Published September 24, 2024 | Version v1

Centering accessibility, increasing capacity, and fostering innovation in the development of international eDNA standards

Description

Environmental DNA (eDNA) includes a set of rapidly emerging technologies that have the potential to support environmental monitoring and biodiversity conservation through novel, non-invasive, cost-effective and democratic methods and tools. Meanwhile, eDNA researchers are developing international standards for eDNA technologies, methods and data outputs. For eDNA technologies to be accessible, useful and appropriate, we must ensure that any standards developed include a broad conception of users from around the world, a diversity of ecological contexts and locations and, most importantly, a realistic outlook on research capacities and infrastructure. In this article, we assemble perspectives on international standardisation of eDNA from a diverse and global group of users and experts from Africa, South America and the Pacific Islands. The authors of this article collaborated by answering and discussing a set of open-ended questions aimed at eliciting hopes, concerns and experiences regarding eDNA standards. The result is a set of emergent themes and a generative consensus to highlight the need for the creation of adaptable standards, the development of regional capacity, increased sensitising to data sovereignty and the viewing of standardisation as a global capacity-building activity.

Files

MBMG_article_126058.pdf

Files (548.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0f75ece5f3862171f5ebca0020d3890e
548.8 kB Preview Download

System files (135.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ae424087a6e4e16587462c639fb1512c
135.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Abbott C, Coulson M, Gagné N, Lacoursière-Roussel A, Parent GJ, Bajno R, Dietrich C, May-McNally S (2021) Guidance on the use of targeted environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis for the management of aquatic invasive species and species at risk. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Science Advisory Secretariat. Ottawa, ON. http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/
  • Abbott C, Bright D, Bryant H, Côté G, Crookes S, Gurney K, Hanner R, Helbing C, Hocking M, Khan I, Langlois VS, Lemay M, Marshall N, Miliano R, Mirabzadeh-Ardakani A, Parent G, Richter C, Wagener A, Wilson C, Clogg-Wright K (2023) Performance criteria for the analyses of environmental DNA by targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction. National standard of Canada, CSA W219:23. Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ávila-Arcos MC, de la Fuente Castro C, Nieves-Colón MA, Raghavan M (2022) Recommendations for sustainable ancient DNA research in the Global South: Voices from a new generation of paleogenomicists. Frontiers in Genetics 13: 880170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.880170
  • Bani A, De Brauwer M, Creer S, Dumbrell AJ, Limmon G, Jompa J, von der Heyden S, Berger M (2020) Chapter Ten: informing marine spatial planning decisions with environmental DNA. Advances in Ecological Research 62. Elsevier, New York, 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.02.011
  • Beng KC, Corlett RT (2020) Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: Opportunities, challenges and prospects. Biodiversity and Conservation 29(7): 2089–2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01980-0
  • Borie M, Hulme M (2015) Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between mother earth and ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy 54: 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.009
  • Bowen G (2006) Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(3): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500304
  • Bruce K, Blackman R, Bourlat SJ, Hellström AM, Bakker J, Bista I, Bohmann K, Bouchez A, Brys R, Clark K, Elbrecht V, Fazi S, Fonseca V, Hänfling B, Leese F, Mächler E, Mahon AR, Meissner K, Panksep K, Pawlowski J, Schmidt Yáñez P, Seymour M, Thalinger B, Valentini A, Woodcock P, Traugott M, Vasselon V, Deiner K (2021) A practical guide to DNA-based methods for biodiversity assessment. Advanced Books. https://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e68634
  • Carroll SR, Garba I, Figueroa-Rodríguez OL, Holbrook J, Lovett R, Materechera S, Parsons M, Raseroka K, Rodrigues-Lonebear D, Rowe R, Sara R, Walker JD, Anderson J, Hudson M (2020) The CARE Principles for indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal 19(43): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
  • Charmaz K (2005) Grounded theory in the 21st Century: a qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In: NK Denzin, Lincoln YS (Eds) Handbook of qualitative research 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 507–536.
  • Clarke A (2005) Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Collins H (2009) We cannot live by scepticism alone. Nature 458(7234): 30–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/458030a
  • De Brauwer M, Deagle B, Dunstan P, Berry O (2023) Integrating environmental DNA science into Australia's marine parks: a roadmap. CSIRO, Hobart, Australia. https://www.csiro.au/en/research/natural-environment/biodiversity/edna-roadmap
  • Deiner K, Bik HM, Mächler E, Seymour M, Lacoursière-Roussel A, Altermatt F, Creer S, Bista I, Lodge DM, de Vere N, Pfrender ME, Bernatchez L (2017) Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Molecular Ecology 26(21): 5872–5895. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14350
  • Doorenspleet K, Jansen L, Oosterbroek S, Bos O, Kamermans P, Janse M, Wurz E, Murk A, Nijland R (2021) High resolution species detection: accurate long read eDNA metabarcoding of North Sea fish using Oxford Nanopore sequencing. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.163828284.40261296/v1
  • Ebenezer TE, Muigai AWT, Nouala S, Badaoui B, Blaxter M, Buddie AG, Jarvis ED, Korlach J, Kuja JO, Lewin HA, Majewska R, Mapholi N, Maslamoney S, Mbo'o-Tchouawou M, Osuji JO, Seehausen O, Shorinola O, Tiambo CK, Mulder N, Ziyomo C, Djikeng A (2022) Africa: Sequence 100,000 species to safeguard biodiversity. Nature 603(7901): 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00712-4
  • Edwards PN (2013) A vast machine: computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  • Egeter B, Veríssimo J, Lopes‐Lima M, Chaves C, Pinto J, Riccardi N, Beja P, Fonseca NA (2022) Speeding up the detection of invasive bivalve species using environmental DNA: A Nanopore and Illumina sequencing comparison. Molecular Ecology Resources 22(6): 2232–2247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13610
  • Gagné N, Bernatchez L, Bright D, Côté G, Coulson M, Gurney K et al. (2021) Environmental DNA (eDNA) reporting requirements and terminology (p. 31). National standard of Canada. CSA W214: 21. [Canadian Standards Association.]
  • Handsley-Davis M, Kowal E, Russell L, Weyrich LS (2021) Researchers using environmental DNA must engage ethically with Indigenous communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5(2): 146–148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01351-6
  • Haraway D (1991) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: Haraway D (Ed.) Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York, NY.
  • Helbing CC, Hobbs J (2019) Environmental DNA standardization needs for fish and wildlife population assessments and monitoring. CSA Group, Canada. https://www.csagroup.org/wp-contet/uploads/CSA-Group-Research-Environmental-DNA.pdf
  • International Organization for Standardization [ISO] (2019) ISO Publication on: Good Standardization Practices. https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/store/en/PUB100440.pdf
  • Kelly RP, Port JA, Yamahara KM, Martone RG, Lowell N, Thomsen PF, Mach ME, Bennett M, Prahler E, Caldwell MR, Crowder LB (2014) Harnessing DNA to improve environmental management. Science 344(6191): 1455–1456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251156
  • Kelly RP, Lodge DM, Lee KN, Theroux S, Sepulveda AJ, Scholin CA, Craine JM, Andruszkiewicz-Allan E, Nichols KM, Parsons KM, Goodwin KD, Gold Z, Chavez FP, Noble RT, Abbott CL, Baerwald MR, Naaum AM, Thielen PM, Simons AL, Jerde CL, Duda JJ, Hunter ME, Hagan JA, Meyer RS, Steele JA, Stoeckle MY, Bik HM, Meyer CP, Stein E, James KE, Thomas AC, Demir-Hilton E, Timmers MA, Griffth JF, Weise MJ, Weisberg SB (2023) Toward a national eDNA strategy for the United States. Environmental DNA 6(1): e432. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.432
  • Lee KN, Kelly RP, Demir-Hilton E, Laschever E, Allan EA (2023) Adoption of environmental DNA in public agency practice. Environmental DNA 6(1): e470 [1–14]. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.470
  • Ortmann AC, Goodwin KD, Bolhuis H, Groben R, Makhalanyane T, Bowman J, Robinson S, Thompson F (2023) Catalyzing progress in the blue economy through joint marine microbiome research across the Atlantic. Frontiers in Marine Science 10: 1327719. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1327719
  • Pedersen MW, Overballe-Petersen S-S, Ermini L, Der Sarkissian C, Haile J, Hellstrom M, Spens J, Thomsen PF, Bohmann K, Cappellini E, Schnell IBB, Wales NA, Caroe C, Campos PF, Schmidt AMZ, Gilbert MTP, Hansen AJ, Orlando L, Willerslev E, Carøe C, Campos F, Schmidt AMZ, Gilbert MTP, Hansen AJ, Orlando L, Willerslev E (2014) Ancient and modern environmental DNA. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 370(1660): 20130383–20130383. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0383
  • Perry I, Jâms IB, Casas-Mulet R, Hasmutoko J, Marchbank A, Lendelvo S, Naomab E, Mapani B, Creer S, Wanke H, Durance I, Kille P (2022) Challenges to implementing environmental-DNA monitoring in Namibia. Frontiers in Environmental Science 9: 773991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.773991
  • Ribes D (2014) Ethnography of scaling. Or, how to fit a national research infrastructure in the room. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531624
  • Salazar VW, Cavalcante JVF, de Oliveira D, Thompson F, Mattoso M (2021) BioProv–a provenance library for bioinformatics workflows. Journal of Open Source Software 6(67): 3622. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03622
  • Schenekar T (2023) The current state of eDNA research in freshwater ecosystems: Are we shifting from the developmental phase to standard application in biomonitoring? Hydrobiologia 850(6): 1263–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04891-z
  • Sharaf A, Ndiribe CC, Omotoriogun TC, Abueg L, Badaoui B, Badiane Markey FJ, Beedessee G, Diouf D, Duru VC, Ebuzome C, Eziuzor SC, Jaufeerally Fakim Y, Formenti G, Ghanmi N, Guerfali FZ, Houaga I, Ideozu JE, Katee SM, Khayi S, Kuja JO, Kwon-Ndung EH, Marks RA, Moila AM, Mungloo-Dilmohamud Z, Muzemil S, Nigussie H, Osuji JO, Ras V, Tchiechoua YH, Zoclanclounon YAB, Tolley KA, Ziyomo C, Mapholi N, Muigai AWT, Djikeng A, Ebenezer TGE (2023) Bridging the gap in African biodiversity genomics and bioinformatics. Nature Biotechnology 41(9): 1348–1354. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01933-2
  • Sharaf A, Nesengani LT, Hayah I et al. (2024) Establish grassroots genomics and bioinformatics programs to train 400 Africans yearly. African BioGenome Project (AfricaBP). Open Institute for Genomics and Bionformatics paper.
  • Shea MM, Kuppermann J, Rogers MP, Smith DS, Edwards P, Boehm AB (2023) Systematic review of marine environmental DNA metabarcoding studies: Toward best practices for data usability and accessibility. PeerJ 11: e14993. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14993
  • Shen EW, Vandenberg JM, Moore A (2023) Sensing inequity: Technological solutionism, biodiversity conservation, and environmental DNA. Biosocieties 19: 501–525. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-023-00315-w
  • Star SL, Ruhleder K (1994) Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, Chapel Hill, NC, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/192844.193021
  • Taberlet P, Bonin A, Zinger L, Coissac E (2018) Environmental DNA: for biodiversity research and monitoring. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767220.001.0001
  • The eDNA Society (2019) Environmental DNA Sampling and Experiment Manual Version 2.1). Published April 25, 2019. https://ednasociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/eDNA_manual_Eng_v2_1_3b.pdf
  • Thompson C, Bacha L, Paz PHC, Oliveira MAP, Oliviera BCV, Omachi C, Chueke C, Hilário ML, Lima M, Leomil L, Felix-Coreiro T, da Cruz TLC, Otsuki K, Vidal L, Thompson M, Silva RRE, Cabezas CMV, Veríssimo BM, Zaganelli JL, Botelho ACN, Teixeira L, Cosenza C, Costa PM, Landuci F, Tschoeke DA, Silva TA, Attias M, de Souza W, de Rezende CE, Thompson F (2023) Collapse of scallop Nodipecten nodosus production in the tropical Southeast Brazil as a possible consequence of global warming and water pollution. The Science of the Total Environment 904: 166873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166873
  • Thompson C, Ortmann AC, Makhalanyane T, Thompson F (2024) Leveraging marine biotechnology for an All-Atlantic sustainable blue economy. Trends in Biotechnology 42(8): 939–941. [Jan 17: S0167-7799(23)00367-0]
  • Thomsen PF, Willerslev E (2015) Environmental DNA – An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biological Conservation 183: 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019
  • Trujillo-González A, Villacorta-Rath C, White NE, Furlan EM, Sykes M, Grossel G, Divi UK, Gleeson D (2023) Considerations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes. Environmental DNA.
  • Tydecks L, Jeschke JM, Wolf M, Singer G, Tochner K (2018) Spatial and topical imbalances in biodiversity research. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0199327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199327
  • Valentini A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Civade R, Herder J, Thomsen PF, Bellemain E, Besnard A, Coissac E, Boyer F, Gaboriaud C, Jean J, Poulet N, Roset N, Copp FH, Geniez P, Pont D, Argillier C, Baudoin J-M, Peroux T, Crivelli AJ, Olivier A, Acqueberge M, Le Brun M, Møller PR, Willerslev E, Dejean T (2016) Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology 25(4): 929–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13428
  • von der Heyden S (2022) Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunities. Environmental DNA 5(1): 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.363
  • Weigand A, Zimmermann J, Bouchez A, Leese F (2017) DNAqua-Net: Advancing Methods, Connecting Communities and Envisaging Standards. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 1: e20310. https://doi.org/10.3897/tdwgproceedings.1.20310
  • Whitmore L, McCauley M, Farrell JA, Stammnitz MR, Koda SA, Mashkour N, Summers V, Osborne T, Whilde J, Duffy DJ (2023) Inadvertent human genomic bycatch and intentional capture raise beneficial applications and ethical concerns with environmental DNA. Nature Ecology & Evolution 7(6): 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02056-2
  • Wilson-Wilde L (2018) The international development of forensic science standards-A review. Forensic Science International 288: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.009