Care Literacy for Culture, Nature, and Future
Authors/Creators
- 1. Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
- 2. Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
- 3. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 153-8904, Japan
- 4. Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0032, Japan
- 5. INSEAD Business School, Fontainebleau, 77300, France
Description
Within the broader sustainability agenda, an important element relates to the need for a transformative approach to nature. This motivates and is reflected in the Natures Futures Framework. Within this framework, this letter focuses on the relational value of Nature as Culture/One with Nature. This is important yet complex as part of the re-orienting of values to enable truly significant change, and which necessitates individual and community involvement on the value of caring for nature. As a means for understanding and enabling individuals' potential to engage and contribute, the notion of 'care for nature literacy' is put forward.
Files
openreseurope-4-19261.pdf
Additional details
References
- (null). United Nations.
- (null). Stockholm Resilience Centre.
- Pereira LM, Davies KK, den Belder E (2020). Developing multiscale and integrative nature–people scenarios using the Nature Futures Framework. People Nat. doi:10.1002/pan3.10146
- (null). IPBES.
- Costantini H, Nihei M, Ueno T (2021). 'Care literacy' in super aging Japan [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. Open Res Eur. doi:10.12688/openreseurope.13853.1
- Carrithers M (2012). Nature and culture.
- Shaffer MS, Young PSK (2015). Chapter 1. The nature- culture paradox. doi:10.9783/9780812291452-001
- Laspidou C (2023). The numbers game of nature in cities [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. Open Res Europe. doi:10.12688/openreseurope.16344.1
- Mansur AV, McDonald RI, Güneralp B (2022). Nature futures for the urban century: integrating multiple values into urban management. Environ Sci Policy. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.013
- Kim H, Peterson GD, Cheung WWL (2023). Towards a better future for biodiversity and people: Modelling Nature Futures. Glob Environ Change. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102681
- Cairney P, Timonina I, Stephan H (2023). How can policy and policymaking foster climate justice? A qualitative systematic review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Open Res Eur. doi:10.12688/openreseurope.15719.2
- Pascual U, Balvanera P, Christie M (2023). Editorial overview: leveraging the multiple values of nature for transformative change to just and sustainable futures — insights from the IPBES values assessment. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101359
- Jax K, Calestani M, Chan KM (2018). Caring for nature matters: a relational approach for understanding nature's contributions to human well-being. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009
- Taghikhah F, Voinov A, Shukla N (2019). Extending the supply chain to address sustainability. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.051
- Nutbeam D (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. doi:10.1093/heapro/15.3.259
- Barrette M, Boyer W, Naylor PJ (2022). Defining a nature-based literacy: a research synthesis review of health-promoting literacies to promote nature engagement. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn. doi:10.1080/14729679.2022.2067201