Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published December 31, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Genetic divergences of South and Southeast Asian frogs: a case study of several taxa based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene data with notes on the generic name Fejervarya

Authors/Creators

Description

Hasan, Mahmudul, Islam, Mohammed Mafizul, Rahman, Md. Mukhlesur, Khan, Rahman, Igawa, Takeshi, Alam, Mohammad Shafiqul, Djong, Hon Tjong, Kurniawan, Nia, Joshy, Hareesh, Sen, Yong Hoi, Belabut, Daicus M., Kurabayashi, Atsushi, Kuramoto, Mitsuru, Sumida, Masayuki (2014): Genetic divergences of South and Southeast Asian frogs: a case study of several taxa based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene data with notes on the generic name Fejervarya. Turkish Journal of Zoology 38 (4): 389-411, DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1308-36, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1308-36

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0526bb568c83edeb664337690713e7a4
1.3 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:0526BB56FF83FFEB664337690713FFA4
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/0526BB56FF83FFEB664337690713FFA4

Related works

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F91FC32EFF8AFFE2661D33E603E5FC1B (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F91FC32EFF8AFFE264B834A6045FF8CD (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/F91FC32EFF8EFFE6661D37D706A1FC1A (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.13192475 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.13192477 (DOI)

References

  • Boulenger GA (1920). A monograph of the South Asian, Papuan, Melanesian and Australian frogs of the genus Rana. Rec Ind Mus 20: 1-226.
  • Brown RM, Guttman SI (2002). Phylogenetic systematic of the Rana signata complex of Philippine and Bornean stream frogs: reconsideration of Huxley's modification of Wallace's line at the Oriental-Australian faunal zone interface. Biol J Linn Soc 76: 393-461.
  • Brown RM, Linkem CW, Siler CD, Sukumaran J, Esselstyn JA, Diesmos AC, Iskandar DT, Bickford D, Evans BJ, McGuire JA et al. (2010). Phylogeography and historical demography of Polypedates leucomystax in the Islands of Indonesia and Philippines: Evidence for recent human-mediated range expansion? Mole Phylogenet Evol 57: 598-619.
  • Castresana J (2000). Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mole Biol Evol 17: 540-552.
  • Chan KO, Grismer LL (2010). Re-assessment of Reinwardt's gliding frog, Rhacophorus reinwardtii (Schlegel 1840) (Anura: Rhacophoridae) in Southern Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia and its re-description as a new species. Zootaxa 2505: 40-50.
  • Chanda SK (2002). Hand Book-Indian Amphibians. Kolkata, India: Zoological Survey of India.
  • Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MR (1997). Species: The units of biodiversity. 1st ed. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
  • Cracraft J (1989). Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation. In: Otte D, Endler J, editors. Speciation and Its Consequences. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 28-59.
  • Daniels RJR (2005). India-A Lifescape, Amphibians of Peninsular India. Hyderabad, India: Indian Academy of Sciences, Universities Press (India) Private Limited.
  • Das I (2002). An Introduction to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Tropical Asia. Kota Kinabalu, Borneo: Natural History Publications (Borneo).
  • Das I, Ravichandran MS (1998 [1997]). A new species of Polypedates (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from the Western Ghats, India, allied to the Sri Lankan P.cruciger Blyth, 1852. Hamadryad 22: 88-94.
  • Dayrat B (2005). Towards integrative taxonomy. Biol J Linn Soc 85: 407-415.
  • de Queiroz K (1998). The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: A conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, editors. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, pp. 57-75.
  • de Queiroz K, Donoghue MJ (1990). Phylogenetic systematics or
  • Djong TH, Islam MM, Nishioka M, Matsui M, Ota H, Kuramoto M, Khan MMR, Alam MS, Anslem DS, Khonsue W et al. (2007). Genetic relationships and reproductive-isolation mechanisms among the Fejervarya limnocharis complex from Indonesia (Java) and other Asian countries. Zool Sci 24: 360-375.
  • Dobzhansky T (1950). Mendelian populations and their evolution. Am Nat 84: 401-418.
  • Dobzhansky T (1976). Organismic and molecular aspects of species formation. In: Ayala FJ, editor. Molecular evolution. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 95-105.
  • Dubois A (1987). Miscellanea taxonomica batrachologica (II). Alytes 6: 1-9.
  • Dubois A, Ohler A (1999). Asian and Oriental toads of the Bufo melanostictus, Bufo scaber and Bufo stejnegeri groups (Amphibia, Anura): a list of available and valid names and redescription of some name-bearing types. J S Asian Nat Hist 4: 133-180.
  • Dubois A, Ohler A, Biju SD (2001). A new genus and species of Ranidae (Amphibia, Anura) from south-western India. Alytes 19: 53-79.
  • Dumeril AMC, Bibron G (1841). Erpetologie Generale ou Histoire Naturelle Complete des Reptiles Tome 8. Roret, Paris (in French).
  • Dutta SK (1997). Amphibians of India and Sri Lanka (Checklist and Bibliography). Bhubaneswar, India: Odyssey Publication House.
  • Dutta SK, Manamendra-Arachchi K (1996). The Amphibian Fauna of Sri Lanka. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Wildlife Heritage Trust of Sri Lanka.
  • Emerson SB, Richards C, Drewes RC, Kjer KM (2000). On the relationships among ranoid frogs: a review of the evidence. Herpetologica 56: 209-230.
  • Ereshefsky M (1992). The units of evolution: Essays on the nature of species. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press.
  • Ferguson JWH (2002). On the use of genetic divergence for identifying species. Biol J Linn Soc 74: 509-516.
  • Fouquet A, Gilles A, Vences M, Marty C, Blanc M, Gemmell NJ (2007). Underestimation of species richness in neotropical frogs revealed by mtDNA analysis. PLoS ONE 2: e1109.
  • Frost DR (2013). Amphibian Species of the world: An online reference 5.6. Electronic Database accessible at http://research. amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
  • Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain R, Haas A, Haddad CFB, de Sa RO, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Wilkinson M et al. (2006). The amphibian tree of life. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 297: 1-370.
  • Funk WC, Caminer M, Ron SR (2012). High levels of cryptic species diversity uncovered in Amazonian frogs. Proc R Soc B 279: 1806-1814.
  • Futuyma DJ (2005). Evolution. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates. Gouy MAM, Guindon S, Gascuel O (2010). SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 27: 221-224.
  • Gaston AJ, Zacharias VJ (1996). The recent distribution of endemic and disjunct birds in Kerala state: preliminary results of an ongoing survey. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 93: 389-400.
  • Glaw F, Kohler J, de La Riva I, Vieites DR, Vences M (2010). Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy tree frogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis. Zootaxa 2383: 1-82.
  • Hanken J (1999). Why are there so many new amphibian species when amphibians are declining? Trends Ecol Evol 14: 7-8.
  • Hasan M, Islam MM, Khan MMR, Alam MS, Kurabayashi A, Igawa T, Kuaramoto M, Sumida M (2012a). Cryptic anuran biodiversity in Bangladesh revealed by mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequences. Zool Sci 29: 162-172.
  • Hasan M, Kuaramoto M, Islam MM, Alam MS, Khan MMR, Sumida M (2012b). A new species of genus Hoplobatrachus (Anura, Dicroglossidae) from the coastal belt of Bangladesh. Zootaxa 3312: 45-58.
  • Herbert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, de Waard JR (2003). Biological identification through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270: 313-321.
  • Herbert PDN, Stoekle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004). Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2: e312.
  • Howlader MS (2011). Cricket Frog (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae): Two regions of Asia are corresponding two groups. BNNOPRANI: Bd Wl Bull 5: 1-7.
  • Inger RF (1947). Preliminary survey of the amphibians of the Riukiu islands. Fieldiana Zool 32: 297-352.
  • Inger RF (1999). Distribution of amphibians in Southern Asia and adjacent islands. In: Duellman WE, editor. Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: A Global Perspective. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 445-482.
  • Inger RF, Stuart BL, Iskandar DT (2009). Systematics of a widespread Southeast Asian frog, Rana Chalconota (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae). Zool J Linn Soc 155: 123-147.
  • Inger RF, Stuebing RB (2005). A Field Guide to the Frogs of Borneo. Borneo: Natural History Publication.
  • Iskandar DT (1998). The Amphibians of Java and Bali. Bogor, Indonesia: Research and Development Centre for Biology- LIPI.
  • Islam MM, Khan MMR, Djong HT, Alam MS, Sumida M (2008a). Genetic differentiation of the Fejervarya limnocharis complex from Bangladesh and other Asian countries elucidated by allozyme analyses. Zool Sci 25: 261-272.
  • Islam MM, Kurose N, Khan MMR, Nishizawa T, Kuramoto M, Alam MS, Hasan M, Kurniwan N, Nishioka M, Sumida M (2008b). Genetic divergence and reproductive isolation in the genus Fejervarya (Amphibia: Anura) from Bangladesh inferred from morphological observations, crossing experiments, and molecular analyses. Zool Sci 25: 1084-1105.
  • Jansen M, Bloch R, Schulze A, Pfenninger M (2011). Integrative inventory of Bolivia's lowland reveals hidden diversity. Zool Scr 40: 567-583.
  • Jayaram KC (1974). Ecology and distribution of freshwater fishes, amphibians and reptiles. In: Mani MS, Editor. In Ecology and Biogeography in India. The Hague, Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk B.V. Publishers, pp. 517-580.
  • Jobb G, von Haeseler A, Strimmer K (2004). TREEFINDER: a powerful graphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics. BMC Evol Biol 4: 18.
  • Karanth KP (2003). Evolution of disjunct distributions among wet-zone species of the Indian subcontinent: Testing various hypotheses using a phylogenetic approach. Curr Sci India 85: 1276-1283.
  • Kosuch J, Vences M, Dubois A, Ohler A, Bohme W (2001). Out of Asia: mitochondrial DNA evidence for an Oriental origin of tiger frogs, genus Hoplobatrachus. Mole Phylogenet Evol 21: 398-407.
  • Kotaki M, Kurabayashi A, Matsui M, Kuramoto M, Djong HT, Sumida M (2010). Molecular phylogeny of the diversified frogs of genus Fejervarya (Anura: Dicroglossidae). Zool Sci 27: 386-395.
  • Kurabayashi A, Kuramoto M, Joshy H, Sumida M (2005) Molecular phylogeny of the Ranid frogs from Southwest India based on the mitochondrial ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Zool Sci 22: 525-534.
  • Kuraishi N, Matsui M, Ota H (2009). Estimation of the origin of Polypedates leucomystax (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae) introduced to the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Pac Sci 63: 317- 325.
  • Kuramoto M, Joshy SH, Kurabayashi A, Sumida M (2007). The genus Fejervarya (Anura: Ranidae) in Central Western Ghats, India, with description of four new cryptic species. Curr Herpetol 26: 81-105.
  • Kurniawan N, Islam MM, Djong HT, Igawa T, Daicus MB, Yong HS, Wanichanon R, Khan MMR, Iskandar DT, Nishioka M et al. (2010). Genetic divergence and evolutionary relationship in Fejervarya cancrivora from Indonesia and other Asian countries inferred from allozyme and mtDNA sequence analyses. Zool Sci 27: 222-233.
  • Kurup GU (1974). Mammals of Assam and the mammal-geography of India. In: Mani MS, Editor. In Ecology and Biogeography in India. The Hague, Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk B.V. Publishers, pp. 585-613.
  • Lannoo M (2005). Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, USA: University of California Press.
  • Matsui M, Hamidy A, Belabut DM, Ahmad N, Panha S, Sudin A, Khonsue W, Oh HS, Yong HS, Jiang JP et al. (2011). Systematic relationships of Oriental tiny frogs of the family Microhylidae (Amphibia, Anura) as revealed by mtDNA geneology. Mole Phylogenet Evol 61: 167-176.
  • Matsui M, Hamidy A, Murphy RW, Khonsue W, Yambun P, Shimada T, Ahmad N, Belabut DM, Jiang JP (2010). Phylogenetic relationships of megophryid frogs of the genus Leptobrachium (Amphibia, Anura) as revealed by mtDNA gene sequences. Mole Phylogenet Evol 56: 259-272.
  • Matsui M, Ito H, Shimada T, Ota H, Saidapur SK, Khonsue W, Tomoko TU, Wu GF (2005). Taxonomic relationships within the Pan-Oriental narrow-mouth toad Microhyla ornata as revealed by mtDNA analysis (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae). Zool Sci 22: 489-495.
  • Mayden RL (1997). A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In: Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MR, editors. Species: The Units of Biodiversity. London, UK: Chapman and Hall, pp. 381-424.
  • Mayden RL (1999). Consilience and a hierarchy of species concepts: advances toward closure on the species puzzle. J Nematol 31: 95-116.
  • Mayr E (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
  • Mayr E (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA, USA, and London, UK: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Meenakshi K, Sujith VG, Sanil G (2009). DNA barcoding of some amphibians of Western Ghats. Third International Barcode of Life Conference (in press).
  • Mila B, Tavares ES, Saldana AM, Karubian J, Smith TB, Baker AJ (2012). A trans-Amazonian Screening of mtDNA reveals deep intraspecific divergence in forest birds and suggests a vast underestimation of species diversity. PLoS ONE 7: e40541.
  • Moyle RG, Schilthuizen M, Rahman MA, Sheldon FH (2005). Molecular phyogenetic analysis of the white-crowned forktail Enicurus leschenaulti in Borneo. J Avian Biol 36: 96-101.
  • Ohler A, Deuti K, Grosjean S, Paul S, Ayyaswamy AK, Ahmed MF, Dutta SK (2009). Small-sized dicroglossids from India, with the description of a new species from West Bengal, India. Zootaxa 2209: 43-56.
  • Padil JM, Miralles A, de la Riva I, Vences M (2010). The integrative future of taxonomy. Front Zool 7: 16.
  • Pyron RA, Wiens JJ (2011). A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mole Phylogenet Evol 61: 543-583.
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2007). Tracer v. 1.5. http://beast.bio. ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
  • Roe BA, Ma DP, Wilson RK, Wong JFH (1985). The complete nucleotide sequences of Xenopus laevis mitochondrial genome. J Biol Chem 260: 9759-9774.
  • Ronquist F,Huelsenbeck JP (2003).MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
  • Stuart BL, Inger RF, Voris HK (2006). High level of cryptic species diversity revealed by sympatric lineages of Southeast Asian forest frogs. Biol Lett 2: 470-474.
  • Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004). Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306: 1783-1786.
  • Sumida M, Kondo Y, Kanamori Y, Nishioka M (2002). Inter- and intraspecific evolutionary relationships of the rice frog Rana limnocharis and the allied species R. cancrivora inferred from crossing experiments and mitochondrial DNA sequences of the 12S and 16S rRNA genes.Mol Phylogenet Evol 25: 293-305.
  • Sumida M,Kotaki M, Islam MM,Djong HT, Igawa T, Kondo Y,Matsui M, Anslem, Khonsue DSW, Nishioka M (2007). Evolutionary relationships and reproductive isolating mechanisms in the rice frog (Fejervarya limnocharis) species complex from Sri Lanka, Thailand, Taiwan and Japan, inferred from mtDNA gene sequences, allozymes, and crossing experiments. Zool Sci 24: 547-562.
  • Tanabe AS (2007). Kakusan: a computer program to automate the selection of a nucleotide substitution model and the configuration of a mixed model on multilocus data. Mole Ecol Notes 7: 962-964.
  • Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A, Thomas RH, Vogler AP (2003). A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 70-74.
  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994). ClustalW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680.
  • Turner H, Hovenkamp P, Welzen PCV (2001). Biogeography of Southeast Asia and the West Pacific. J Biogeogr 28: 217-230.
  • Vences M, Thomas M, Bonett RM, Vieites DR (2005a). Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges. Phil Trans R Soc B 360: 1859-1868.
  • Vences M, Thomas M, Meijden AVD, Chiari Y, Vieites DR (2005b). Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Front Zool 2: 5.
  • Vieites DR, Wollenberg KC, Andreone F, Kohler J, Glaw F, Vences M (2009). Vast underestimation of Madagascar's biodiversity evidenced by an integrative amphibian inventory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (PNAS), 106: 8267-8272.
  • Vogt T (1911). Beitrag zur Amphibien-fauna der Insel Formosa. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin 1911: 179-184 (in German).
  • Wright S (1940). The statistical consequences of Mendelian Heredity in relation to speciation. In: Huxley J, editor. The New Systematics. London, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 161- 183.