Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published December 31, 2002 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Borings formed by Late Cretaceous endobiontic foraminifers within larger benthic foraminifers

Authors/Creators

Description

Nielsen, Jan Kresten (2002): Borings formed by Late Cretaceous endobiontic foraminifers within larger benthic foraminifers. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 47 (4): 673-678, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13286031

Files

source.pdf

Files (640.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e469e1f6f3b77f7f03bf69e6cb4192b1
640.9 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:E469FFF6FFB77F7FFFBFFFE6CB41FFB1
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/E469FFF6FFB77F7FFFBFFFE6CB41FFB1

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/1850878EFFB67F7EFFD9FDBFC9AEFCF5 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/1850878EFFB67F7AFFD9FCB0CA92FE4A (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.13286033 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.13286035 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.13286037 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.13286039 (DOI)

References

  • Baumfalk, Y.A., Fortuin, A.R., and Mok, R.P. 1982. Talpinella cunicularia n. gen., n. sp., a possible foraminiferal parasite of Late Cretaceous Orbitoides. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 12: 185-196.
  • Baumfalk, Y.A. and Nijholt, K.J. 1984. Talpinella and Orbitoides: 18 million years of close relationship between two foraminiferal genera. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 14: 77-81.
  • Bromley, R.G. 1981. Concepts in ichnotaxonomy illustrated by small round holes in shells. Acta Geologica Hispanica 16: 55-64.
  • Bromley, R.G. 1994. The palaeoecology of bioerosion. In: S.K. Donovan (ed.), The Palaeobiology of Trace Fossils, 134-154. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  • Caus, E., Bernaus,J.M., and Gomez-Garrido, A. 1996.Biostratigraphic utility of species of the genus Orbitoides. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 26: 124-136.
  • Glazek, J., Marcinowski, R., and Wierzbowski, A. 1971. Lower Cenomanian trace fossils and transgressive deposits in the Cracow Upland. Acta Geologica Polonica 21: 433-448.
  • Goldring, R. and Pollard, J.E. 1996. Ichnotaxonomic revision and the importance of type material. Palaeontology Newsletter 31: 7-8.
  • Gormus,M. and Meric, E.2000.Unusual forms of orbitoidal foraminifera in the Maastrichtian of Turkey. Cretaceous Research 21: 801-812.
  • Gormus, M. and Sagular, E.K. 1998. Microboring activity in Orbitoides accumulations from Turkey.IsraeliJournalofEarth-Sciences 47: 61-67.
  • Hallock, P. and Talge, H.K. 1994. A predatory foraminifer, Floresina amphiphaga, n. sp., from the Florida Keys. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 24: 210-213.
  • Hinte, J.E.van 1966.Orbitoides from the Campanian type section.Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings, Series B 69: 79-110.
  • Hinte, J.E. van 1976. A Cretaceous time scale. American Association Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 60: 498-516.
  • International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. xxix+ 306 pp. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London.
  • Kelly, S.R.A. and Bromley, R.G. 1984. Ichnological nomenclature of clavate borings. Palaeontology 27: 793-807.
  • Martin, R.E. and Liddell, W.D. 1991. The taphonomy of Foraminifera in modern carbonate environments: implications for the formation of foraminiferal assemblages. In: S.K. Donovan (ed.), The Processes of Fossilization, 170-193. Belhaven Press, London.
  • Neumann, M. 1990. Le genre Orbitoides: analyse de donnees statistiques pour la differentiation des especes. Cahiers de Micropaleontologie Nouvelle Serie 5: 5-50.
  • Neumann, M. 1993. Le genre Orbitoides. II Revision des differentes especes. Revue de Micropaleontologie 36: 301-353.
  • Neumann, M. and Odin, G.S. 2001. Le stratotype historique du Campanien, definition, elements de correlation. In: G.S. Odin (ed.), The Campanian- Maastrichtian Stage Boundary. Characterisation at Tercis les Bains (France) and Correlation with Europe and other Continents, 677-710. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
  • Neumann, M. and Platel, J.-P. (coord.) 1983. Le Campanien stratotypique: etude lithologique et micropaleontologique. Geologie Mediterraneenne 10 (3-4): 41-57.
  • Nielsen, K.S.S. 1999. Foraminiferivory revisited: a preliminary investigation of holes in foraminifera. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 45: 139-142.
  • Nielsen, K.S.S. and Nielsen, J.K. 2001. Bioerosion in Pliocene to late Holocene tests of benthic and planktonic foraminiferans, with a revision of the ichnogenera Oichnus and Tremichnus. Ichnos 8: 99-116.
  • Palmer, T.J., Haynes, J.R., and Plewes, C.R. 1991. A boring agglutinating foraminiferan from the Oxford Clay.PalaeontologyNewsletter 12: 21.
  • Peebles, M.W. and Lewis, R.D. 1988. Differential infestation of shallow-water benthic foraminifera by microboring organisms: possible biases in preservation potential. Palaios 3: 345-351.
  • Plewes, C.R., Palmer, T.J., and Haynes, J.R. 1993. A boring foraminiferan from the Upper Jurassic of England and northern France. Journal of Micropalaeontology 12: 83-89.
  • Shroba, C.S. 1993. Taphonomic features of benthic foraminifera in a temperate setting: experimental and field observations on the role of abrasion, solution and microboring in the destruction of foraminiferal tests. Palaios 8: 250-266.
  • Sliter, W.V.1971.Predation on benthic foraminifers.JournalofForaminiferal Research 1: 20-29.
  • Taylor, P.D. 1990. Preservation of soft-bodied and other organisms by bioimmuration-A review. Palaeontology 33: 1-17.
  • Venec-Peyre, M.-T. 1996. Bioeroding foraminifera: a review. Marine Micropaleontology 28: 19-30.