Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published December 31, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Soil and habitat preferences of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in natural mountain landscape

Authors/Creators

Description

Skalski, Tomasz, Kędzior, Renata, Maciejowski, Wojciech, Kacprzak, Andrzej (2011): Soil and habitat preferences of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in natural mountain landscape. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 11 (2): 105-115, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13204222

Files

source.pdf

Files (2.7 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2e2102997492330dac5e8916557ec402
2.7 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:2E21FF99FF92330DAC5E8916557EC402

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.13204224 (DOI)

References

  • Bachman S., Backer W.J., Brummitt N., Dransfield J., Moad J. 2004. Elevational gradients, area and tropical island diversity: an example from the palms of New Guinea. Ecography 27: 299- 310.
  • Bienkowski P. 1990. Cellulose decomposition as bioenergetic indicator of soil degradation. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 16: 235- 244.
  • Bjorkman L., Feurdean A., Wohlfarth B. 2003. Lateglacial and Holocene forest dynamics at Steregoiu in the Gutaiului Mountains, Northwest Romania. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 124: 79-111.
  • Brady N.C., Weil R.R. 1999. The Nature and Properties of Soils, Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  • Brehm G., Colwell R.K., Kluge J. 2007. The role of environment and mid-domain effect on moth species richness along a tropical elevational gradient. Global Ecology & Biogeography 16: 205-219.
  • Bremner, J.M., 1996. Nitrogen-total. In: Sparks D.L., et al., (eds.): Method of Soil Analysis: Part 3. Chemical Methods, (Number 5) in the Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Book Ser. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 1085- 1121
  • Colwell R. K., Lees D.C. 2000. The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 70-76.
  • Colwell R.K. 2006. RangeModel. A Monte Carlo simulation tool for assessing geometric constraints on species richness. Version 5. User's Guide and application published at: http:/ /viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/rangemodel.
  • Colwell R.K., Rangel T.F. 2010. A stochastic, evolutionary model for range shifts and richness on tropical elevational gradients under Quaternary glacial cycles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 3695-3707.
  • Colwell R.K., Gotelli N.J., Rahbek C., Entsminger G.L., Farell C., Graves G.R. 2009. Peaks, plateaus, canyons, and craters: The complex geometry of simple mid-domain effect models. Evolutionary Ecology Research 11: 355- 370.
  • Dai W.H., Huang Y. 2006. Relation of soil organic matter concentration to climate and altitude in zonal soils of China. Catena 65: 87-94.
  • Drewnik M. 2006. The effect of environmental conditions on the decomposition rate of cellulose in mountain soils. Geoderma 132: 116- 130.
  • Dynesius M., Jansson R. 2000. Evolutionary consequences of changes in species' geographical distributions driven by Milankovitch climate oscillations. Proc Natl Acad. Sci. U S A. 97: 9115-20.
  • Eyre M.D., Rushton S.P., Luff M.L., Telfer, M.G 2005. Investigating the relationships between the distribution of British ground beetle species (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and temperature, precipitation and altitude. Journal of Biogeography 32: 973 - 983.
  • Fleishman E., Austin G.T., Weiss A.D. 1998. An empirical test of Rapoport's rule: elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities. Ecology 79: 2482-2493.
  • Franz, E.H., 1990. Potential influence of climatic change on soil organic matter and tropical agroforestry. In: Scharpenseel H.W., Schomaker M., Ayoub A. (eds.): Soils on a Warmer Earth: Effects of Expected Climate Change on Soil Processes, with Emphasis on the Ttropics and Sub-Tropics, Developments in Soil Science, vol. 20. Elsevier, New York, pp. 108-120.
  • Garten C.T., Post III W.M., Hanson P.J., Cooper L.W., 1999. Forest carbon inventories and dynamics along a elevation gradient in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Biogeochemistry 45: 115-145.
  • Gobbi M., Rosario B., Water A., De Bernardi F., Pelfini M., Brandmayr P. 2007. Environmental features influencing Carabid beetle (Coleoptera) assemblages along a recently deglaciated area in the Alpine region. Ecological Entomology, 32: 682-689.
  • Grytnes J. A. 2003. Species-richness patterns of vascular plants along seven altitudinal transects in Norway. Ecography 26: 291-300.
  • Hess M. 1965. Vertical climatic zones in the Polish Wester n Car path ian s. ZN UJ. Pr ace Geograficzne 33. (in Polish)
  • Hodkinson I. D. 2005. Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol. Rev. 80: 489-513.
  • Hodkinson I.D., Jackson J.K. 2005. Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as bioindicators for environmental monitoring, with particular reference to mountain ecosystems. Environmental Management 35: 649-666.
  • IUSS Working Group WRB, 2006. World reference base for soil resources. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome.
  • Jansson R. 2003. Global patterns in endemism explained by past climatic change. Proc Biol Sci. 270: 583-590.
  • Jasiewicz A. 1965. The vascular plants of the Western Bieszczady Mts. (East Carpathians) (in Polish with English summary). Monographiae Botanicae 20:1-338.
  • Keddy P. A. 1992. Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 157-164.
  • Korner C. 2000. Why are there global gradients in species richness? Mountains might hold the answer. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 513-514.
  • Lawton J.H., MacGarvin M., Heads, P. A. 1987. Effects of altitude on the abundance and species richness of insect herbivores on bracken. J. Anim. Ecol. 56: 147-160.,
  • Lawton J. H. 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84: 177-192.
  • MacArthur R.H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
  • McCoy E.D. 1990. The distribution of insects along elevational gradients. Oikos 58: 313- 332.
  • Rahbek C. 1995. The elevational gradient of species r ich n ess - a un ifor m patter n . - Ecography 18: 200-205.
  • Rahbek C. 2005. The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol. Lett. 8: 224-239.
  • Rainio J, Niemela J 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 487-506.
  • Ralska-Jasiewiczowa M., Madeyska E., Mierzenska M. 2006. Vegetational changes in the montane grassland zone of the High Bieszczady mountains (southeast Poland) during the last millennium-pollen records from deposits in hanging peat-bogs. Veget Hist Archaeobot 15: 391-401.
  • Rizun W., Pawlowski J. 1998. Preliminary investigations on the ground-beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the Czyvczyn Mts. (Ukrainian Eastern Carpathians), Roczniki Bieszczadzkie 6: 185-194. (in Polish)
  • Sanders N.J. 2002. Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport's rule. Ecography 25: 25-32.
  • Skiba S., Drewnik M., Szmuc R. 1998. Soil map of the Bieszczady National Park, In: Skiba S., Drewnik M., Predki R., Szmuc R. (eds.): Soils of the Bieszczady National Park, Monografie Bieszczadzkie 2. (in Polish)
  • Stevens G.C. 1992. The elevational gradient in altitudinal range-an extension of Rapoport latitudinal rule to altitude. Am Nat 140:893- 911.
  • ter Braak C.J.F., Prentice I.C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271- 317.
  • ter Braak C.J.F., Smilauer P. 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (vers. 4). Microcomputer Power (Ithaca, NY USA).\
  • Thiele H.U. 1977. Carabid Beetles in Their Environments, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • Townsend C. R., Hildrew A. G. 1994. Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biology 31:265-275.
  • Unger H. 1960. Der Zellulosetest, eine Methode zur Ermittlung der zellulolytischen Aktivita¨t des Bodes in Fr eilan dver such en. Z. Pflanzenernahr. Dung. Bodenk. 91: 44- 52.
  • Walker B., Steffen W., 1999. The nature of global change. In: Walker B., Steffen W., Canadell J.G., Ingram J. eds, International Geosphere- Biosphere Programme Book Series, vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 1-18.
  • Wang X. P., Fang J., Sanders N.J., White P.S., Tang Z. 2009. Relative importance of climate vs local factors in shaping the regional patterns of forest plant richness across northeast China. Ecography 32: 133-142.
  • Whittaker, R.J., Willis K.J., Field R. 2001. Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. J. Biogeogr. 28: 453: 470.
  • Zapata F.A., Gaston K.J., Chown S.L. 2003. Middomain models of species richness gradients: assumptions, methods, and evidence. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 677- 690.