Published September 13, 2024 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Helicoma oleifera Y. R. Xiong, Manawas. & K. D. Hyde 2024, sp. nov.

  • 1. Innovative Institute for Plant Health, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, Guangdong, China & School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
  • 2. School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand & Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
  • 3. School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand & CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming, China
  • 4. Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan 655011, China
  • 5. School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
  • 6. Innovative Institute for Plant Health, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, Guangdong, China
  • 7. Office of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

Description

Helicoma oleifera Y. R. Xiong, Manawas. & K. D. Hyde sp. nov.

Fig. 2

Etymology.

Species epithet refers to the host species name “ oleifera ” from which the fungus was isolated.

Holotype.

MHZU 23-0157.

Description.

Saprobic on the rotting petiole of Elaeis oleifera. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous, helicosporous. Colonies on the substratum superficial, effuse, gregarious, brown. Mycelium composed of partly immersed, partly superficial, hyaline, septate, branched hyphae. Conidiophores 145–360 µm long, 6.5–7.5 µm wide (x ̄ = 210 × 6.5 μm, n = 20), macronematous, mononematous, cylindrical, unbranched or branched at base, straight to slightly bent, septate, deep brown at root part, brown at apex, pale brown at middle part mixing with some brown areas, smooth-walled with irregular inclusion. Conidiogenous cells 13–22 µm long, 5–7.5 µm wide (x ̄ = 17 × 6.4 μm, n = 20), monoblastic, integrated, sympodial, terminal, cylindrical or fertile at the apex of conidiophores, brown, smooth-walled with irregular inclusion; with denticles, 1.3–2.3 µm long, 1.4–2.5 µm wide (x ̄ = 1.6 × 1.8 μm, n = 20), arising from the apex portion of conidiophores as tooth-like and papillate protrusions, exposed or imbedded in the apex of conidiophore, mono- to polyblastic, brown, smooth-wall. Conidia 18–22.5 μm diam. (x ̄ = 20.4 μm, n = 40) and conidial filament 6.8–9 μm wide (x ̄ = 8.2 μm, n = 40), 45–55 μm long (x ̄ = 50.6 μm, n = 40), solitary, acrogenous, helicoid, rounded at tip, tapering towards flat end, conic truncate at base, tightly coiled 1 ½ times, 8 - septate, not becoming loose in water, guttulate, hyaline to pale brown, smooth-walled, the third cell shrinking and producing the root canal.

Culture characteristics.

Conidia germinating on water agar and germ tubes produced from conidia within 12 h. Colonies growing on PDA attaining 2.5 cm diam. after six weeks at 25 ° C, irregular, undulate, rough, superficial and partially immersed, brown aerial mycelium mixed with pale brown, deep brown at up and down junction area; reverse brown with pale brown.

Material examined.

China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna City, an unidentified forest beside National Highway 219 (21 ° 93 ' N, 101 ° 24 ' E, 549.6 m elev.), rotting petiole of the Elaeis oleifera, 5 February 2023, Y. R. Xiong and Li Lu, XG 198 (MHZU 23-0157, holotype); ex-type culture, ZHKUCC 24 -0121, other living cultures ZHKUCC 24-0122, ZHKUCC 24-0766, ZHKUCC 24-0767.

Notes.

Four isolates obtained in this study from the rotting petiole of the Elaeis oleifera clustered in an independent clade in the phylogenetic tree with 78 % ML, 76 % MP bootstrap support and 1.00 BIPP bootstrap support. The nucleotide differences between Helicoma oleifera and its phylogenetically related species were checked, excluding gaps: H. acropleurogenum (GZCC 22-2035) - ITS: 3.53 % (18 / 510 base pairs), LSU: 0.71 % (6 / 844 base pairs), tef 1 - α: 2.85 % (26 / 912 base pairs), rpb 2: 3.92 % (41 / 1045 base pairs); H. dennisii (NBRC 30667) - ITS: 4.36 % (25 / 573 base pairs), LSU: 0.35 % (2 / 564 base pairs), tef 1 - α and rpb 2 sequence unavailable; H. hydei (MFLUCC 18-1270) - ITS: 3.50 % (26 / 744 base pairs), LSU: 0.71 % (6 / 847 base pairs), tef 1 - α: 2.74 % (25 / 912 base pairs), rpb 2 sequence is unavailable; H. inthanonense (MFLUCC 11-0003) - ITS: 4.56 % (26 / 570 base pairs), LSU: 1.63 % (14 / 860 base pairs), tef 1 - α and rpb 2 sequence is unavailable. Helicoma oleifera is different from related species not only in the size of conidia and conidiophores (Table 3), but also in conidia, which shrink and produce the tubular structure at the third cell (Fig. 2 q, r, s), while other species do not produce any deformation. In addition, H. acropleurogenum (Lu et al. 2023) has intercalary and mostly monoblastic, rarely polyblastic conidiogenous cells; however, H. oleifera has terminal and monoblastic or polyblastic conidiogenous cells. Helicoma dennisii (Tsui et al. 2006) has intercalary and polyblastic conidiogenous cells and fertile denticle structure at several cells on the upper end of the conidiophore. However, H. oleifera only has fertile denticle structures at the apex cell of the conidiophore. Furthermore, H. oleifera differs from H. hydei (Liu et al. 2019) by having an embedded denticle structure, while H. hydei (Liu et al. 2019) has an exposed denticle structure. Furthermore, H. inthanonense (Boonmee et al. 2011) has acropleurogenous and brown conidia with 7 - septate and produces an asexual morph from MEA culture, while H. oleifera has acrogenous and hyaline to pale brown conidia with 8 - septate. Therefore, we introduce H. oleifera as a new species.

Notes

Published as part of Xiong, Yinru, Hyde, Kevin D., Lu, Li, Harishchandra, Dulanjalee L., Mapook, Ausana, Xu, Biao, Alotibi, Fatimah & Manawasinghe, Ishara S., 2024, Novel Helicoma and Neohelicosporium (Tubeufiaceae, Tubeufiales) species and two new host records of Helicoma on tropical palms (Arecaceae) from China, pp. 287-315 in MycoKeys 108 on pages 287-315, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.108.128889

Files

Files (5.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:05d1f804575f47739a9947d0f0d8bbe6
5.5 kB Download

System files (47.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b34ae748a75931332b9e2ac519a58574
47.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
MHZU, ZHKUCC
Material sample ID
MHZU 23-0157, ZHKUCC 24, ZHKUCC 24-0122, ZHKUCC 24-0766, ZHKUCC 24-0767
Event date
2023-02-05
Verbatim event date
2023-02-05
Scientific name authorship
Y. R. Xiong, Manawas. & K. D. Hyde
Kingdom
Fungi
Phylum
Ascomycota
Order
Tubeufiales
Family
Tubeufiaceae
Genus
Helicoma
Species
oleifera
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Type status
holotype
Taxonomic concept label
Helicoma oleifera Xiong & Hyde, 2024

References

  • Lu YZ, Ma J, Xiao XJ, Zhang LJ, Ma XY, Xiao YP, Kang JC (2023) Two novel species and one new record of Helicoma from tropical China. Mycosystema 42 (1): 263–277.
  • Tsui CK, Sivichai S, Berbee ML (2006) Molecular systematics of Helicoma, Helicomyces and Helicosporium and their teleomorphs inferred from rDNA sequences. Mycologia 98 (1): 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832715
  • Liu NG, Lu YZ, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EHC, Lumyong S, Jumpathong J, Liu JK (2019) Kevinhydea brevistipitata gen. et sp. nov. and Helicoma hydei sp. nov., (Tubeufiaceae) from decaying wood habitats. Mycological Progress 18 (5): 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-019-01480-8
  • Boonmee S, Zhang Y, Chomnunti P, Chukeatirote E, Tsui CKM, Bahkali AH, Hyde KD (2011) Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae based on morphological reexamination and phylogenetic analysis. Fungal Diversity 51 (1): 63–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-011-0147-4
  • Zhao GZ, Liu X, Wu W (2007) Helicosporous hyphomycetes from China. Fungal Diversity 26: 313–524.
  • Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EHC, Jones EBG, Phookamsak R, Ariyawansa HA, Boonmee S, Zhao Q, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abdel-Wahab MA, Banmai S, Chomnunti P, Cui BK, Daranagama DA, Das K, Dayarathne MC, de Silva NI, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Ekanayaka AH, Gibertoni TB, Góes-Neto A, Huang SK, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Konta S, Lee HB, Li WJ, Lin CG, Liu JK, Lu YZ, Luo ZL, Manawasinghe IS, Manimohan P, Mapook A, Niskanen T, Norphanphoun C, Papizadeh M, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Richter C, et al. ((2016) Fungal diversity notes 367–490: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 80: 1–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0373-x
  • Lu YZ, Liu JK, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Kang JC, Fan C, Boonmee S, Bhat DJ, Luo ZL, Lin CG, Eungwanichayapant PD (2018 b) A taxonomic reassessment of Tubeufiales based on multi-locus phylogeny and morphology. Fungal Diversity 92 (1): 131–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0411-y
  • Lu YZ, Boonmee S, Liu JK, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, Eungwanichayapant PD, Kang JC (2018 a) Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses reveals Neohelicosporium gen. nov. and five new species of helicosporous hyphomycetes from aquatic habitats. Mycological Progress 17 (5): 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-017-1366-1
  • Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Lu YZ (2017) Neohelicosporium fusisporum sp. nov. (Tubeufiaceae) and a first record of a sexual morph within Neohelicosporium. Studies in Fungi 2 (1): 210–217. https://doi.org/10.5943/sif/2/1/24