Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published January 5, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A comparative study of the aquatic insect diversity of two ponds located in Cachar District, Assam, India

Authors/Creators

Description

Dalal, Arpita, Gupta, Susmita, Online, Published, Version, Final (2016): A comparative study of the aquatic insect diversity of two ponds located in Cachar District, Assam, India. Turkish Journal of Zoology 40 (3): 392-401, DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1505-18, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1505-18

Files

source.pdf

Files (996.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:311622fe0e053a756faf9b63dace20f2
996.9 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:3116FFFE0E053A75FFAF9B63FFCEFFF2

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.13201079 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.13201083 (DOI)

References

  • Adams LW (1994).Urban Wildlife Habitats:A Landscape Perspective. Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
  • APHA (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed. Washington, DC, USA: APHA.
  • Bal A, Basu RC (1994a). Insecta: Hemiptera: Mesovelidae, Hydrometridae, Veliidae and Gerridae. In: State Fauna Series 3: Fauna of West Bengal. Part 5. Calcutta, India: Zoological Survey of India, pp. 511-534.
  • Bal A, Basu RC (1994b). Insecta: Hemiptera: Belostomatidae, Nepidae, Notonectidae and Pleidae. In: State Fauna Series 3: Fauna of West Bengal. Part 5. Calcutta, India: Zoological Survey of India, pp. 535-558.
  • (Usinger, 1968; McCafferty, 1981). Species belonging to the orders Coleoptera and Odonata are found in a single group associated with PO4 3-, Na, TA, TDS, EC, salinity, K, and FCO2. This shows that they are positively associated with nutrients in water and tolerant to anthropogenic impacts. In the CCA ordination diagram of JP, DO was negatively correlated with FCO2. In this graph also, Cloeon sp. showed a high positive association with DO, as found in UP. All the species belonging to the family Notonectidae, suborder Nepomorpha, which are truly aquatic, were found positively associated with AT, WT, TR, Na, and depth, indicating their preference for water. This is further confirmed by their abundance during the wet season (postmonsoon). Caenis sp. and Hydrometra greeni showed positive correlation with PO4 3-. Most of the species from Gerromorpha do not rely much on the water of the pond. Hence, where other water-dwelling insects find it unsuitable, they thrive well.
  • Barman B, Gupta P, Choudhury D, Dalal A, Gupta S (2014). Biomonitoring in lentic ecosystems of Irongmara, District Cachar, Assam, India, with special reference to aquatic insect community. International Research Journal of Environmental Sciences 3: 26-35.
  • Bhuiyan JR, Gupta S (2007). A comparative hydrobiological study of a few ponds of Barak Valley, Assam and their role as sustainable water resources. J Environ Biol 28: 799-802.
  • Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Weatherby A (2005). 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results and lessons learned from the work of pond conservation. Aquatic Consev Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15: 693-714.
  • BIS (2003). Indian Standard Drinking Water - Specification. First Revision. New Delhi, India: BIS.
  • Bouchard RW Jr (2004). Guide to Aquatic Invertebrates of the Upper Midwest. St. Paul, MN, USA: Water Resources Center, University of Minnesota.
  • Brittain JE (1974). Studies on the lentic Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera of Southern Norway. Nor Entomol Tidsskr 21: 135- 151.
  • Collinson NH, Biggs J, Corfield A, Hodson MJ, Walker D, Whitfield M, Williams PJ (1995). Temporary and permanent ponds: an assessment of the effects of drying out on the conservation value of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities. Biol Conserv 74: 125-134.
  • Dalal A, Gupta S (2014). Aquatic insect diversity in two temple ponds of Silchar, Assam, N.E. India and their conservation values. Knowl Manag Aquat Ec 415: 9.
  • Davies BR (2005). Developing a strategic approach to the protection of aquatic biodiversity. PhD, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
  • Engelmann HD (1978). Zur Dominanzklassifikazierung von Bodenarthropoden. Pedobiologia 18: 378-380 (in German).
  • Epler JH (2010). The Water Beetles of Florida - An Identification Manual for the Families Chrysomelidae, Curculionidae, Dryopidae, Dytiscidae, Elmidae, Gyrinidae, Haliplidae, Helophoridae, Hydraenidae, Hydrochidae, Hydrophilidae, Noteridae, Psephenidae, Ptilodactylidae and Scirtidae. Tallahassee, FL, USA: Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
  • Gilbert OL (1989). The Ecology of Urban Habitats. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall.
  • Gupta S, Devi SS (2014). Ecology of Baskandi anua, an Oxbow lake of South Assam, North East India. J Environ Biol 35: 1101-1105.
  • Hubbard MD, Peters WL (1978). Environmental Requirements and Pollution Tolerance of Ephemeroptera. EPA 600-4-78-061. Cincinnati, OH, USA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Kumar A (1973a). Descriptions of the last instar larvae of Odonata from the Dehra Dun Valley (India), with notes on biology I (Suborder: Zygoptera). Orient Insects 7: 23-61.
  • Kumar A (1973b). Descriptions of the last instar larvae of Odonata from the Dehra Dun Valley (India), with notes on biology II. (Suborder: Anisoptera). Orient Insects 7: 291-331.
  • Laskar HS, Gupta S (2013). Phytoplankton community and limnology of Chatla floodplain wetland of Barak valley, Assam, North-East India. Knowl Manag Aquat Ec 411: 6.
  • Lenat DR, Smock LA, Penrose DL (1980). Use of benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of environmental quality. In: Douglass LW, editor. Biological Monitoring for Environmental Effects. Toronto, Canada: Lexington Books, pp. 97-114.
  • Macan TT, Maudsley R (1968). The insects of the stony substratum of Windermere. Trans Soc Br Ent 18: 1-18.
  • Mandaville SM (2002). Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Freshwaters - Taxa Tolerance Values, Metrics, and Protocols. Project H-1. Halifax, Canada: Soil & Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax.
  • Mason CF (2002). Biology of Freshwater Pollution. 4th ed. London, UK: Prentice Hall.
  • McAbendroth L, Foggo A, Rundle SD, Bilton DT (2005). Unravelling nestedness and spatial pattern in pond assemblages. J Anim Ecol 74: 41-49.
  • McCafferty W (1981). Aquatic Entomology. Boston, MA, USA: Science Books International.
  • Michael P (1984). Ecological Methods for Field and Laboratory Investigation. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing.
  • Oertli B, Joye DA, Castella E, Juge R, Cambin D, Lachavanne JB (2002). Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol Conserv 104: 59-70.
  • Resh VH, Jackson JK (1993). Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg DM, Resh VH, editors. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. New York, NY, USA: Chapman and Hall, pp. 159-194.
  • Resh VH, Rosenberg DM (1984). The Ecology of Aquatic Insects. Portsmouth, NH, USA: Praeger Publishers.
  • Scheffer M, van Geest GJ, Zimmer K, Jeppsen E, Sondergaard M, Butler MG, Hanson MA, Declerck S, De Meester L (2006). Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richness: second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos 112: 227-231.
  • Shah RDT, Shah DN, Nesemann H (2011). Development of a macroinvertebrate-based Nepal Lake Biotic Index (NLBI): an applied method for assessing the ecological quality of lakes and reservoirs in Nepal. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology 1: 1-2.
  • Subramanian KA, Sivaramakrishnan KG (2007). Aquatic Insects for Biomonitoring Freshwater Ecosystems - A Methodology Manual. Bangalore, India: Asoka Trust for Research in Ecology and Environment.
  • Surve PR, Ambore NE, Pulle JS (2005). Hydrobiological studies of Kandhardam water, district Nanded (M.S.), India. J Ecophysiol Occup Hlth 5: 61-63.
  • Takhelmayum K, Gupta S (2015). Aquatic insect diversity of a protected area, Keibul Lamjao National Park in Manipur, North East India. J Asia Pac Entomol 18: 335-341.
  • ter Braak CJF (1995). Ordination. In: Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren OFR, editors. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91-173.
  • Tiwari DD, Mishra SM (2005). Limnological study during rainy season of Seetadwar lake at Shrawasti district. J Ecophysiol Occup Hlth 5: 71-72.
  • Turkmen G, Kazanci N (2010). Applications of various biodiversity indices to benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in streams of a national park in Turkey. Rev Hydrobiol 3: 111-125.
  • Usinger R (1968). Aquatic Insects of California. Los Angeles, CA, USA: University of California Press.
  • Westfall MJ, Tennessen, KJ(1996).Odonata.In: Merrit RW,Cummins KW, Berg MB, editors. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. 3rd ed. Dubuque, IA, USA: Kendall-Hunt Publishing, pp. 164-211.
  • Williams P, Whitfield M, Biggs J, Bray S, Fox G, Nicolet P, Sear D (2004). Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape. Biol Conserv 115: 329- 341.