Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published January 13, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Diversity in the Globally Distributed Diatom Genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae): Three New Species from Warm-Temperate Waters

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, College of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, P. R. China,
  • 2. Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, & Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok, Thailand,
  • 3. Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy,
  • 4. Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy, & Department of Oceanography and Center COPAS Sur-Austral, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile,
  • 5. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cd. Universitaria, Coyoacán, Cd. de México, México,
  • 6. Section of Marine Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 7. Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark,

Description

Li, Yang, Boonprakob, Atchaneey, Gaonkar, Chetan C., Kooistra, Wiebe H. C. F., Lange, Carina B., Hernández-Becerril, David, Chen, Zuoyi, Moestrup, Øjvind, Lundholm, Nina (2017): Diversity in the Globally Distributed Diatom Genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae): Three New Species from Warm-Temperate Waters. PLoS ONE (e0168887) 12 (1): 1-38, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168887

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. <a href="https://zenodo.org/account/settings/login?next=https://zenodo.org/records/12827437">Log in</a> to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Cites
Publication: 10.1016/j.protis.2007 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01132.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.024 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.12630658 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E87C87F48360FFC2FDE67F93AFD3FC9B (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.12630660 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E87C87F48379FFC4FDE67F25A9EAFEB1 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.12630674 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E87C87F48344FFFBFDE67F99A9CFF973 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.12630682 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E87C87F48344FFFAFDE67ACDAF56FCD1 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.12630684 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E87C87F48345FFFAFDE67F43A921FB53 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.12630686 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E87C87F48345FFF9FDE678C5A811FE3E (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827439 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827441 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827445 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/34AA666A836DFFD2FF937CC6A9C2FF20 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827447 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827450 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827452 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/34AA666A8369FFD6FDE67CC6A960FF20 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827454 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827456 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827458 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827460 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827462 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827464 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827468 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827470 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827472 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827474 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827476 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827478 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827480 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.12827482 (DOI)
Is source of
Dataset: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/093dd7b1-7215-4698-a02d-a6fd7b1b965d (URL)

References

  • 1. Mann DG, Droop SJM. Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms. Hydrobiol. 1996; 336: 19-32
  • 2. Mann DG, Vanormelingen P. An inordinate fondness? The number, distributions and origins of diatom species.J Eukar Microbiol. 2013; 60: 414-420
  • 3. Kooistra WHCF, Sarno D, Balzano S, Gu H, Andersen RA, Zingone A. Global diversity and biogeography of Skeletonema species (Bacillariophyta). Protist. 2008; 159: 177-193 doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2007. 09.004 PMID: 18042429
  • 4. Lundholm N, Bates SS, Baugh KA, Bill BD, Connell LB, Leger C et al. Cryptic and pseudo-cryptic diversity in diatoms-with descriptions of Pseudo-nitzschia hasleana sp. nov. and P. fryxelliana sp. nov. J Phycol. 2012; 48: 436-454 doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01132.x PMID:27009733
  • 5. Guiry MD & Guiry GM. Algaebase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org (last update 1-April 2016)
  • 6. Hasle GR, Syvertsen EE. Marine Diatoms. In Tomas CR (ed) Identifying Marine Phytoplankton. Academic Press, London;1997. pp 5-387
  • 7. Cleve PT. On diatoms from the Arctic Sea. Bihang till K Svenska Vet-Akad Handlingar. 1873; 1: 1-28
  • 8. Grunow A. Uber einige neue und ungenugend bekannte Arten und Gattungen von Diatomaceen. Verhandl kaiserl-konigl zool-bot Ges. 1863; 13: 137-162
  • 9. Jensen KG, Moestrup O. The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in inner Danish coastal waters. Opera Bot. 1998; 133: 5-68
  • 10. Rines JEB, Hargraves PE. The Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyceae) flora of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. Bibl Phycol. 1988; 79: 5-196
  • 11. Berard-Therriault L, Poulin M, Bosse M. Guide d'identification du phytoplancton marin de l'estuaire et du golfe du Saint-Laurent incluant egalement certains protozoaires. Publ. spec. can. sci. halieut. aquat. 1999; 128: 1-387.
  • 12. Hernandez-Becerril DU. A morphological study of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyta) from the plankton of the Pacific Ocean of Mexico. Bull Nat Hist Mus Lond (Bot). 1996; 26: 1-73
  • 13. Shevchenko OG, Orlova TYu, Hernandez-Becerril DU. The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Bot Mar. 2006; 49: 236-258
  • 14. Guo YJ, Qian SB. Flora Algarum Marinarum Sinicarum. Tomus V. Bacillariophyta, No.1 Centricae. Beijing: Science Press; 2003. pp 345-346
  • 15. Hernandez-Becerril DU, Flores Granados C. Species of the diatom genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in the plankton from the Southern Gulf of Mexico. Bot Mar. 1998; 41: 505-519
  • 16. Wang Y, Nie R, Li Y, Lu SH. Species diversity and geographical distribution of Chaetoceros in Guangdong coastal waters.Adv Mar Sci. 2010; 28: 342-352
  • 17. Bailey JW. Notice of microscopic forms found in the soundings of the Sea of Kamtschatka. Am J Sci Arts Sec Ser. 1856; 22: 1-6
  • 18. Cleve PT. Diatoms from Baffins Bay and Davis Strait. K Svenska Vet-Akad Handl. 1896; 22: 3-22
  • 19. Throndsen J, Hasle GR, Tangen K. Norsk Kystplankton Flora. Almater Forlag AS, Oslo. 2003.
  • 20. Cupp E. Marine plankton diatoms of the west coast of North America.Bull Scripps Inst Oceanogr. 1943; 5: 1-237
  • 21. Evensen DL, Hasle GR. The morphology of some Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) species as seen in the electron microscopes. Nova Hedw, Beih. 1975; 53: 152-174
  • 22. Guillard RRL, Hargraves PE. Stichochrysis immobilis is a diatom, not a chrysophyte. Phycologia 1993; 32: 234-236
  • 23. Kraus D (2014) Daniel's XL Toolbox addin for Excel, version 6.10. 2014. http://xltoolbox.sourceforge. net.
  • 24. Suto I. Taxonomy of the marine resting spore genera Dicladia Ehrenberg,Monocladia gen. nov. and Synendrum Ehrenberg and their stratigraphic significance in Miocene strata. Diatom Res. 2003; 18: 331-356.
  • 25. Lundholm N, Daugbjerg N, Moestrup O. Phylogeny of the Bacillariaceae with emphasis on the genus Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) based on partial LSU rDNA. Eur J Phycol.2002; 37: 115-134
  • 26. Scholin CA, Herzog M, Sogin M, Anderson DM. Identification of group- and strain-specific genetic markers for globally distributed Alexandrium (Dinophyceae). II. Sequence analysis of a fragment of the LSU rDNA. J Phycol.1994; 30: 999-1011
  • 27. Nunn GB, Theisen BF, Christensen B, Arctander P. Simplicity-correlated size growth of the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA D3 expansion segment in the crustacean order Isopoda. J Mol Evol. 1996; 42: 211-223 PMID: 8919873
  • 28. Zhen Y, Mi TZ, Yu ZG. Detection of Phaeocystis globosa using sandwich hybridization integrated with nuclease protection assay (NPA-SH). J Environ Sci, 2008; 20: 1481-1486
  • 29. Alverson AJ, Jansen RK, Theriot EC. Bridging the Rubicon: Phylogenetic analysis reveals repeated colonizations of marine and fresh waters by thalassiosiroid diatoms. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007; 45: 193- 210 doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.024 PMID: 17553708
  • 30. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for window 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp.1999; 41: 95-98
  • 31. Swofford DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), Vers. 4. Sinauer Ass., Sunderland, Mass., USA.2003
  • 32. Posada D, Crandall KA. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998; 14: 817-818 PMID: 9918953
  • 33. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.Bioinformatics. 2003; 19: 1572-1574 PMID: 12912839
  • 34. Brunel J. Orientation of setae in the genus Chaetoceros, in regard to the apical axis. J Mar Biol Ass India. 1972; 14: 315-327
  • 35. Kooistra WHCF, Sarno D, Hernandez-Becerril DU, Assmy P, Prisco CD, Montresor M. Comparative molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses of taxa in the Chaetocerataceae (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia. 2010; 49: 471-500
  • 36. Okuno H. Electron microscopical study on fine structure of diatom frustules.XIV. Observation on the genus Chaetoceros. Bot Mag, Tokyo.1956; 69: 182-200
  • 37. Lee SD, Joo HM & Lee JH. Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) based on setae ultrastructure.II. Subgenus Hyalochaete. Phycologia. 2014; 53: 614-638
  • 38. Lee SD, Park JS, Yun SM & Lee JH. Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) based on setae ultrastructure.I. Subgenus Chaetoceros. Phycologia. 2014; 53: 174-187
  • 39. Okamura K. Some littoral diatoms of Japan.Rep Imper Fish Inst Tokyo Japan. 1911; 7: 3-18
  • 40. Suto I. Taxonomy and biostratigraphy of the fossil marine diatom resting spore genera Dicladia Ehrenberg, Monocladia Suto and Syndendrium Ehrenberg in the North Pacific and Norwegian Sea.Diatom Res. 2005; 20: 351-374.
  • 41. Chin TG. A list of Chinese diatoms from 1847 to 1946. Amoy Fish Bull. 1951; 1: 145-230
  • 42. Chin TG, Chen JH, Huang KG, eds. Marine Planktonic Diatoms from China Sea. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai,116 p. 1965.