Description

Measuring the use of natural history collections is essential to understand their past and present impact on science, to underpin decisions about their management and to assist with deploying them optimally to address societal challenges. Using the vast natural history collections of Naturalis Biodiversity Center as an example, this paper assesses the significance and relevance of quantifying collection use. Four aspects are discussed: 1. standardisation, 2. relevance of having standardised metrics on collection use, 3. the level of detail and completeness of the information and 4. the interactions between digitisation of collections and physical collection use. Based on a set of transparent and objective parameters to describe collection use, it is proposed to further develop these into international standards.

Files

BDJ_article_130811.pdf

Files (552.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0f2b2ef5e3d9326dfb95c2bca76d0fec
552.8 kB Preview Download

System files (110.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c408b5c373025837944dedeeec5be024
110.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Bakker F, Antonelli A, Clarke J, Cook J, Edwards S, Ericson PP, Faurby S, Ferrand N, Gelang M, Gillespie R, Irestedt M, Lundin K, Larsson E, Matos-Maraví P, Müller J, von Proschwitz T, Roderick G, Schliep A, Wahlberg N, Wiedenhoeft J, Källersjö M (2020) The Global Museum: natural history collections and the future of evolutionary science and public education. PeerJ 8 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8225
  • Brongersma LD (1978) Rijksmuseum van Geologie en Mineralogie 1878-1978: Past, Present, and Future. Scripta Geologica 48: 37‑96.
  • Davis J (2021) Digitising the entire Museum collection could contribute over £2 billion to the global economy. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/news/2021/october/digitising-museum-collection-could-contribute-over-2-billion.html. Accessed on: 2022-10-10.
  • Deloitte Access Economics (2021) Cost benefit analysis of a mission to discover and document Australia's species. https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/cost-benefit-analysis-mission-discover-document-australia-species.html. Accessed on: 2022-10-15.
  • Erkens RH, Baas P (2008) Utrecht: rise and fall of a great herbarium. Taxon 57 (3): 1024‑1026.
  • Gassó-Miracle E, Monquil-Broersen T (Eds) (2020) Van onschatbare waarde: 200 jaar Naturalis. [Priceless: 200 years Naturalis.]. Walburg Pers B.V., Uitgeverij, Zutphen, 352 pp.
  • Gijzen A (1938) 's Rijks Museum van Natuurlijke Historie 1820-1915. [The National Museum of Natural History]. W.L. & J. Brusse's Uitgeversmaatschappij NV, Rotterdam, 333 pp.
  • Hardy H, Livermore L, Kersey P, Norris K, Smith V (2023) Understanding the users and uses of UK Natural History Collections. Research Ideas and Outcomes 9 https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e113378
  • Heberling JM, Miller J, Noesgaard D, Weingart S, Schigel D (2021) Data integration enables global biodiversity synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (6). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018093118
  • Hobern D, Paul DL, Robertson T, Groom Q, Thiers B, Asase A, Luo M, Semal P, Woodburn M, Zschuschen E (2020) Advancing the Catalogue of the World's Natural History Collections. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 4 https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.59324
  • Holthuis LB (1995) 1820-1958: Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie. [1820-1958: National Museum of Natural History.]. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Leiden, 172 pp.
  • Johnson K, Owens IP, Global Collection Group (2023) A global approach for natural history museum collections. Science 379 (6638): 1192‑1194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf6434
  • Lannom L, Koureas D, Hardisty A (2020) FAIR data and services in biodiversity science and geoscience. Data Intelligence 2: 122‑130. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00034
  • Meineke E, Davies TJ, Daru B, Davis C (2018) Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 374 (1763). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0386
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2020) Biological collections: Ensuring critical research and education for the 21st Century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 244 pp. [ISBN 978-0-309-49856-2; 978-0-309-49853-1] https://doi.org/10.17226/25592
  • Popov D, Roychoudhury P, Hardy H, Livermore L, Norris K (2021) The value of digitising natural history collections. Research Ideas and Outcomes 7 https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e78844
  • Raes N, Casino A, Goodson H, Islam S, Koureas D, Schiller E, Schulman L, Tilley L, Robertson T (2020) White paper on the alignment and interoperability between the Distributed System of Scientific Collections (DiSSCo) and EU infrastructures - The case of the European Environment Agency (EEA). Research Ideas and Outcomes 6 URL: https://riojournal.com/article/62361
  • Reitsma E (2012) Duizend en meer verhalen op sterk water. Stichting Uitgeverij Noord-Holland, Wormer, 320 pp. [ISBN 978 90 78381 556]
  • Schilthuizen M, Vonk F (2020) Wie wat bewaart: Twee eeuwen Nederlandse natuurhistorie. [Preserving collections: Two centuries of Dutch natural history]. Spectrum Uitgeverij, Amsterdam, 352 pp.
  • Tilley L, Woodburn M, Vincent S, Casino A, Addink W, Berger F, Bogaerts A, De Smedt S, French L, Islam S, Mergen P, Nivart A, Papp B, Petersen M, Santos C, Schiller E, Semal P, Smith V, Wiltschke K (2024) Systematic Design of a Natural Sciences Collections Digitisation Dashboard. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10 https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e118244