Published July 21, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Chaetoceros affinis Lauder 1864

  • 1. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Rooseveltov trg 6, HR- 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
  • 2. Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Department of Integrative Marine Ecology, Villa Comunale, 80121 Naples, Italy

Description

Chaetoceros affinis Lauder (1864a: 78) (Figs 42–53).

References:— Hustedt (1930), Cupp (1943), Evensen & Hasle (1975), Rines & Hargraves (1988), Hernández-Becerril (1996), Jensen & Moestrup (1998), Berard-Therriault et al. (1999), Shevchenko et al. (2006), Sunesen et al. (2008), Kooistra et al. (2010), Ishii et al. (2011), Lee et al. (2014a).

Synonyms:Chaetoceros javanicus Cleve, Chaetoceros ralfsii Cleve, Chaetoceros schüttii Cleve, Chaetoceros angulatus Schütt, Chaetoceros distichus Schütt, Chaetoceros procerus Schütt, Chaetoceros paradoxus var. schüttii Schütt, Chaetoceros clevei Peragallo, Chaetoceros raflsii Karsten, Chaetoceros schüttii var. genuina Meunier, Chaetoceros najadianus Schussnig, Chaetoceros adriaticus Schussnig.

Morphometry: —a.a.: 9–42 μm; p.a.: 8–16 μm.

LM: —The cells are united in straight chains (Fig. 42). Each cell contains a single large chloroplast. The valve surface is concave and the valve corners are sharp and slightly drawn up. Intercalary setae are thin, originating from the valve apices and immediately cross each other at the chain margin. Apertures are rather narrow but usually distinct in LM, slit-shaped to elliptical. Setae are very straight and positioned in the apical plane. Terminal setae can be similar or can differ very strongly from the intercalary ones, in both orientation and morphology. When different, they are much thicker and taper towards the end, strongly diverging in a broad V- (not shown) or U-shaped (Fig. 42) curve towards the end of the chain, lying in the apical plane. The resting spores have unevenly vaulted valves with a broad distinct mantle. Primary valve is dome-shaped, ornamented with numerous long spines whereas the secondary valve has a central inflated part and it is ornamented with few longer spines (Fig. 50).

EM: —Valve mantle is high and often with a visible constriction near the margin (Fig. 43). The aperture is very often completely occluded by a thin silica wall with no distinct pattern, except for the single row of pores on its edge where it fuses with the marginal ridge (Fig. 43). The smooth silica membrane is very fragile and appears ruptured in some of the observed specimens. The valves have a pattern of dichotomously branching costae radiating from a round central annulus and are perforated with numerous irregularly shaped very small poroids (Fig. 44). The marginal ridge is ornamented with a hyaline rim (Fig. 45). Terminal valves possess a central slit-shaped rimoportula that forms an external process shaped as a wide, short, flattened tube (Fig. 46). Terminal valves are generally ornamented with few short capilli covering the valve face in the central part (Fig. 45). Intercalary setae are circular in cross-section (Fig. 47) and ornamented with small poroids and shark fin-shaped spines arranged in a spiral pattern (Fig. 48). Terminal setae are heavily silicified with stronger spines and few larger elongated pores irregularly distributed along the seta length (Fig. 49). The surface of the resting spores is covered with knobs and spines, which can be simple or have dichotomously branching tips (Figs 51, 52). The mantle of the secondary valve possesses one single row of puncta (Figs 51, 53).

Distinctive features: —Narrow apertures, completely occluded by a silica membrane observable in EM.Intercalary setae straight, all setae lying in the apical plane. Terminal setae often thicker. Resting spores with numerous long spines.

Notes

Published as part of Bosak, Sunčica & Sarno, Diana, 2017, The planktonic diatom genus Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta) from the Adriatic Sea, pp. 1-44 in Phytotaxa 314 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.314.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/13700770

Files

Files (4.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:76c73c2e91bb5beacd7800647b81636e
4.1 kB Download

System files (44.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:91e7e9f66cb7a2aec3617a4a391bc0b3
44.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Lauder
Kingdom
Chromista
Phylum
Ochrophyta
Order
Chaetocerotales
Family
Chaetocerotaceae
Genus
Chaetoceros
Species
affinis
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Chaetoceros affinis Lauder, 1864 sec. Bosak & Sarno, 2017

References

  • Lauder, H. S. (1864 a) On new diatoms. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 4: 6 - 8. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 2818.1864. tb 01620. x
  • Hustedt, F. (1930) Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Osterrreichs und der Schweiz under Berucksichtigung der ubrigen Lander Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. 1. Teil. Akademische Verlaggesellschaft, Leipzig, 920 pp.
  • Cupp, E. E. (1943) Marine plankton diatoms of the west coast of north America. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Technical series 5: 1 - 237.
  • Evensen, D. L. & Hasle, G. R. (1975) The morphology of some Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) species as seen in electron microscope. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 53: 153 - 184.
  • Rines, J. E. B. & Hargraves, P. E. (1988) The Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyceae) Flora of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, U. S. A. Bibliotheca Phycologica, Band 79, J. Cramer, Berlin, 196 pp.
  • Hernandez-Becerril, D. U. (1996) A morphological study of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyta) from the plankton of the Pacific Ocean of Mexico. Bullettin of the Natural History Museum of London 26: 1 - 73.
  • Jensen, K. G. & Moestrup, O. (1998) The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in innner Danish coastal waters. Opera Botanica 133: 1 - 68.
  • Berard-Therriault, L., Poulin, M. & Bosse, L. (1999) Guide d'identification du phytoplancton marin de l'estuarie et du golfe du Saint- Laurent incluant egalement certains protozoaires (Guide to the identifying marine phytoplankton of the estuary and gulf of St. Lawrence including certain protozoans). Publication speciale canadienne des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques, Ottawa, 387 pp.
  • Shevchenko, O. G., Orlova, T. Y. & Hernandez-Becerril, D. U. (2006) The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Botanica Marina 49: 236 - 258. https: // doi. org / 10.1515 / BOT. 2006.028
  • Sunesen, I., Hernandez-Becerril, D. U. & Sar, E. A. (2008) Marine diatoms from Buenos Aires coastal waters (Argentina). V. Species of the genus Chaetoceros. Revista de Biologia Marina y Oceanografia 43: 303 - 326. https: // doi. org / 10.4067 / s 0718 - 19572008000200009
  • Kooistra, W. H. C. F., Sarno, D., Hernandez-Becerril, D. U., Assmy, P., Di Prisco, C. & Montresor, M. (2010) Comparative molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses of taxa in the Chaetocerotaceae (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 5: 471 - 500. https: // doi. org / 10.2216 / 09 - 59.1
  • Ishii, K. - I., Iwataki, M., Matsuoka, K. & Imai, I. (2011) Proposal of identification criteria for resting spores of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyceae) from a temperate coastal sea. Phycologia 50: 351 - 362. https: // doi. org / 10.2216 / 10 - 36.1
  • Lee, S. D., Joo, H. M. & Lee, J. H. (2014 a) Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) based on setae ultrastructure. II. Subgenus Hyalochaete. Phycologia 53: 614 - 638. https: // doi. org / 10.2216 / 14 - 51 R 2.1