Published March 6, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

The length-weight relationship and condition factors of coastal small-sized adult and juvenile fish species following dense mucilage in the Sea of Marmara, Türkiye

Description

Şen, Yusuf, Daban, İsmail Burak, Öztekin, Alkan, Ayaz, Adnan, Altinağaç, Uğur, İşmen, Ali, Yüksek, Ahsen, Özekinci, Uğur, Çakir, Fikret, Demirkiran, Tekin, Uğur, Gençtan Erman, Ayaz, Oğuzhan, Selçuk, Buminhan Burkay (2024): The length-weight relationship and condition factors of coastal small-sized adult and juvenile fish species following dense mucilage in the Sea of Marmara, Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Zoology 48 (2): 104-112, DOI: 10.55730/1300-0179.3165, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0179.3165

Files

source.pdf

Files (626.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9d8aaad28651f75d038490dd9818bd5a
626.1 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF8AFFD28651F75DFF84FFDD9818BD5A

References

  • Bagenal TB, Tesch FW (1978). Age and growth. In: Bagenal T (editors). Methods for Assessment of fish production in fresh waters. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 101-136.
  • Bok TD, Gokturk D, Kahraman AE, Alicli TZ, Acun T et al. (2011). Length-weight relationships of 34 fish species from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 10 (23): 3037-3042. https://doi.org/10.3923/ javaa.2011.3037.3042
  • Bostanci D, Coskun T (2020). A research on some biological properties of mediterranean sand smelt (Atherina hepsetus L.) population in the Sea of Marmara. Acta Aquatica Turcica 16 (2): 257-265. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.657630
  • Bradley M, Baker R, Nagelkerken I, Sheaves M (2019). Context is more important than habitat type in determining use by juvenile fish. Landscape Ecology 34: 427-442. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10980-019-00781-3
  • Compaire JC, Gomez-Cama C, Soriguer MC (2021). Lengthweight relationships of six fish species of a rocky intertidal shore on the subtropical Atlantic Coast of Spain. Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences 37 (1): 267-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020-00272-2
  • Daban IB, Ihsanoglu MA, Ismen A, Inceoglu H (2020). Length-weight relationships of 17 teleost fishes in the Marmara Sea, Turkey. Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature 23 (5): 1245-1256. https://doi. org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.682467
  • Dalyan C, Kesici NB, Yalgin F (2021). Preliminary study on cryptobenthic fish assemblages affected by the mucilage event in the northeastern Aegean Sea. Journal of the Black Sea/ Mediterranean Environment 27 (2): 202-213.
  • Daban IB, Yuksek A, Ismen A, Ayaz A, Altinagac U et al.(2022). The effect of mucilage on an early life stages of benthic and pelagic fish species of Marmara Sea. TUBITAK 1001, project no 121G097, pp. 129.
  • Demirel N, Dalkara EM (2012). Weight-length relationships of 28 fish species in the Sea of Marmara. Turkish Journal of Zoology 36 (6): 785-791. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1111-29
  • Dermanci P (2016). Determinations of the distribution and growth characteristics of Symphodus ocellatus (Linnaeus, 1758), in the shallow waters of Gokceada. Master's Thesis, University of Canakkale Onsekiz Mart, Canakkale, Turkiye.
  • Erguden SA, Altun A, Erguden D (2018). Length-weight relationship and condition of Arnoglossus kessleri Schmidt, 1915 in Iskenderun Bay (Eastern Mediterranean, Turkey). Sakarya University Journal of Science 22 (6): 1617-1622. https://doi. org/10.16984/saufenbilder.347576
  • Erturk Gurkan S, Acar S, Gurkan M, Ozdilek SY (2022). Evaluation of isotopic signature of mucilage in the benthic food web in the Canakkale Strait. Biharean Biologist 16 (1): 11-15.
  • Froese R (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight-length rela-tionships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 22: 241-253. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x
  • Goncalves JMS, Bentes L, Lino PG, Ribeiro J, Canario AV et al. (1997). Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale demersal fisheries of the south and south-west coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research 30 (3): 253-256. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(96)00569-3
  • Gurkan S, Taskavak E (2011). Seasonal condition factors of Syngnathid species caugth from Aegean Sea coasts. Ege University Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences 28 (1): 21- 24.
  • Ilhan A, Ilhan D (2018). Length-weight relationship and condition of big-scale sand smelt (Atherina boyeri Risso, 1810) from Marmara Lake (Manisa) and Homa Lagoon (Izmir). The Black Sea Journal of Sciences 8 (1): 25-34. https://doi.org/10.31466/ kfbd.403014
  • Karadurmus U, Sari M (2022). Marine mucilage in the Sea of Marmara and its effects on the marine ecosystem: mass deaths. Turkish Journal of Zoology 46 (1): 93-102. https://doi. org/10.3906/zoo-2108-14
  • Karadurmus U (2022). Length-weight relationship and condition factor of sixteen demersal fish species from the southern part of the Marmara Sea, Turkey. Journal of Ichthyology 62 (4): 543- 551. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945222040105
  • Keskin C, Gaygusuz O (2010). Length-weight relationships of fishes in shallow waters of Erdek Bay (Sea of Marmara, Turkey). European Journal of Biology 69 (2): 87-94. https://doi. org/10.1134/S0032945222040105
  • Koutrakis ET, Tsikliras AC (2003). Length-weight relationships of fishes from three northern Aegean estuarine systems (Greece). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 19 (4): 258-260.
  • McPhail JD (1969). Predation and the evolution of a stickleback (Gasterosteus). Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada 26 (12): 3183-3028. https://doi.org/10.1139/f69-301
  • Morato T, Afonso P, Lourinho P, Barreiros JP, Santos RS et al. (2001). Length-weight relationships for 21 coastal fish species of the Azores, North-eastern Atlantic. Fisheries Research 50 (3): 297- 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00215-0
  • Morey G, Moranta J, Massuti E, Grau A, Linde M et al. (2003). Weight-length relationships of littoral to lower slope fishes from the western Mediterranean. Fisheries Research 62 (1): 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(02)00250-3
  • Oztekin A, Ozekinci U, Daban IB (2016).Length-weight relationships of 26 fish species caught by longline from the Gallipoli peninsula, Turkey (Northern Aegean Sea). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 57 (4): 335-342.
  • Pauly D (1993). Fishbyte section editorial. NAGA. ICLARM Quart, 16: 26-27.
  • Petrakis G, Stergio KI (1995). Gill net selectivity for Diplodus annularis and Mullus surmuletus in Greek waters. Fisheries Research 21 (3-4): 455-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165- 7836(94)00293-6
  • Roughgarden J, Gaines S, Possingham H (1988). Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. Science 241 (4872): 1460- 1466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11538249
  • Samsun S, Saglam NE (2021). Length-weight relationships and condition factors of six fish species in the Southern Black Sea (Ordu-Turkey). Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University 38 (2): 111-116. https://doi. org/10.13002/jafag4659
  • Santos MN, Gaspar MB, Vasconcelos P, Monteiro CC (2002). Weight-length relationships for 50 selected fish species of the Algarve coast (Southern Portugal). Fisheries Research 59 (1-2): 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00401-5
  • Savun-Hekimoglu B, Gazioglu C (2021). Mucilage problem in the semi-enclosed seas: Recent outbreak in the Sea of Marmara. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 8 (4): 402-413. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.955739
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1987). Biostatistics. Francise & Co, New York, 10.
  • Sahin C, Akin S, Hacimurtazaoglu N, Mutlu C, Verep B (2008). The stock parameter of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) population on the coasts of the eastern Black Sea: reason and implications in declining of anchovy population during the 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 fishing seasons. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 17 (12b): 2159-2169.
  • Tarkan AS, Gaygusuz O, Acipinar H, Gursoy C, Ozulug M (2006). Length-weight relationship of fishes from the Marmara Region (NW-Turkey). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 22 (4): 271-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00711.x
  • Tesch FW (1971). Age and growth. In: Ricker WE (editors). Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 99-130.
  • Topcu NE, Ozturk B (2021). The impact of the massive mucilage outbreak in the Sea of Marmara on gorgonians of Prince Islands: A qualitative assessment. Journal of the Black Sea/ Mediterranean Environment 27 (2): 270-278.
  • Turner RK, Lorenzoni I, Beaumont N, Bateman IJ, Langford IH, McDonald AL (1998). Coastal management for sustainable development: analysing environmental and socio-economic changes on the UK coast. Geographical Journal 164 (3): 269- 281. https://doi.org/10.2307/3060616
  • Tufekci V, Balkis N, Beken CP, Ediger D, Mantikci M (2010). Phytoplankton composition and environmental conditions of the mucilage event in the Sea of Marmara. Turkish Journal of Biology 34 (2): 199-210. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-0812-1
  • Uckun D, Akalin S, Taskavak E, Togulga M (2004). Some biological characteristics of the garfish (Belone belone L., 1761) in Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 20: 413-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2004.00592.x
  • Ustaoglu D (2022). Morphometry and growth parameters of Symphodus roissal i (Labridae) in the Southern Black Sea. Master's Thesis, University of Ordu, Ordu, Turkiye.
  • Whitehead P, Bauchot L, Hureau J, Nielsen J, Tortonese E (1986). Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, Volume I, II, III, p. 1-1473.
  • Whitfield AK (2020). Littoral habitats as major nursery areas for fish species in estuaries: a reinforcement of the reduced predation paradigm. Marine Ecology Progress Series 649: 219-234. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13459
  • Wilhelms I (2013). Atlas of length-weight relationships of 93 fish and crustacean species from the North Sea and the North- East Atlantic (No. 12). Johann Heinrich von Thunen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, p. 552. https://doi.org/10.3220/WP_12_2013