Published September 25, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Exploring in-service training programs for teacher development in the Philippines

  • 1. Department of Education, Philippines

Description

This study examines how in-service training affects teachers' professional growth and job performance. Data were collected from 40 teachers with over five years of experience using open-ended questionnaires. The analysis identified several challenges and opportunities related to in-service training. Key issues include inadequate planning and preparation of training programs, limited availability of resources and technological support, and low levels of teacher participation. These challenges hinder the effectiveness and sustainability of professional development initiatives. Despite these issues, teachers acknowledged the potential benefits of in-service training. They reported that such training could enhance their pedagogical skills, update their knowledge, and increase their motivation. The study highlights the importance of refining the planning and execution of training programs to better align with teachers' needs and improve outcomes. Addressing these challenges is crucial for maximizing the benefits of on-going professional development. The research emphasizes the need for strategic improvements to overcome barriers and ensure that training programs effectively support teachers' growth. By contributing valuable insights into the on-going discourse on teacher training, this study underscores the importance of continuous enhancement in training quality and relevance. While there have been advancements in teacher training, significant challenges remain that must be addressed to fully realize the potential of professional development efforts.

Files

IRJSTEM-V4N3-2024-P04.pdf

Files (355.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:49c8b49813e046c54cfcde3151e2d376
355.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Balagtas, J. (2020). Effective strategies in in-service training for Filipino teachers. Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 45-59.
  • Chappelle, M., & Lee, A. (2021). Innovative strategies in teacher professional development. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 34(2), 115-130.
  • Deped Order 42 s 2017. (2017). www.deped.gov.ph.
  • Elwarraki, O., Aammou, S., & Lahiassi, J. (2023). Teachers as Facilitators: Exploring the Role of Educators in Personalized Learning Environments in Moroccan Schools. Conhecimento & Diversidade, 15(39), 146-155.
  • Garcia, R. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in teacher training programs. Philippine Education Review, 12(4), 134-145.
  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 382-391.
  • Mantilla, E. J., Hungo, M., & Casinillo, L. (2024, May 21). School-based In-Service Training (INSET) Management for Personal and Professional Development of Public School Principals and Teachers.
  • Mendoza, L. (2020). Addressing diverse needs in professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 89-101.
  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and development). (2019). Trends shaping education.
  • Ovens, P. (2000). Reflective teacher development in primary science. London: Falmer press.
  • Pasique, D. A. (2023). Challenges and opportunities among educators in the implementation of continuing professional development. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research IJFMR, 5(04)
  • Santos, M., & Salazar, T. (2020). Enhancing in-service training through leadership support. Journal of Educational Management, 18(3), 55-68.
  • Shuttleworth, J. (2021). Professional development for educators: Trends and challenges. Journal of Educational Advancement, 19(1), 22-36.